Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

The problem with what you had ...(sm)

Posted By: Just the big bad on 2009-05-30
In Reply to: All I want is for people to leave - Trigger Happy

suggested previously is that it excluded gays who are christians.  With what I'm talking about it completely separates ANY faith-based ideals from unions.  A union would simply be a legal state.  However, with this system, people would be able to carry out whatever religious-based ceremonies they wanted to without stepping on anyone else's toes.  For example.  If you and your husband are christains, you go and get married in a church and uphold whatever beliefs you have.  For it to be legally recognized, you would have to have a union.


By the same token, if Mary and Sue want to get married, they can go to their church and recognize whatever their beliefs are.  They also would have to have a union in order for it to be legally recognized.


This would separate out different belief systems from the central concept of "marriage."  It allows everyone to practice their beliefs without bothering anyone else, but also allows everyone to enjoy the legal benefits --- and that part would come with the unions.




Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database