It's amazing how fast you can backpeddle
Posted By: huh? on 2006-08-13
In Reply to: Linked to a Jewish blog? I assume someone from sm - LVMT
You have made some very anti-semetic remarks about the Israeli's, and now you are being called on the carpet about it. You've documented several times with your supporting remarks of the Muslim protestors in Washington (which I've failed to find any reference to besides your obscure article link) that you think Israel and the U.S. are mean murderous tyrannically-governed countries. If you are going to take a side take a side, but your attempt to suddenly appear tolerant in the presence of a Jewish person is VERY disingenous, and I for one don't by it for a second. Pick a side and stick to it. If you don't support Israel then stand by your assertions. If you do support Israel then you need to make yourself a little clearer, because all I see you doing is siding with Hezbollah.
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
Amazing...absolutely amazing...
high fiving hate speech.
Not so fast!!!!!!
I understand where you're coming from but really...do you REALLY think now days abortion is just because men want a woman to have one? Women are more permiscuous than ever, starting at younger and younger ages, and THEY don't want a child.
I knew of a woman back in the early 70's when abortion was legal on in a couple of states. She had just started college, found out she was pregnant. The man she said was the father begged her to marry him...he wanted to take responsibility but she didn't want to lose her scholarship. Lose a scholarship....murder a child. What a decision to make!! No, I don't always blame the men because I witnessed a very selfish woman who could have cared less. She came from a family who thought they were on the high social ladder as did she, and she certainly wasn't going to waste her time with a baby!!! She had more important things to do BUT I may add, she certainly didn't waste any time making her rounds with the guys back at college. So, please keep in mind, there really are a lot of women who really do not see it as that important an issue. They too just want to have fun and not deal with the consequences either.
Not so fast....
Palin was never a member of the Alaskan Independence Party. I can find no credible evidence that she supported them or funded them. She did address their convention, but then Obama addressed the convention for ACORN.
From The New York Times: Alaskan Independence Party officials released a statement Monday saying that Ms. Palin had been a member for two years, from 1994 to 1996, information included in reports in The New York Times and other news outlets. In Internet videos of recent party meetings, other party officials can be seen boasting of Ms. Palin’s past membership.
On Tuesday, though, the party’s chairwoman, Lynette Clark, said the earlier statement was false. Ms. Clark said that she had based it on information another party member had given her, but that a review of the records showed only that Ms. Palin had attended the 1994 conference.
Ms. Clark added that while the review confirmed Todd Palin as a member, it did not indicate that Ms. Palin had been one.
On Wednesday, Ms. Clark released a corrected statement, saying, in part, “I, foolishly, repeated and accepted as fact what an officer of this membership shared with myself, and husband Dexter Clark, over a year ago.”
“I humbly apologize to Governor Palin, and to both national and local press and media,” she added.
Perhaps you did not do enough research?
As to the power and role of the Vice President...what she is talking about IS in the constitution. The Vice President presides over the senate and can be present whenever they are if the VP so wishes. Good for her. SOMEBODY needs to be watching them, I would think this recent financial crisis would tell us that. She is not talking about changing the CONSTITUTION. She is talking about exercising the rights it gives the position. No other VP has been interested in doing so. No reason she...or any VP...shouldn't. Read what the Constitution says about the VP position.
Well....not so fast....
we won't know until election night, I firmly believe that. The polls are closing fast, but I don't put much stock in polls, never have.
Whatever the outcome, if a majority of poor misguided folks vote Obama in...it won't be with my help. Got my yard sign. :-)
Going under fast, aren't they.
Starting to sound a mite peeved:) Look, person - we KNOW some people support this screw-up of a profiteering war. Like you. What don't you get about that? WE KNOW.
Now, tell us YOU KNOW that just as many - to judge by the 300,000 versus the 300, ONE HUNDRED times as many DO NOT support this mess any longer.
Why do you seem to feel that people who agree with you are somehow PROOF that yours is the only way to think? What are you going to do about the REST of those who do not believe what you do? What are you going to do when soldiers are speaking 100,000 to 1 against the war? You better think about it, because it's shaping up that way.
I bet it will drop as fast as it did
x
don't back down so fast, other facts about him
ok snopes disputed the rumors, some of the rumors but facts are facts and Barack's 1st cousin is this extremist running Kenya and involved in the genocide....google it for yourself.
