Re: Right-Wing posters - sm

• Whoopi anybody? - I like her suggestion
  • if they can't afford their house, they should find one they can afford - ...
    • it's not about the people who can't - afford their homes.. nm
      • yes it is - ...
  • And what about the 30% of Americans who rent? - fitz
    • How do you figure that those with mortgages - are getting anything?
      • You misunderstood - I'll speak slower - fitz
        • Maybe you'd better speak slower - Let me see if I get this --
          • Wow - maybe now you know what it feels like to be a Republican - fitz
        • and what about people on fixed incomes who don't have mortgages - ...
    • do you have any suggestions? - it is a mess - nm
      • I support the plan to LOAN the money to the mortage firms in crisis. - fitz
        • not a bad idea. - think it will fly? - nm
          • I would be surprised if it did. - fitz
  • Why should we pay your mortgage? - Tough Noogies
    • i can afford my mortage NOW - but
  • To those who are in foreclosure.... - weekendwarrior
    • I do agree with you about financial irresponsibility - definitely
    • My hubby and I feel that - Chele
      • Always extenuating circumstances - Zville MT
      • is Mr. Chele an - MissThang
        • like anyone who's moniker choice today is "MissThang" has any cred--...sm - hmmmm
          • like anyone WHOSE moniker . . . - MissThang
      • Yes, but when it is your neighbor who overextended - themselves, they will go into foreclosure.
        • That's how the mortgage cookie crumbles! - Tough Noogies
          • do you think they should just bail out - the mortgage companies?
        • I AGREE - nm
  • Rush just said the same thing....give everyone with a mortgage...sm - ms
    • No way - sm
    • Only if every citizen gets $75,000, homeowner or not! - Tough Noogies
      • Re: Right-Wing posters - sm - fitz
        • I tend to agree with the greediness of people... - weekendwarrior
          • I'm not against the idea - sm
            • Credit-Frenzied society - fitz
    • i like the idea of starting at the bottom - instead of the top
    • That would be awesome - sbMT
    • Whoopi would probably have a fit to find out she and Rush agree on - anything!!

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

By right-wing rags I mean publications and internet souces.  the complaint was simply that you use these sources as the unassailable factual basis for your claims.  My point, as well as several other posters in the past, was that you need to use less partisan sources for the "truths" that you post on this board. 

here about the liberal issues, the more we have, the more the bilge from the right will be diluted.  Don't be run off, now girl.

on this board ever consider that this country is lost to yokels and religious fanatics who actually enjoy the vittrole of the Fox nation?  That they elevate a corrupt, sarcastic shrew nobody to a Great New Candidate?  That they actually view anyone from any other country in the world as a scarey fur-i-ner and think that the fact other countries look down upon us is proof we are #1? Our schools have gone steadily downhill.  Our families are falling apart.  There are basically fewer and fewer educated and intelligent people around to see beyond the poison being spoonfed to us by the republicans.  Remember in the Frankenstein movies there was only 1 monster but dozens and dozens of ignorant village people whipped up in a frenzy chasing him with sticks and torches.  We will have the government we deserve.  You can bank on it. 

1. Bush ignored the advice of more than 450 economists, including the Bush administration's own Economic Advisement Council and his own treasury secretary, when they warned that his tax cuts would fail as a growth stimulus, increase inequality and worsen the budget outlook


2. Unemployment rate rose from 4.2% in January 2001 to 6.3% in the first 2-/12 years of the Bush administation.


3. During the first 6 years, income rose an abysmal 1.6%.  Though the inflation rate was at historic lows during those years, (2% to 3%), income failed rise at the same historically low rate.


4. Poverty rates rose from 11.7% in 2001 to 12.7% in the first 6 years.


5. When compared to business cycles from the previous 50 years (1949 to 2000), Bush policies underperformed in terms of GDP, jobs, income and consumption…especially in the jobs sector.  Go here and scroll down to the economic growth section for a really cool graph that illustrates this point.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_policy_of_the_George_W._Bush_administration


6. Income inequality rose as the Bush policies benefitted the top 1% of the income earners.  The Congressional Budget Office, shows that "the average after-tax income of the richest one percent of households rose from $722,000 in 2003 to $868,000 in 2004, after adjusting for inflation, a one-year increase of nearly $146,000, or a whopping 20 percent.  In 2005, the top 1% received its largest share of gross income since 1928. 


