Jon Stewart - "The Miami Seven" sm

• This is hilarious! - PK
  • Chris was so tasteless and had the nerve to say he was trying to have dialouge...nm - Democrat
    • Who leaked it? The answer: - PK
    • actually there is a message inside above..nm - Democrat
  • Link doesn't work. - worldview
    • They must have removed it. I guess it's not surprising.. - PK
  • Jon Stewart - "The Miami Seven" sm - LVMT
    • LOL! Thanks, LVMT. - PK
    • Good one! Check this out - too - see link - Starcat
      • LOL!! - PK
  • He should not have stormed off. sm - MT2

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

This is hilarious!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2006/09/11/video-jon-stewart-bush_n_29247.html

To all you GEICO fans out there:  Little Richard translates for Bush.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2006/09/13/video-little-richard-tra_n_29379.html

but I really am concerned that the humor and personal attacks are distracting people from the true issue of the future of our country.  It is not important to me what a candidate eats or how well they dance. I don't need the candidate to be "like me."  I want the cream of the crop, the person who reads historical biographies for fun and does crosswords in ink. We simply cannot elect the same policies over and over and expect different results. Let's hear concrete plans, not slogans.

http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/index.jhtml?episodeId=220533

Thank you Jon!

...overseer of the TARP Program.  Though it's pretty funny, it's also very informative and explained in a way that most people can "get," and I highly recommend it to those who are interested.

It's a two-part video, and I believe it's worth watching, though, unfortunately, some people will probably criticize it without even bothering to watch it in its entirety).

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/16/elizabeth-warren-makes-jo_n_187635.html

...overseer of the TARP Program.  Though it's pretty funny, it's also very informative and explained in a way that most people can "get" (in a Jim Cramer/Jon Stewart interview kind of way), and I highly recommend it to those who are interested.

It's a two-part video, and I believe it's worth watching, though, unfortunately, some people will probably criticize it without even bothering to watch it in its entirety).

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/16/elizabeth-warren-makes-jo_n_187635.html

I tried to email you and don't think I had a problem, but please check your email to see if you received anything from me.  (Hope so.)

Will be leaving the computer for a bit but will be back later this afternoon.

Have a great day! 

American citizens practing their right to free speech.

Remember in the last couple of months when McCain announced, "Today, we are all Georgians"?

I think Putin is taking a "wait and see" approach to the new USA President.  Bush has certainly heated up the "Cold War" during his eight years in office.  While there is not much reason to trust Putin, there's even less reason for Putin to trust the USA.

We can't forget the conflict between Georgia and South Ossetia and, more importantly, the sequence of events related to that conflict.  I would encourage anyone who has forgotten that Georgia was the aggressor (with our help) to click on the link below.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/oct/31/russia-georgia

to use them, to create even more havoc, wars, etc.

I'll feel much safer after Obama takes his oath of office (assuming he actually has the opportunity to do so).

Try watching the morning news at 6 a.m. or during the day until 5-6 p.m. That's the news I'm talking about.

O'Reilly and the others are like Chris Matthews, Keith Oberman, and all those other fellas. They are more like a political talk shows. That's not news.

The Audacity of FOCA

BY The Editors

October 19-25, 2008 Issue | Posted 10/14/08 at 10:00 AM

As the election quickly approaches, the U.S. bishops are shining a harsh spotlight on one bill: the Freedom of Choice Act, commonly called FOCA. FOCA is again before Congress; its chief sponsor in the Senate is Barbara Boxer and one of its co-sponsors is presidential candidate Barack Obama.

In July 2007, Obama told a Planned Parenthood audience: “The first thing I’d do as president is sign the Freedom of Choice Act.” Search YouTube.com for the words “Obama” and “FOCA” to hear it for yourself. Since Obama has said that signing FOCA into law would be his first priority as a new president, summarizing the bill answers the question: For what change does Barack Obama have the audacity to hope?

The U.S. bishops’ summary of FOCA points out:

• It creates a “fundamental right” to abortion throughout the nine months of pregnancy. No governmental body at any level would be able to “deny or interfere with” this right, or to “discriminate” against the exercise of this right “in the regulation or provision of benefits, facilities, services, or information.” For the first time, abortion would become an entitlement the government must condone and promote.

• Some states require that women be told about the risks of abortion. FOCA would erase all informed-consent laws states have enacted.

• Many states require that parents be informed and sign off on their daughters’ abortions, just as they are informed and involved in every other surgical procedure. FOCA would override and end all parental-involvement laws.

• Some states have laws promoting maternal health. Obama’s FOCA wouldn’t allow them.

• Regulation on abortion “clinics” helps keep these businesses responding to health and safety concerns. FOCA would end these regulations.

• FOCA would disallow “government programs and facilities that pay for or promote childbirth and other health care without subsidizing abortion,” say the U.S. bishops.

• Conscience-protection laws would end. These currently allow Catholic and other pro-life hospitals, doctors, medical students and health-care workers to opt out of participating in abortion in many places.

• After FOCA, any laws that prohibit a particular abortion procedure, such as partial-birth abortion, will no longer be in force.

• FOCA would also strike laws requiring that abortions only be performed by a licensed physician.

For a careful legal analysis of FOCA by the U.S. bishops’ Office of General Counsel, or a summary fact sheet to distribute, see NCHLA.org.

In a Sept. 19 letter to members of Congress, Cardinal Justin Rigali, chairman of the bishops’ Committee on Pro-Life Activities, raised the bishops’ concerns about any possible consideration of FOCA.

“Despite its deceptive title, FOCA would deprive the American people in all 50 states of the freedom they now have to enact modest restraints and regulations on the abortion industry,” wrote Cardinal Rigali. It would also “counteract any and all sincere efforts by government to reduce abortions in our country.”

http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=224262&title=Elizabeth-Warren-Pt.-2

Wow, common sense!!

the bit about the open microphone on McCain during the debate was brilliant!!! I laughed until I literally cried!!  By the way, Michelle Obama was warm, intelligent, sincere and very much First Lady material!!!