Obama is reviewing the status of the prisoners... sm

• Not at all happy with the first step - our new president is making.
  • Face it - some of you Debbie-Downers won't be - happy with ANYthing he does.
    • Kinda sorta like all you peppy eppy upper dupper cheerleaders. - Yeah, we get it.
      • One word: "PROZAC". - (works wonders)
    • I have the same feeling. I hear the background noise already nm - Mrs. M
  • Nah, you are misinformed. Obama is doing the right thing for all of us. nm - Mrs. M
    • Care to explain? - Curious. No message below
      • yes, I will explain human rights to you now sm - Mrs. M
        • Yes, I suppose you've spoken with all of Gitmo - prisoners yourself and sm
          • You got that one wrong... ! - Don
        • Obama's suspension request draws IMMEDIATE PRAISE from across the globe. - Mrs. M
          • Ok, answer me this - Crabbyolebroad
            • It's a little thing called human rights! - sm
              • Exactly right, we all deserve human rights, ALL OF GOD'S CHILDREN, MUSLIM, WHITE, RACIST, REPUB, - Mrs. M
            • I read your post and thank goodness you are not in charge sm - Don
              • Yes, - Crabbyolebroad
                • Ever hear of TWO WRONGS DON'T MAKE A RIGHT? sheesh you are limited - Mrs. M
                  • Actually yes I do - Crabbyolebroad
                    • Crabby, message inside - Mrs. M
                      • Ooooo nice side of the mouth slight - Crabbyolebroad
                        • Uncle Tom's Cabin has nothing to do with anything nm - nm
  • I'm thrilled that he is closing Gitmo! - Bushwacked
    • I'm thrilled at what Obama is doing with GITMO, are you kidding? - Christian without the hate
    • Fine, YOU can have the terrorists live - with you.
      • I heard they moved to Texas already. nm - Mrs. M
        • and they can HAVE Texas! - nm
          • I know! Such a disgusting state! nm - Don
        • Interesting... - Crabbyolebroad
          • Are you seriously calling OBAMA a terrorist? shame on you and ... unAmerican, unpatriotic! - Don
            • Tit for tat - Crabbyolebroad
              • Okay, I will tell you why - Don
                • Technically... - Zville MT
                • Yes I can say that - Crabbyolebroad
                  • You are more unpatriotic.... and fascist - Don
                    • Don, Don, Don - Crabbyolebroad
                      • You just don't have the capacity to understand I'm afraid... see ya, not responding anymore nm - Don
                        • Ahhhhhhhh have - Crabbyolebroad
            • He likes to hang around them. - Not saying he is one, but thinks
              • You have it opposite! It's HUMAN rights at stake... gosh! duh - Don
                • Human rights is getting way twisted - just like this world.
        • Closing Gitmo is not as simple as simple - PEOPLE think. This could be disastrous.nm
          • Obama is reviewing the status of the prisoners... sm - Mrs. M
          • Thank you, besides, this would should not be the first - thing on the priority list for the fist day
        • You're right... - Bushwacked
          • Wow! If Obama is anything like you, since - U voted for him, Lord help us all.

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

This argument validates the lawsuit, so it would seem to not be so frivolous.  Can't argue about the facts.

************************************

It seems that Barack Obama is not qualified to be president after all for the following reason:

Barack Obama is not legally a U.S. natural-born citizen according to the law on the books at the time of his birth, which falls between " December 24, 1952 to November 13, 1986? . Presidential office requires a natural-born citizen if the child was not born to two U.S. citizen parents, which of course is what exempts John McCain though he was born in the Panama Canal. US Law very clearly stipulates: ".If only one parent was a U.S. citizen at the time of your birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for at least ten years, at least five of which had to be after the age of 16." Barack Obama's father was not a U.S. citizen and Obama's mother was only 18 when Obama was born, which mea ns though she had been a U.S. citizen for 10 years, (or citizen perhaps because of Hawai'i being a territory) the mother fails the test for being so for at least 5 years **prior to** Barack Obama's birth, but *after* age 16 It doesn't matter *after*. In essence, she was not old enough to qualify her son for automatic U.S. citizenship. At most, there were only 2 years elapsed since his mother turned 16 at the time of Barack Obama's birth when she was 18 in Hawai'i. His mother would have needed to have been 16+5= 21 years old, at the time of Barack Obama's birth for him to have been a natural-born citizen. As aforementioned, she was a young college student at the time and was not. Barack Obama was already 3 years old at that time his mother would have needed to have waited to have him as the only U.S. Citizen parent.

 Obama instead should have been naturalized, but even then, that would still disqualify him from holding the office.

*** Naturalized citizens are ineligible to hold the office of President *** Though Barack Obama was sent back to Hawaii at age 10, all the other info does not matter because his mother is the one who needed to have been a U.S. citizen for 10 years prior to his birth on August 4, 1961, with 5 of those years being after age 16. Further, Obama may have had to have remained in the country for some time to protect any citizenship he would have had, rather than living in Indonesia. Now you can see why Obama's aides stopped his speech about how we technically have more than 50 states, because it would have led to this discovery. This is very clear cut and a blaring violation of U.S. election law. I think the Gov. of California would be very interested in knowing this if Obama were elected President without being a natural-born U.S. citizen, and it would set precedence.

Got it on good authority. 

Investors are not fools.  It's only left-wingers who get it to up tick for a day or so, that's all.  The rest of America ain't buying Obama's sudden "positive" attitude.  They know it is a calculated and phony positive.  Fools rush in, you know.  Ain't nothing more foolish than a left-winger Obama worshiper. 