Obama's muslim cousin Odinga executing genocide in Kenya ... I'm Barack Obama's cousin says Raila Odinga Kenya's defeated presidential challenger Raila ...
www.sqlspace.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=52220&view=next - 45k - Cached - Similar pages |
The leader of the Kenyan Orange Democratic Movement opposition leader, Raila Odinga, is Barack Obama’s cousin. Barack may not put much stock in the ...
groups.msn.com/ISLAMICZIONISM/general.msnw?action=get_message&mview=1&ID_Message=10375 - 27k - Cached - Similar pages |
Not about how fast Rome was built....
but how fast it FELL.
I know I'm learning real fast here
I keep seeing posts about how awful the republicans are, blah, blah, blah. Then comes the lies and false statement without any facts. But the minute you put something out there about Obama with a link and reliable sources you get jumped on and called evil. I'll tell ya, makes me think Hitler is still alive and visits this board. HA HA. I've seen the attacks on Sam before so I guess I should have realized this. Guess it just shocked me.
I can't write too fast anymore, but here's what I did get
1. Fiscal Stimulus Plan: Before or after inauguration (sp). Wants to get it moving quickly, but if he has to wait until January 20, so be it, but states he will try during these couple months to push one through now.
2. Retooling assistance plan for automakers for fuel-effieicnt cars. He realizes that the auto industry employs thousands and other companies depend on the auto industry for their jobs. Wants this package done quickly.
3. Review implementaion of plans and not rewarding management for housing problems that are caused.
4. Grow middle class in the long term.
Reporters asked questions but couldn't get them all.
1. He wants to help the states financially.
2. As to going to other countries for conferences: He is developing a team and weighing all his options. Iran's nuclear weapons are unacceptable along with the militants. This has to cease. It's not something he can do in a knee-jerk fashion and wants to be careful (not to p--s them off).
3. Tax plan: 95% of WORKING Americans will get it. His first goal is tax relief for struggling families and to build the economy from the bottom up.
That's all I could get.
Not so fast Mrs. M.....Democrats started
nm
the problem with responding too fast
...is that you end up leaving out important phrases!
The $72 an hour figure quoted in the article, I should have said, isn't made of *just* the wages and benefits of current employees--it's also including those paid to retired workers, the ones who paid into the retirement fund their whole lives, and are now living off those benefits.
In other words, you take the wages/benefits paid to the current 180,000 or so autoworkers, PLUS those paid to the 400,000 or so retirees and the 120,000 spouses of dead retirees, then divide that by the 180,000 current workers, then say, LOOK HOW MUCH THOSE GUYS GET PAID! It's an incredibly artifically inflated number.
And noooo one in the media ever seems to question it.
Not so fast. Comparative drug use exercise.
There is a distinction between these two types of cocaine/crack use, as expressed in a medical study entitled "Crack cocaine and cocaine hydrochloride: Are the differences myth or reality?"
http://www.cocaine.org/crack/index.html
"...evidence exists showing a greater abuse liability, greater propensity for dependence, and more severe consequences when cocaine is smoked (cocaine-base) or injected intravenously (cocaine hydrochloride) compared with intranasal use (cocaine hydrochloride)." There is also evidence that crack cocaine use is linked to a higher incidence crime/violent crime than the use of "blow." Next time you set out to assasignate someone's character, remember you will be a whole lot more credible with (a) a little more research, and (b) a little less exaggeration.
Obama did not quantify his use in the book. He only defined the time span as sometime during his high school senior year until he arrived in New York to attend Columbia University, to include his 2 years at Occidental College (1979-1981). This would mean that he experimented with drugs at ages 17, 18 and 19 while in his teens. He decided to stop the drug use on his own accord. He then turned around and wrote about this experience in his first book, "Dreams From My Father," which started out as a commissioned book on race relations that later evolved into an autobiography. He began writing the book in 1990 and it was published in mid 1995, a year before he ran for office. It is worth noting that he was not forced to include this information in the book....he chose to. He disclosed one of his "greatest regrets," (his words) within the context of an honest, sincere, and direct expression of its (drug use) relationship to race relations and biographical information. Political agenda does not seem to be the motivation.
