NAFTA
Posted By: human rights on 2008-11-17
In Reply to:
US companies that profit from NAFTA in Mexico, exploiting and not protecting workers.
http://www.amnestyusa.org/artists-for-amnesty/bordertown/page.do?id=1101531
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
he signed NAFTA, and now
my job's gone over there, over there, and it won't be back, naw, it ain't ever coming back, and the buck won't stop until it's gone over there.
ditto all you said.
Obama has been on both sides of NAFTA....
which side do you believe?
"Citizen of the world" Obama...who talks about the "world" economy more than he talks about the US economy...and how they are linked? And rather than saying not to offshore, saying educate our people so they can compete?
Raising taxes on corporations that encourages offshoring?
GP, you need to look at your guy as hard as you are looking at McCain.
Republican Congress came up with NAFTA
AND at the time Clinton supported it - with the belief it would keep the Mexicans in Mexico. Truth be told, they started outsourcing our jobs in the 80s - GM closed 11 plants in Michigan and opened 9 in Mexico - paying the Mexicans 7 cents per hour. I guess they did not abolish slavery in Mexico.
|