7. Total budget surplus for FY 2001 was $128 billion dollars.  Here's how W eliminated that and added to the US public debt: 

Fiscal Year                 Value                           %GDP

2001                            144.5 billion (B)         1.4%

2002                            409.5B                        3.9%2003                            589.0B                        5.5%2004                            605.0B                        5.3%2005                            523.0B                        4.3%2006                            536.5B                        4.1%2007                            459.5B                        3.4%

Notice how the value and %GDP trend reversed under the democratic congress.

8.    Pubs like to blame dems for opposing oversight on Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.  They fail to mention that the 2 times during the Bush administration the issue of an oversight agency was entertained occurred in 2003 and 2005…under republican majorities in both House and Senate.  Those dems must have had some help from somewhere. 

that he is an athiest.  That holds about as much water as the people on this board who said he was DRUNK the other night with O'Reilly.

Show me something factual.

OMG!  You're kidding, right?????? 

WorldNetDaily is a for-profit website that provides primarily evangelical-conservative-oriented news and editorials, publishes letters to the editor, maintains forums and conducts a daily poll.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WorldNetDaily

Conservative far right wing republicans make up 25% of the population of the United States of America. They had eight years to rule and now their time is over.  I understand how confusing this is that your views and aspirations were not fullfilled or appreciated to be elected for another 4 years.  But when you think of the improbability that the views of 25% of the people were represented by the highest office in the world..... really that in and of itself is a miracle and I don't think you fully appreciate how that was a once in a lifetime event.

were from posters from within the U.S.

There are way too many personal attacks, foul language and abusive posts going on here. 

Read the sticky above.  Also read that it is NOT saying to write whatever you want on here. 

We're getting loaded with report after report after report to delete messages from this board. 

Back off and take it easy on people.  Absolutely NO MORE personal attacks.  You don't have to like a candidate, but that doesn't make the poster who does any less of person nor do they deserve to be attacked or belittled or called names. 

The same is true for those that are reporting absolutely every little thing on here.  Read the sticky.  Beware of flaming in these posts.  If you are too sensitive to be on a political board, then please don't read the posts. 

discourage you.  Keep spreading the word.  As a previous O supporter, I knew that he was pro-choice.  I did not, however, know to what extreme.  I simply thought he chose to support Roe v. Wade, as many do.  Had it not been for this board, I never would have researched and found out about the FOCA.  There are people on this board who can still be won over.  Keep on "harping"!!!

The people who are trying to keep religion out of politics are the same ones trying to keep it out of our schools, our money, and ultimately our homes. 

If you have a problem with a post, use the Report Message button at the top of the screen.  Do not post openly about it.

Personal attacks are not going to be left on the board.  Discuss your views and perspectives, debate, argue but leave off personal attacks. 

Every poster here has the right to their own opinion.  As long as there is no inappropriate language, name calling, hate speech or maliciousness, opinions can be expressed.   While "freedom of speech" may be a right in the US, this is a privately owned site and the degree of "freedom" to say what you want is limited to what the board's administration outlines. 

Whether or not you agree with the morality or position of a particular view is something you will have to moderate within yourself.  You can do this by determining what you will and will not read.  Stop with the personal banter trying to "notify" posters you are not reading their posts any longer, etc.  Simply stop. 

Reading the Politics board is an exercise in tolerance, patience and flexibility. 

Feel free to email the moderators or administrator at any time. 

Moderator: Cher  (cher@mtstars.com)

forgot to read the post by the moderator. If they did, they wouldn't be acting so childish.

This used to be a nice place to discuss issues, but no more. It's been taken over by hostile posters. I stayed away for over a month and come back to what???...it's worse then ever!!!! They don't want to discuss issues. They just flame those that have a different opinion.

You have to stay cool and calm and take every post at face value, not get involved in a stupid argument, which is what most of these posts are lately, and not yell or use name-calling.

Freedom of speech does not work on this board and that is why I try not to post anymore. I just read and, sometimes, laugh at some of the most ridiculous ones, then count to 10 if I want to answer in an inflammable way...and leave the board instead.

I need a house. We are living in a basement, the front sided and open so we can have windows, but 3 sides under ground. This was the basement of the home we were going to build on top. Build this place for $10,000 using as much as we could from the old house that was flooded out in ྜ and had to build on higher ground even though we live on a hill.

We won't go into debt now because the county states our place is worth $100,00. Yeah, right. Try to get a loan or HELOC (which we would never do now). We'll live like this until we win the lottery. LOL