This was an add with no substance or "facts.."
Posted By: sam on 2008-08-27
In Reply to: What?! - ObamaAyers
just a bunch of innuendo and although I am not voting for Obama and am concerned about the "connection," I applaud Fox for not running the ad. I have not seen it, but if Fox chose not to run it they must think there is not much truth to that particular ad. You can still research on the internet, and a bunch of papers were just released from Columbia University that might shed some light on the relationship, and Fox will cover that.
All that being said...people attack Fox all the time for being one-sided (which they are not, there are more two-sided than ANY other outlet), but choosing not to air this ad should send a message to people that while they are the most conservative network, they do hear the other side and they are fair.
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
Where do you get your "facts"?
where are the "facts" from?
link of what you just read... i mean everything that one side says can be challenged with "facts"... come on, i dont know why people are so against acknowleding that both parties have problems!!!
Is this where you get your "facts?"s/m
Pure McCain propaganda. It has been said that one can take the Bible and prove or disprove any statement if it is taken out of context and just taking a snippet here and there. I have watched just about everything both candidates had to say about anything and I will watch the debates tonight. I might suggest that you consider getting your facts from such a reliable source as the candidate's own mouth.
I remind you that most of the issues, if not all, in this propaganda will not be enacted by the president. My suggestion is that if you are so scared of Obama, then if the congress people in your district are up for election, vote for the Republican candidate if that is who you think will best represent your values. Might I remind you that the $700 billion bail-out was provided to us by the Republicans? Yes, it was. They could have held the line and kept it from passing but they were too greedy for their pork. We think either of these candidates is going to deliver us? Well, I hate to tell you it ain't so.
Your "facts" are old, as I said before, from...sm
the primary. He said back then that he didn't think Obama was ready, but could be. He also said the Hilly Cinton was not qualified to be president. He was running for president. What did you expect him to say. Did McCain praise his opponents in the primary campaign? Get real. Obviously Joe Biden does think Obama is ready now. You just cannot accept it, nor would you accept anything any democrat has to say.
Where in the world do you get your "facts." SM
Please name the socialist states that are enjoying economic success. Name just one.
There is a problem with some of the "facts"
quoted in this letter. So I would advise anyone who reads it to research those "facts." Especially the "in the center of the Keating 5 scandal." That is an out and out lie.
Nobody should take anything for granted that is posted, especially opinion with no verifiable facts. Research and find out for yourself and make your own informed decision. This election is too important not to.
Artlcles and "facts" have been posted here........ sm
from Factcheck as being "gospel" in the past and conservatives were acutely admonished for trying to discredit the source. That's the point.
what substance
I don't see any substance in McCain at all.
Do you have anything of substance to say?
fu
nothing of substance to say so..
you attack the poster. Is that how we are supposed to use this board?
Substance of course being in lockstep
with you. Do you not see that as many talking points, right-wing quotes and such are seen on the conservative side as you purport are on the left. You guys talk a lot of right-wing recycled trash as you say we do left. Siiiiiiiigh.
Anything of substance she's reading from the
She is very nervous obviously.
Got a whole lot more going in the substance department
his campaign jumping from one smear to the next, lurching around trying to find his trajectory, running from the issue of the economy ("is not my strong suit and if we talk about it, we'll lose), has yet to come up with a coherent campaign theme except the change slogan he highjacked fromm Obama and cannot articulate one single sentence on the subject of how he would handle his 90% self any differently than the shrub.
Speaking of substance, Sally, that is what your
nm
your post has no political substance either
nm
If you want to vote personality over policy and substance
nm
Palin is substance, if that's what you're referring to!
x
O is "just words, just speeches", little substance.
nm
Thats good cos dems give no substance to
the conversations here. Just attacks at those who don't agree with them. Take a look at all the postings. Its the dems going after the republicans.
Then maybe you should stick to facts, substance and issues
The liberals attack those who do not agree with them. And it's not attacks on issues or facts it's personal name calling attacks.
No big loss. That poster added nothing of substance and sounded like he/she is a
troll from the conservative board. 
|