Cindy McCain's addiction ensued at the adult age of 35, nine years into her marriage, as a mother of three children, ages 5, 3 and 1. Her addiction spanned 3 years, about the same as Obama's "experimental" use. However, her disclosure (even to her husband) was not voluntary. John McCain was informed of her addiction during a forced (birth) family intervention, who then at the ripe adult age of 52, proceeded to engineer the "diversion program" cover-up/escape of criminal charges as described in the other post and in the midst of an active DEA investigation and pending criminal trial.
Aside from the drug addiction, involving an AVMT MD in providing her with illegal prescriptions and stealing drugs, it seems that there were a few more fires John McCain sought to extinguish. Seems she had approached a member of AVMT's voluntary medical team, demanding that he commit perjury in adoption proceedings of her Bangladeshi baby daughter and had attempted to "prevent" a former foundation employee from giving accurate information to the DEA during it's investigation. Further allegations were made that Cindy had abused her husband's office and diplomatic privileges by transporting illegal substances overseas. Of course, none of these issues were ever formally aired during court proceedings, since John McCain was able to succeed in "diverting" this embarrassing disaster.
So let's see, she comes clean to her husband under the threat of criminal charges, public humiliation and the tangible possibility of ruining her husband's career and is okay with having other people perjure themselves to gain approval for bringing a 4th child/infant into the mix of the not-so-remote drug addiction. Looks like the money and political clout has served her well in staying out of prison, bypassing adoption standards and abusing her own authority over foundation MDs and employees. Also looks like her disclosure did have elements of political agenda as she sought to save her own behind.
Drug use is drug use. But age, context, duration, type, criminality and injury to other parties are also part of this picture. It is not hard to figure out where Obama's policies come from with regard to medical treatment versus incarceration for first-time users and/or non-violent drug offenses. On the other hand, where John McCain's lock-'em-down and shun-'em drug policies defy logic and fly in the face of how he decided to handle the situation when it was HIS house, HIS wife, HIS job and HIS future on the line.
No offense taken. Rumors spread so fast, especially ...sm
bad rumors intended to scare and manipulate people. I think the excitement of the people at his rallies is because they see him as someone who offers the common people hope. He has never addressed or dwelled on any of the many, many rumors being spread about him. I believe he is an upstanding American citizen, a Christian, who has a lovely wife and family and is nothing like what the right wing of the republican party is painting him to be. Keep praying on it but don't get taken in by people who are not so Christian themselves.
Woohoo...change is coming fast and furious.
President Obama just announced that the pay of top White House employees is being frozen. The Associated Press says it will affect those in positions paying more than $100,000 a year.
"All of you are committed to building a more responsible government," Obama told top staff at a meeting now underway at the White House.
"Families are tightening their belts and so should Washington," Obama added.
The president also announced he's about to sign new ethics rules designed to restrict lobbying by current staff after they leave the administration.
That's why Fox news rating are skyrocketing with MSNBC and CNN are going down fast
Fox News - 1,217,000
CNN - 633,000
MSNBC - 482,000
I was surprised to see that CNN has more viewers than MSNBC. Fox news gives you the news and tells you everything - both sides. The other two don't. They just feed you garbage all day.
To counter the DNC assertion that only McCain plays fast and loose with the truth...
apparently he is not alone.
HMMM...check THIS out...
http://obamalies.net/
YOU NEED TO LISTEN TO THIS ONE....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_S5StlCcv84&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72B3tUAqpo4&feature=related
http://obamawtf.blogspot.com/2008/05/documented-lie-50-obama-claimed-he-had.html
http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/fashion-shows/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EY5CQnOn75c
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HKlQSNN2zo&NR=1
whoops, typing too fast and made errors .. be 4 the spelling police get me
s
Amazing. nm
Amazing. sm
an actual talking....oh never mind.
Wow, you are amazing...
There hasn't even been a trial yet, and when there is one I'm quite sure YOU won't be invited to hear the testimony, you've never met a single one of these people in your life, and YOU know all the facts. You certainly are amazing.
Amazing
I didn't specify who I was talking about when I said there are some people on this board who distort the truth and make things up. But the ones I see doing that the most are the ones who posted a reply to my observation and were on the defensive when the did.
Amazing....
Overlook a terrorist buddy, 20 years of black liberation theology and economic parity (redistribution of wealth, socialim), his Chicago ties, being second on the Fannie/Freddie gimme list in the face of this crisis...that is a failure to recognize duck pucky, ducky wucky.
:)
Respectfully.
