No they were not....don't twist what little facts that were in those links..nm

• Change - Chicago Style - Me
  • Chicago is no different that any other big city...sm - oldtimer
  • Let's talk about the 42 meth labs in Wasilla or - Mike W
    • Please provide details and link regarding the...sm - ms
      • Story about Wasilla meth labs from Juneau news sm - Mike W
      • Here is the link to "WASILLA", Alaska's meth capital but sm - Barlyston
        • Thanks for the links....sm - ms
          • I suppose the meth labs just sprung up after she was Mayor, eh? (nm) - Get a Grip
            • I do have a grip. If she knew about them, she would have - ms
              • In fact, the number of labs increased after Palin became mayor nm - Barlyston
                • I suppose that may be true, but you give no facts, just your opinion...nm - indy
                  • The facts were given in the links above in the thread nm - pay attention
                    • No they were not....don't twist what little facts that were in those links..nm - nm
                      • Wasilla has only 8,000 pop, so even 1 meth lab is a lot and - Bush ruined our country and
                        • name calling and finger pointing, again with no real facts but your opinion. sm - nm
  • When Barack wins, you guys are never going to let up are you........nm - Barlyston
    • Probably not...sm - ms
  • Wow, if this is all true....just boggles the mind, doesn't it...thanks for posting....nm - ms
  • Thanks for posting this :) - nm
    • Whew - guess it's not a repeat then. - Me

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

If you check the archives you will see multiple requests to folks to stick to their own boards.  I have no reason to lie about this but apparently you do.  And it is so very easily verified.  My advice to you is that if you continue to lie to not pick such obvious lies to tell.

As far as the other board, it seemed the liberals stayed off it for a while and there is still very little liberal activity on it.  Check it out.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c108:S.2020:

below is an exert.  The link above is the bill.

SEC. 4. INTERFERENCE WITH REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROHIBITED.

(a) STATEMENT OF POLICY- It is the policy of the United States that every woman has the fundamental right to choose to bear a child, to terminate a pregnancy prior to fetal viability, or to terminate a pregnancy after fetal viability when necessary to protect the life or health of the woman.

(b) PROHIBITION OF INTERFERENCE- A government may not--

(1) deny or interfere with a woman's right to choose--

(A) to bear a child;

(B) to terminate a pregnancy prior to viability; or

(C) to terminate a pregnancy after viability where termination is necessary to protect the life or health of the woman; or

(2) discriminate against the exercise of the rights set forth in paragraph (1) in the regulation or provision of benefits, facilities, services, or information.

(c) CIVIL ACTION- An individual aggrieved by a violation of this section may obtain appropriate relief (including relief against a government) in a civil action.

I do not understand why so many links are put on this board?

On a blog forum one should put one's own opinion, not what is posted on the internet.  At least one should put it in one's own words.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=15918

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/21/AR2006062101837.html

http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htchem/articles/20060123.aspx

Warning:  On this first one there are some terrible pics, but I posted this for the text.

http://www.staticbrain.com/archive/pentagon-censors-soldiers-access-to-internet/

On this one, please note where he says *When you’re in an environment where you don’t have access to any information sources, independent or otherwise, all you can do is conjecture. We didn’t have any access to newspapers or the Internet. *

http://www.berkeleydailyplanet.com/issue/2008-03-14/article/29458?headline=Iraq-Veteran-Speaks-Out-Against-War

Here's a reality check for you:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOj7Nxcn6gg&feature=related

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iVg2jiaBA1jwVfCdsisXI0FbZD0AD965BKCG0

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29030191/

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/01/019637.php

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1200572509823&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull