P.S.
Posted By: Marmann on 2009-04-08
In Reply to: Genetic testing - Marmann
Regarding your statement about insurance and insuring against what might happen versus what will happen: I have the option of driving a 1980 clunker that carries only liability insurance, and I "might" not ever have an accident, but, as has been pointed out, I'm required by law to insure my vehicle. (In fact, in 40 years of driving, I never HAVE had an accident, yet my vehicle has always been insured, and I've always paid those premiums.) If I drive a Rolls Royce, my insurance premium is going to be much higher because the value of the car being insured is much higher. Same thing with my house: I can either live in a mansion or a two-bedroom bungalow: Either way, my insurance rate is based on my home and its value.
With health insurance, we're all "driving the Rolls Royce" because the rates are the same. A thousand dollars a month is expensive for some people; for others, it's a drop in the bucket. And many times, if a person gets sick and needs to use that health insurance, oftentimes his/her income decreases as he/she becomes sicker, until one day, health insurance premiums cost more than the patient EARNS.
If a patient is very, very poor, they're usually covered. If a patient is very, very rich, there's no problem. But (again, as was pointed out in the "60 Minutes" piece, this problem is affecting MIDDLE CLASS people.
Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old. To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
|