I think it is amazing s/m
that people on this board seem incapable of discussing both sides of an issue. The pubs keep on pubbing and the dems keep on deming.
It's always amazing
how Democrats who always want to "help" the poor are always FILTHY RICH. But, of course, you never hear a democrat say RICH democrat party, but they always go on and on about the rich republican party. Rich is always a bad word when used alongside republican, but never democrat. Such hypocricy really, because it really brings home the fact that people will vote anything into office to get a free buck, even the RICH democrats. BTW, I am independent..... rich and poor there too.
Isn't it amazing
that a lot of our "laws" are laws that are also spoken of in the Bible? Wonder if that is a coincidence?
I've heard that most prisoners "get religion" when the are incarcerated. I have heard they embrace all kinds of religion including wiccianism (if that's a word). I don't know if this is true or not but lacking anything better to do at the moment, I think I'll research it as it strikes my interest.
Amazing....
In spite of all the christian values expressed on this board and elsewhere, republicans are still willing to vote for a convicted felon. I do understand the reasoning for him winning. He gets the seat, gets kicked out of the senate and another pub gets appointed. The question is, are you really willing to sacrifice your christian beliefs in order to get your way?
What is so amazing? sm
The majority of people voted for this. How does that differ from the majority of people voting for Obama?
Rhetorical question, of course.
Amazing...(sm)
Who said anything about the US being the head of that one-world government?
I have no idea. I didn't. I said under the same rule -- not necessarily under US rule.
I don't believe that the US will even exist as we know it by the time the one-world government comes into effect, much less have any power in a one-world government.
One can only hope.
And it is not based on speculation. It is based on the book of Revelation.
Why is it that when someone on this board says anything about relgion having a negative impact on legislation you guys get all upset, but when we look at the future of our government it's supposed to based on a 2000-year-old ghost story?  Why don't we just start looking into crystal balls.
Amazing..........sm
I think this lends a great deal of credance to the theory that this election was engineered from the get-go and Obama was manufactured for this from birth. Probably the scariest thing is that over half the people in the US will never believe this, even with documentations staring them rignt in the face, and will just holler "sore losers" even louder than before.
I found this post there interesting: "Not directly related to the original subject of our thread but the Reverend Joseph Lowery is going to be giving the major benediction at the Obama inauguration. Although the NY Times and Washington Post will not mention it, Lowery was the recipient of a free trip to Lybia courtesy of Muamar Qadafi and Lowery took the trip at a time when Qadafi was openly calling for attacks on America. Lowery’s junket was courtesy of the Lybian dicator who ordered the bombing of a disco in West Germany where American GIs hung out. An African-American was murdered due to Qadafi’s terrorism. And Lowery did not make a peep of protest. I can’t help but wonder why the NY Times won’t touch the issue of Lowery getting a nice goodybag from Qadafi. And Lowery’s comments about Israel and essentially about American Jews are vile. He is like Reverend Wright, albeit with a braver personal life story. But Lowery needs to be exposed for what he is." But of course, he is ONLY giving the benediction, so no need for the rabid right to get all bent out of shape about it. Still, the left hollers about Warren and his biblical stance against homosexual marriage, probably the only truly biblical stance the man has, but it's a start.
I would say that America has made a huge, huge mistake, but I think Obama would have gotten in even if every voter had voted for Santa Claus on a write in. We are in big trouble, folks. 
Amazing they cannot see their own
nm
amazing
it amazes me what we have become as a society. Deal? No thanks! How shameful. No wonder some children are like they are today with people in this world with this mind set. I do not "depend" on anyone to raise my children except for myself, my husband and God. Do you not think that a 17-year-old young man should be able to go to the library, for cryin out loud, by himself to research a paper and not have to worry about porn popping up? Do you really think that I, as a parent, should not feel safe in letting him do that? At the LIBRARY for crying out loud? Please, you deal.
Amazing, isn't it?
I am in between treatments (last in October - due to intolerance to chemo drug), my husband got laid off (after being told he wouldn't be) and Cobra is dicking us around, so no health care coverage at this point. The last thing I'm worried about is my "tax cuts." I don't even want to hear what my onc has to say. The simple-mindedness of some just astounds me. I haven't applied for ANY govt assistance but my doc's office did........now I'm just a lazy bum, right? Dragging my carcass around on the backs of all these hardworking MTs...........
