Sure it is...that's why she says CON not cons and it's all in caps. sm
Posted By: sm on 2006-03-14
In Reply to: Libs cons. It's just an abbreviation. sm - Democrat
Ha ha ha. Whatever.
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
Sorry, this goes below the all in caps post.
.
your CAPS LOCK
is all wonky, girlfriend. Call the repairman.
are you aware all caps is yelling?
please do not yell at me
The caps was so that you who complain about abortion posts...
could just pass it up. But I guess that would be just too much to expect. What it was meant to illustrate is medical fact, nothing to do with religion, at the point of many abortions it is a well formed child, moving, heart beating, all those pesky things that classify we human beings as alive. I do realize that that makes it somewhat more difficult to defend...but I am sure you will find a way.
Nor do I understand the pile on mentality of some of you who post on this board. Instead of posting the issues that are important to you, you seem content to bash me for posting the ones that are important to me.
Abortion is a political issue. Politicians make laws, last time I looked.
Pro lifers are not all "religious." Do some research and you will see that. It is a moral issue. Do you think you have to be religious to be a moral person??
Pray tell, why don't YOU move on? Stop replying to any posts that you don't want to continue. This is all within all of you pile-on flamers' ability to control. Just don't reply. What is so hard about that? I do not post to argue...I post for information. It is YOU who wants to argue. If you don't answer the posts, who is going to argue?
I repeat...it is a free board, and abortion is a political issue.
Open another thread with something you want to discuss instead of taking potshots at me. Much more productive use of your time.
Even Al Gore thinks caps and trade is a bad idea!!!
xx
Nazi-cons?
Waterboarding, illegally detaining people, if the president says so, it's legal? The jackboots will be exiting the whitehouse - not entering it.
Yes, but to many Cons, Bush can do no wrong.
off a cliff, they would. As long as they defend his murderous lying ways, we won't get anywhere. How can lying about a sexual escapade be more offensive and damaging to our country than lying about an illegal, immoral war? So, what, they love him because he is a consistent liar, etc.????
It is regrettable you call yourself a **recovering** Democrat, as I find that insulting in itself; do you really think you should be welcomed with open arms to a liberal board by using that term? Often it is the approach that is used that turns people off, as I belive is the case below. I am a Democrat and Democrats frustrate me to no end sometimes, but I would rather drink Drano and gouge my eyes out with a spoon than be a Republican...at least what it means now. There was a time when I respected them, but now I feel nothing but contempt for all they stand for. Neocons have hijacked what was once an honorable party with their fake moral values and hypocrisy which I simply cannot stomach.
And don't get me started on the media wimps.
Yes, it's a pity we can't remain civil in debate and to respect each other's differences and try to get along, but I fear those days are over, as long as people are too busy watching American Idol, et.al., and not paying attention to what is going on around them, defending corruption or, worse yet, remaining silent.
Libs cons. It's just an abbreviation. sm
We can help that their abbr. fits their party the best - cons. Nina may have convinced herself that she comes in peace just to debate, but there was no reason for her to blow up in response to your post here.
LOL! And this is why they're called CONS!
Below she denies saying EXACTLY what she said in her post above, which was:
At any rate, a lot of Democrats cared to.
Bush has his lies on videotape. His groupies have theirs in writing. But it doesn't stop them from trying to CON!
My advice is to ignore these morons. They're not worth the hassle. They are only here to start trouble, have no real desire to debate anything, specialize in personally attacking other posters they've decided to judge and hate without even knowing, and they continue to CON by denying, denying, denying, even when their prior words are IN PRINT a post or two above their denial.
I am totally ignorant about the pros and cons...sm
of bailing anyone out. It is a very scary time. If there was ever a time to pray that politics can be put aside for the good of us all this is it.
Give this board your PROS and CONS about
both candidates. NO BASHING ALLOWED. Let us see what kind of list we have. If you have an opinion or fact, list as O or F accordingly.
Let's talk again if (and when) he takes cons. advice
YIPES the rabid cons are taking over..Run for your lives
Liberals..YIPES..run for your life..this board has been taken over by rabid conservatives..I decided the other day not to read the posts from the conservatives who have the nerve to come over here and start trouble..Their posts are like fungus, they just keep multiplying.
I left for a while when you CONS wouldn't respect the monitor's
request to stay on your own board. I came back to see if anything has changed, and now I see that you're all just as sweet as can be and are actually capable of acting like human beings (NOT!). Just to make you happy, I may decide to stay. You've driven some people from this board, but I'm not as inclined to let you disgust me to that level.
Hugs and kisses, sweetheart. Have a very happy day. *VBS*
Aren't you the one who said CONS was an *innocent* abbreviation? TOO GOOD. LOL!
|
