To talk about issues....same as the liberals who go to the conservative board...

• Question about Hilary - Taiga
  • May I suggest - reveille
    • good idea - Taiga
      • Exactly....and that happens on both sides... - Observer
  • Hi there Taiga! sm - whorn
    • Thanks for you thoughts - Taiga
  • Hillary is wonderful - Liberal democrat
    • Well, we do have something in common... - Observer
      • so just why is it that you are on this forum? - *scratching head in puzzlement*....n/m
        • To talk about issues....same as the liberals who go to the conservative board... - Observer
      • TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU - anon
  • Didn't know she had any positive qualities - JMO
    • AGREE nm - anon
    • Well, she seems bright.... - Taiga
      • I agree that Hillary is smart... - Observer
      • Dont pay attention to those posts - Liberal democrat
        • I only post under one handle.... - Observer
  • She's a Clinton, so in my book, she's O-U-T. I'll be voting - for someone else. nm
    • same here - anon
      • different here. nm - 2anon

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

9/11/2001:  We all talk about 9/11.  How Pres. Bush should have known.  We did lose a lot of lives that day.  It was truly a sad day.  However, what about the World Trade Center bombing back in ྙ when Clinton was the pres.  That was by Islamic extremists.  Or about the US Embassy bombings in ྞ....also while Bill was in office suspect to have been coordinated by Osama Bin Laden.  Or the USS Cole incident in 2000 and once again Bill was in the White House and once again Osama was the suspect in the planning.  All these terrorists acts but the one people shout out about the most in 9/11 and how Bush is to blame.  Why?  Because more lives were lost in this one than with the other ones.  Weren't they all still terrorist attacks?  If Clinton had stood up and done something during his term....maybe 9/11 would not have happened at all but yet the blame all falls upon Bush.

Katrina:  Once again all Bush's faults and therefore all republicans faults.  Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff was the "federal official with the power to mobilize a massive federal response to Hurricane Katrina, [and] could have ordered federal agencies into action without any request from state or local officials."  "If you go back to August 27th," President Bush had already "declared a state of emergency in the state of Louisiana under Title V of the Stafford Act, ... Ergo, Katrina became an Incident of National Significance on August 27th -- two days before the storm. But Chertoff apparently didn't realize this and waited till a day after [on August 30th] to make the determination on his own, one that according to the flow chart had already been made."  Honestly though, if you live in a place that is well below sea level and you hear a really bit storm is coming your way.....common sense.....you get the heck out of dodge.

Iraq war:  The reason for the war was this:  The military objectives of the invasion were; end the Hussein regime; eliminate weapons of mass destruction; eliminate Islamic terrorists; obtain intelligence on terrorist networks; distribute humanitarian aid; secure Iraq’s oil infrastructure; and assist in creating a representative government as a model for other Middle East nations

As for Wall Street:  Firms such as Goldman Sachs and Lehman not only made billions of dollars packaging and selling these toxic loans, they also wagered with their own capital that the values of these investments would decline, further raising their profits. If any other industries engaged in such knowingly unscrupulous activities, there would be an immediate federal investigation.

At the same time, federal regulatory agencies such as the SEC stood idly by as Wall Street took advantage of the investment public during both the Internet and the housing bubbles. The SEC took almost no action against Wall Street after the dot-com implosion. And in the midst of the housing bubble, in 2006, only the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency pushed for any level of regulation to address subprime lending.

One has to wonder why Treasury secretaries under Presidents Clinton and Bush -- Robert Rubin and Hank Paulson, respectively -- took no action to curb these abuses. It certainly was not because they did not understand Wall Street's practices -- both are former chief executives of Goldman Sachs. And why has Congress been so silent? The Wall Street investment banking firms, their executives, their families and their political action committees contribute more to U.S. Senate and House campaigns than any other industry in America. By sprinkling some of its massive gains into the pockets of our elected officials, Wall Street bought itself protection from any tough government enforcement.

This is no doubt the same reason why so many members of Congress were consistently blocking attempts to reform and downsize Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which are essentially giant, undercapitalized hedge funds. These two entities have been huge money machines for Democrats in both the House and the Senate, many of whom recently had the gall to ask why these companies hadn't been reformed in the past. Nor should several Republican congressmen and Senators who likewise contributed to watering down legislation aimed at reforming these institutions be let off the hook.

their opinions.

I, for one, thought it was funny. Before the election, I also stated that if O was elected, I would be quitting my job 'cause I was tired of working and wanted some of the free money. That was also a joke. I don't know what I'd do if I didn't work. Workaholic, ya know.

station focused on how "hot" Sarah Palin was, not her brains.  How they'd like to see her naked, in a bikini, etc, etc.  As for being governor, the state of Alaska ranks 47th in population, not exactly New York or Massachusetts or you name it.  As for bashing her because she is "pretty", I'll take brains over beauty any day.  Pretty shallow to back someone because they're "pretty" or "hot."  The day Sarah Palin sets foot in the white house, is the day I move to Canada or maybe I'll move to Alaska!

And lastly, as for me typing my little black keys, look who is calling the kettle black.  When was the last time you ran for governor? 

I try not to visit the bog of eternal stench. Funny though...sm

You apparently have issues that are not going to be solved by endless bashing on a liberal board.

Although I may not like the rules on this board I am mature and courteous enough to at least try to follow them. 

where we are free to talk about the extreme hatefulness coming from this board.  However, when some people wish the president dead...well that's bordering on a THREAT to the president.  I actually be afraid to post things like that.  You might receive a friendly knock on the door from the FBI.

Again, There were trolls on the liberal board (no consistent moniker that's the first thing that gives trolls away) posting VERY NASTY replies anytime a conservative posted anything on THEIR OWN BOARD.  It takes a lot nerve to argue with the administrator of this board who can delete you and ban you for any reason. It is a private board BTW no public doman.   Many of you have been stalking on the conservative board for weeks.  You have been posting near threats on the president....what do you expect the administrator to do!?  Start talking about real subjects and quit having a hate fest over here and you might find the administrator a little more sympathetic to your plight....

with this and other posts:

*The liberals are a bunch of chickens running about with their heads cut off, THE SKY IS FALLING!* 

I realize your board is DEAD, but please go away. 

Which God was that?  THe one that plays favorites?

the entire thread beginning with:

I try not to visit the bog of eternal stench. Funny though...sm

[Post a Reply] [View Follow Ups] [Politics] --> [Conservatives]

Posted By: Nan on 2005-06-30,
In Reply to: Obviously they are not happy - American Girl

And Ending with:

Frankly, AG, they kind of give me the creeps. sm

[Post a Reply] [View Follow Ups] [Politics] --> [Conservatives]

Posted By: Nan on 2005-06-30,
In Reply to: Man, Am I good or what? - American Girl

All I saw were you guys *applause applause*-ing each other and the usual ragging on all liberals.  Then I saw ONE courageous soul who attempted to debate with you, followed by the usual and customary *stay off the board* warnings to the poster.

So it seems you guys consider nice debate as ganging up and attacking posters who disagree with you.

Maybe that's the problem here.  We view nice debate in two different ways.

We view it as being nice to other posters and not personally attacking those who disagree with us.  We don't claim to know what they are thinking and feeling in their minds and hearts, and we find those who insist on being nasty to others very distasteful and crude.  We don't LIKE to act the way that you neocons act.  We'd rather be friendly and civilized. That's why you're not welcome here.  It's not because of what you believe.  It's because you are unable to act like decent human beings, and you don't know how to treat other people.