Guess he owes her big time, huh?

I happened to find this link, which provides a LOT of interesting facts about Bush. 

http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/jphuck/Book4Ch.3.html

Bush first became concerned about his alleged AWOL status in 1998, when he was running for a second term as governor, about allegations that he was given preferential treatment to land a slot in the Air National Guard. So he retained an attorney, Harriet Miers who was paid $19,000 to investigate the issue. She and her aides concluded that Barnes had helped Bush land a slot in the Air National Guard in 1968 after being lobbied by Adger. Miers spoke with Barnes who acknowledged that he had never talked to Bush’s father about asking for the favor. Adger was already deceased, and since that time Barnes passed away. Bush knew that he was off the hook.

Obama has shown great judgment in the people who surround him.  He picked a great VP choice, and his wife is impeccable as a helpmate and is a fantastic role model for the American children.   

I believe Obama has an awesome political future.  He sure is a bright light, and he would be someone I would seriously consider voting for.

Someone I like even better is Rep. Harold Ford from Tennessee.  Every time I hear this man speak, I like him more and more and more.

I think there are lots of good candidates out there who don't fit the profiles you outlined, which I also believe to be true, and I think we're well overdue in considering those candidates because, in my opinion, what we've been offered in the last several elections -- on BOTH sides -- has been pretty pitiful.  The "box" isn't working, and it's time to look outside of it.

If we get Obama or any of the other candidates we will get more of the same. War and taxes. Empire building. If you like that kind of stuff, vote for any of the candidates EXCEPT.......... RON PAUL. The only candidate for peace, limited government and minding our own business.

Haven't seen any posts here for awhile.  Very excited about the outcome of tonight's election.  I am so glad to see that people are not buying the "gimmicks" Hillary proposed.  Gas tax holiday?...give me a break!  Someone needed to ask her, "So what happens when the holiday is over", you charge back up the gas price! 

The big joke is that Bill Clinton raised the gas tax in his first year in office.  It was included in a package of tax increases that amounted to the biggest tax increase in history.  It was raised by 4.3 cents.  Not only did he raise the gas tax, but he wanted to raise it even higher.

So you should all get this straight...Hillary is "claiming" she would give drivers 3 whole months (wow - imagine that) 18 cent a gallon cut after her husband forced drivers to pay an extra 5 cents for 15 years.

Unfortunately there were some people who bought into her pandering (which by the way is another word for lying), but thank goodness enough people with an education and most important most of the with common sense could see right through her lies.

Way to go North Carolina - I'm so pleased.  And Indiana too.  It was a close race thank goodness.

Now she needs to step down.  Why?  Because its the right thing to do.  Do the numbers.  There is no way she can win and anyone who believes so needs to wake up.  What we need is for her to support Barack Obama (that is if she's telling the truth about the most important thing is nominating a democrat for president).  Somehow though I do not believe she has the best interest of the party or the american people in mind.  Her goal is to serve herself.  She needs to graciously bow out and put all her efforts into getting a democrat in the office.

P.S. - Note to the "ditto heads".  Maybe we should rename Limbaugh followers "dumbo heads".  Not only did your little plan fail Mr. Limbo, but it failed badly.  In a poll taken (and yes I know polls can be misleading), but not only did the republicans change parties to vote for a democrat but the majority of them voted for Obama.  Then on top of that over 75% of republicans that voted as democrats said that Obama could be McCain (or as I am hearing him being referred to as McBush), but only around 25% said they believed Hillary could win.  So not only does Hillary need to do the math, so does Mr. Limbo.

He's just a talking head, somebody's puppet, aint nothing without his teleprompter and written speeches...gimme a break!

help these people so they can continue to sit on their butts and do something while the rest of us bust our humps.  No thank you! 

With RNC behind us now, dems are faced with the daunting challenge of making the 2008 election a referendum on issues, not a personality contest.  Here are 2 links that got thrown under the bash bus. 

http://www.alternet.org/election08/97198/top_ten_most_disturbing_facts_and_impressions_of_sarah_palin/

http://www.alternet.org/election08/97350/8_more_shocking_revelations_about_sarah_palin/?page=3

Though the title of these articles may lead one to conclude it is more about Palin bashing, there is a gold mine of pertinent information to be found there.  Embedded within the articles are more links that are overwhelming on first inspection, but well worth the time it takes to review them.  Laid out there between the lines is a structured blueprint for facing the upcoming 60 days with effective campaign strategy. 

There is another post that also got buried in the mud which will be brought back up to the top momentarily on issues.  If it get buries again, it will be brought back up to the top again.  The bashes it may inspire will be ignored.  The issues will continue to get the focus. 

There is another battleground in this election aside from the issues push.  It is the one fought on the field of values and vision; specifically, the Obama vision versus the McCain/Palin vision of what kind of America they/we see in our futures and what sort of change each candidate promises to deliver.  The link below is an article that addresses this subject.  It is a self-effacing piece I believe dems should take to heart when considering how to frame their upcoming campaign tactics.  Here's that link.  

http://www.alternet.org/election08/97193/the_palin_choice%3A_the_reality_of_voters%27_minds/

The introduction to this post expresses a basic premise from which I will be operating.  I will not be diminishing the power of Obama's message by indulging in petty squabbles, dead-end distractions, one-upmanship and a race to get the last word.  There is important work here, people, and we best rolls up our sleeves and get started. 

Countdown Monday night.  Can't wait.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/08/obamas_craftiness.html

under your bed?  I read the black arms and then the rest and can only see the reason to post this on a politics board is . . .