Amazing how...
...Barney Frank, who helped orchestrate the whole Fannie/Freddie fiasco, and later denied there was any problem (saying the agencies were were doing a splendid job) is now denying any responsibility. Now he's saying the republicans caused it because it exploded on Bush's watch. And now Frank is screaming for government oversight of banks who made *risky loans* which dem-sponsored policies forced them to make. It is so machiavelian! You have to give them points for turning this whole thing to their advantage. Now under the guise of fixing Bush's mess, they can slip in the whole laundry list of social policy changes they've been panting after for decades. I am in awe.
Amazing!
I remember some talk before the elections that younger voters only get their "news" from Jon Stewart and "The Daily Show." I never agreed with that assessment because in order to "get" Stewart's sometimes subtle comedy, one had to know the real story in advance.
This is the first time I recall watching the "Daily Show" where I didn't laugh very much. It seems that this IS the one time that Stewart actually did report some pretty important news that no other "mainstream" media source was able to do.
To me, this was probably the most important news story to cover (or try to understand) what happened to the economy.
It's a shame that it took a comedy show to do it!
this is really amazing.....nm
nm
It's amazing.....
You can always see the idjits on here by seeing the people they think are unimportant... yes, believe it or not, these ladies are very intelligent and just because you don't have their level of intelligence is no reason to always put them down! Look at her status....
now, look at yours!!! ROFL!!!!!!!!
I don't see that at all gt. It's amazing sometimes the things you say.
 The whole first page of the C board is one long attack on MT. One long constant attack.
An Amazing Coincidence
(The link to the Hannity & Colmes interview referred to is http://www.911podcasts.com/files/video/FetzerHannityColmes200606222.wmv). I would definitely recommend watching this.
There are a lot of *coincidences* here, it would seem.
Regardless of your position on this topic, you cannot help but admit that a major coincidence (at the very least) took place on the morning of June 23, 2006.
It all began on the evening of June 22, 2006, when Hannity & Colmes (on the FOX/RNC Channel) had a guest on by the name of Dr. James H. Fetzer (see endnote). Fetzer is a member of 9/11 Scholars for Truth. Due to some unexpected initial confusion on the part of the hosts regarding their chosen attack theme (they got their facts FOXED, as Fetzer said), Fetzer was given a rare opportunity to answer an open-ended question -- almost without interruption. As the lawyers all say, Never ask a witness any question to which you do not already know the answer.
Colmes asked Fetzer something to the effect, So can you give us one piece of evidence that would tend to point toward 9/11 being an inside job by the Bush Administration?
While Ollie North (who was guest hosting for Hannity) was apparently still lost in confusion, Fetzer had a rare opportunity to speak a few full sentences without hostile, obnoxious interruptions. He said (and I'm paraphrasing here again), I point you to Secretary of Transportation Norman Minetta's testimony before the 9/11 Commission. Minetta said he had encountered Vice President Cheney in a bunker in Washington, DC, at 9:20 AM, on the day of the attacks [forty-three minutes earlier than Cheney said he had arrived]. Every few seconds a young man would come into the room and say, 'Sir, it's 50 miles out. Sir, it's 40 miles out. Sir, it's 30 miles out,' and so on. Finally the young man asked the Vice President, 'Sir, do the orders still stand?' Cheney replied gruffly, 'Of course, the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?'
Fetzer went on to explain that only later did Minetta learn that the young man was referring to Flight 77 approaching Washington, DC, and the orders the young man was referring to were obviously orders NOT to shoot the plane down. That's why the young man had finally asked if the orders still stood, to which Cheney replied that they did. Shortly thereafter, Flight 77 (or a reasonable facsimile thereof) struck the Pentagon.
Obviously, the producers of the Hannity & Colmes Propaganda Hour had not anticipated such a damning bit of irrefutable evidence to escape over their airwaves to their glassy-eyed, drool-chinned audience.
Here's the Real Kicker... The very next morning, less than twelve hours after his 9/11 testimony had been unexpectedly exposed to the FOX faithful, Norman Minetta resigned as Secretary of Transportation.
What an unbelievably amazing coincidence of timing!
Just for the sake of argument, let's say Minetta's timing was truly nothing more than a coincidence. If so, then he couldn't have picked a worse time to announce it (unless it was his relatively subtle way of sending a message to the masses). Or, if he was forced to resign by Bush/Cheney (for whatever reason), they couldn't have picked a more self-incriminating time to make it happen.
