Provide a link to the document with that title. None of the official copies I've seen use the wor

Posted By: nm on 2009-04-16
In Reply to: You need to reread the title....... - 'Conservative extremists' is the title.... g

nm

Complete Discussion Below:

marks the location of current message within thread

I guess they are going after the - liberals as well.
- Just as the other NEVER mentioned conservatives, this one doesn't mention liberals... at all. nm - Whatever happened to reading comprehension?
  - Your time may be better spent - sm
  - You need to reread the title....... - 'Conservative extremists' is the title.... g
    - Wrong. Rightwing Extremists, not conservatives. - nm
      - What hate group do you suppose you - should be in..... I can think of one! nm
        Which one is that? - nm
        You're so "bright", you figure it out.... - nm
      - Hmmmm, I didn't realize war veterans fell into - those categories, as stated in the document!
        The document does not state that vets - are terrorists.
        Oh but your "interpretation" is correct no doubt? It is - obvious what is meant............sm
    - Provide a link to the document with that title. None of the official copies I've seen use the wor - nm
      - "Official copies"? Try the copies your PD - have received... nm
        In other words, you can't. Thanks for trying. We have some lovely parting gifts for you. - nm
        You are one of those lazy people who just doesn't - want to look! I found it!!!
        And, once again, where? Lies. nm - put up or shut up time
        Why do you continue to ask "where" when you have - been given an answer..... slow perhaps? NM
        have you bothered to go to your local PD? - Doubt it............. I have! duh!
        Nonsense. - nm
        Stop. Don't waste your energy. - They are so entrenched in their

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database

Don't think you read the same article, THAT IS THE TITLE...see the link I posted...

Would you please provide a link so we can see what it really says?
//

Can you provide a link to what you are saying? Thanks. nm
nm

"Official copies"? Try the copies your PD
xx

Please provide details and link regarding the...sm
42 meth labs in Wasilla. I have not heard of this. Was it while SP was in office as mayor there, or what?

I truly want to know....thanks.

Interesting that you provide a link
directly addresses and refutes your allegations that Snopes is steeped in liberal bias.

Quote:

Is TruthorFiction.com a more reliable source?
TruthorFiction.com has condemned this anonymous attack against Snopes.com and lauded the website as an "excellent" and "authoritative" resource.

What's ironic about the claim that TruthorFiction.com is more reliable than Snopes is that when you compare the contents of the two, their findings rarely diverge in any substantive way (does that mean TruthorFiction.com is biased too?).

Where the sites do differ is in the depth and quality of their coverage. On Snopes.com the Mikkelsons go to great lengths to address the finer details of each text. They supply critical analysis, as well as background and contextual information. They cite sources.

Not to disparage TruthorFiction.com owner Rich Buhler -- who does maintain an up-to-date and generally trustworthy resource -- but by comparison his analyses tend to be perfunctory, and his sourcing minimal at best.

Snopes.com boasts a 12-year record of providing accurate, dependable information and analysis, and in that time has earned the confidence of the media, government agencies, the business community, and the general public alike.
Given all of the above, Snopes is surely the preferable resource.

You cannot type it word for word, just provide a link.
.

PLEASE post links not copies
of entire articles -- the rules clearly state -- rules and regulations -- rules and REGULATIONS!!!!!!

Why aren't you getting it - Snopes is not a credible source. They've been exposed - link inc
They are not credible for putting out truthful information. It is a site run by a couple from California, Barbara and David Mikkelson. They met at an alt.folklore.urban newsgroup. This by no means is a site to find out truth or fiction, especially since the couple is very liberal and choose to put their opinion up rather than fact, and site things as hoaxes when they are not. They are a very liberal couple and of course liberals love this as it always puts their viewpoint in a favorable light, but again this is in no way a credible source. It was recently found that snopes had many things listed as a hoax, when in fact they've been proven to be true. There is another site with better sources and it is called truth or fiction. Attached is an about.com link for info about snopes. But for your everyone's information, do not take snopes to be the truth. Research for yourself with many other links out there.

http://urbanlegends.about.com/od/internet/a/snopes_exposed.htm