I think one of the deciding factors....(sm)

Posted By: Just the big bad on 2009-02-05
In Reply to: Another thing. Most of those so-called - Backwards typist

is how each state spends the money, or if there are guidelines? I don't know how that's going to work yet. However, I don't think you'll get the shoe and candy companies back, but what you could get are green jobs. If this is done correctly, then those jobs will be long term as well as those industries that would supply materials for those jobs. Infrastructure is pretty immediate and is technically a short term thing in the grand scheme of things, but even then will last for years. I like the diversity of the stimulus package. It provides for jobs in many different industries. Diversity is a good thing. I think if you take the stimulus appart, look at each section and ask yourself "who gets a job out of this" you will find out what it really does.

Complete Discussion Below:

marks the location of current message within thread

Listening to the Senate debate this so-called - Backwards typist
- Oh, I know.....(sm) - Just the big bad
  - I don't think giving NASA more money - Backwards typist
    - We can't address the current....(sm) - Just the big bad
  - It provides GOVT jobs! -Who pays for that? - WE do, the taxpayer. awful plan.nm
    - Oh boy....(sm) - Just the big bad
      - Another thing. Most of those so-called - Backwards typist
        I think one of the deciding factors....(sm) - Just the big bad
        I've been taking the package apart. - Backwards typist
        What about...(sm) - Just the big bad
        Used to, 50 miles away. - Backwards typist
        I think one provision in there...(sm) - Just the big bad
      - Not in my state. The governor gives - Backwards typist
- Now you know how WE felt for - 8 Years
  - So you're in favor of this? - lk
    - That's what i had hoped, too, but - Backwards typist
    - It is a joke. But the dems here would rather blame - Bush even for Obama's terrible plan!.nm

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database

THis was not about deciding whether abortion was legal...
it was deciding to allow an infant who survived an abortion, was breathing and heart beating OUTSIDE the mother, to be left to DIE. ANYONE who would countenance THAT is, to me, subhuman and has no heart. He claims tocare about the poor and downtrodden and wants to deny care to a baby who survived an abortion? What a liar. Barack Obama cares about getting Barack Obama elected and that is ALL he cares about.

I don't understand your question, sorry....if I don't want him controlling my health care why would I want him deciding if an abortion should be legal? I don't want him controlling my health care, and the Supreme Court already decided (unconstitutionally I might add) that abortion is legal. THIS was about INFANTICIDE. Killing a living breathing infant outside and separate from the mother by denying it medical care. Abortion is horrific enough, but that is out and out negligent homicide, and he voted FOR it. That tells me all I need to know about Barack Obama and how he cares about people.

Who do you propose should be in charge of deciding
You are not in charge of punishing Dr. Ayers...it is a legal matter that evidently was resolved 4 decades ago. Since that time he has become a contributing member of society and it would be a waste of talent to shun him and brand him with a scarlet letter.

Oh I sorry, yeah, sure the people are the deciding factor
Yeah, right people really are the ones who decide who the president will be. Yeah, right, okay.

That's good that you are still deciding, but you didn't answer my question. nm
.