There has been barely a peep about Minetta's resignation in the mainstream media. I saw the same, generic, non-informational, totally uncurious five-second clip about it several times, but there has been absolutely no speculation as to why he did it (although his recent back surgery is implied to be the main reason). That's incredibly unusual behavior for our babbling heads, isn't it? Other high-level resignations in the last few months from the Bush Administration were the subject of endless babble among the MSM elite.
A Final Thought I can only imagine the sudden conflicting thoughts of at least five out of every one hundred Fox viewers who had heard Fetzer mention Minetta's damning testimony just a few hours before Minetta resigned. What must they have been thinking for a short time before their self-hypnosis kicked back in?
Click here to download the clip of the four-minute interview (in Windows Media Format). An AVI version is here.
[Note: James H. Fetzer (FM) Distinguished McKnight University Professor of Philosophy at the University of Minnesota, Duluth, a former Marine Corps officer, author or editor of more than 20 books, and co-chair of Scholars for 9/11 Truth.]
Source: http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=consp_911&Number=284742411#Post294752412
I can do both...I multitask. Amazing how you all...
toe the party line tho. Right or wrong.
Wow... what an amazing post! And I sure do
agree about gay men, too. They're some of my best girlfriends! They're funny, extremely bright, all extremely talented, and make my circle of friends eclectic and totally complete. I wouldn't trade those friends for all the heteros in the world. :)
Yes, it is amazing when you ask a question and actually...
let a person answer it without interruption you can learn what they really have to say. This is a very intelligent woman. The foreign policy I can see Russia from Alaska thing is ridiculous. Obama has been running for 18 months and has 300 foreign policy advisors and he still isn't up to speed, that's why Biden is around. If something happened to Biden if Obama won, he would have to surround himself with foreign policy people...just like Palin would if something happened to McCain. She is as ready as her is right now and she is second chair on the Republican ticket, not first chair. Sigh.
Obama - he is truly amazing
what a gift to our country at this tumultous time.
I think it amazing we could hear all
this over and over and over, but not another word (at least that I have heard) about the young man who hacked into her email.
Amazing, yes. Just to show that all you
argument going: *Who said anything about the US being the head of that one-world government?*
*It's unbelievable the conceit that Americans have. One world government? -- that would be based on speculation. What makes you think other countries would even agree to being under the same rule as the US when (especially since the reign of Bush) other countries look at us like we're idiots and war mongers?*
You are implying the US would be the head.
*Let's take Canada for example. They don't have the same problems as the US.*
Meaning Canada would not want the US to be the head.
*In my view they are a much more progressive country with not nearly the problems with special interest groups as the US.*
Your view, you don't think the US should be the head.
*Did you know that in order to become a Canadian citizen you have to first prove that you have a viable income? There are many other countries with successful governments. What makes you think they want a bunch of Americans messing that up?*
You say many other countries have successful governments, why would we think *they want a bunch of Americans messing that up?* Once you imply that America would be the head.
And your only comeback is I have no idea, I didn't say it would be the US? All you are doing here as in many of your other posts is trying to stir someone up just for the sake of arguing. You are not worth the time. You will figure this all out about the time you figure out *it ain't no ghost story and we don't need no crystal ball!*
Yes, your ignorance is amazing....
It is true - food stamps get spent and stimulate the economy more than anything else. When we have millions without jobs right now - don't you think they deserve to eat? Probably not. You probably still live with mommy and daddy.
Amazing how you don't care about who is REALLY
XX
your ignorance is amazing -and O will bankrupt the
nm
Amazing. Just glide right over the fact that...
Democratic congress got us here...oh, but that doesn't matter. We just ignore that. If it were Republicans hanging themselves in those videos, you would be calling for their heads. Absolutely amazing. Just amazing.
Amazing, as I was just thinking this verse to
xx
Truly amazing the lengths pubs go to
The voters are onto your scare tactics. The anger you seek to incite will come back on your party tenfold it you continue striving to take attention off of the economy. They are not interested in your dead-end Obama trashing. They want to know what your candidate will do to address this crisis. The answer should not include the name of his opponent. The question relates to his own plan. Why should voters believe John McCain would do anything different from W when it comes to the economy?
|
