I figured it must be really funny
Posted By: Old Glory on 2008-10-04
In Reply to: My husband and I went to go see this - Zville MT
Farley & Grammer were on O'Reilly (Friday) talking about it & naturally Bill's cameo in it. It should be up on his w/s tomorrow. I'll look for it and post it. Otherwise, check it out.
It's about time we get some "fair & balanced" comedy for a change. That's why I never miss RedEye, either.
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
You done figured it all out
Already coming up with conspiracy theories about losing even before losing the 2006 elections. Talk about defeatism. No wonder you all can't win elections. You defeat yourself before you even lose. If I was a Democrat and/or liberal I'd just buy a gun and shoot myself, because the world you all live in is pretty bleak.
yup - that's what I figured
.
I figured seeing as
I figured I'd like many others. Close my eyes, spin around in circles, say there's no place like home, there's no place like home while listening to Farrakan profess about the messiah. I wanted to try to feel what it must feel like on the kool-aid without actually having to drink some. So turned on MSNBC to listen to them.
After being a grown up, it sure is hard to be a kid again.
You think they might have figured out hip-hop won't be enough?......nm
x
That's what I figured
Can't argue with the truth.
That's what I figured. In fact,
it truly was a rhetorical question. 
I figured he'd be right up your alley...
He'll argue a point to the death regardless if he is wrong.
Yeah, I figured it was that way...sm
Are they like that to Obama when they spoof him? Riduculing, I mean?
How were they to Hillary, nice or not
Just wondering, cuz I don't stay up to watch that kind of stuff anymore. I think every president I ever saw them make fun of, they were, well, making fun of them....usually in an slightly underhanded way. But hey, it's a spoof, I understood that. I especially remember Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan spoofs. Not kind at all.
Are they nice spoof to the dems?
Thanks if you answer....
Sounds like you got it all figured out . . .
tell me where you got your crystal ball, 'cause I want one!
yea, I figured this would shut a few of them
xx
Have you figured out why the GOP imploded yet?
on how to save themselves from themselves? You really do have more important things to do with your time that make yourself look like a fool.
That's what I figured. - no message
.
Haven't you figured out yet that
obviously according to JTBB that black people are allowed to be racist. It is the white fold who aren't allowed to make any sort of comment against any other religion or race or their career will be in the dumpster. Minorities are the only ones allowed to be racist vocally.
To me....Rev. Wright is nothing but a racist black man who is bitter with a huge chip on his shoulder. He says what he wants when he wants and obviously there is as reason why Obama was made to get away from him....even though he really didn't want to in the beginning.
Haven't you figured it out yet?
Some of these folks are so caught up in the Obama "blind" love affair, they can't focus on reality!!
I figured that'd bring out the first-graders:)
Nice to know I'm not yet over-estimating the self-flagellating opposition.
Ahhh...okay...I finally figured out who you really are....
and now this makes sense. You hide behind different monikers and pitch a fit and attack posters personally because you are incapable of handling disagreement. Frankly, I am not insisting anyone play with me. That, again, had nothing to do with any liberal poster other than you...and I likened you to a spoiled child, which is obvious from your actions...hardly name calling. My original post, after which you went off on me for no good reason, merely stated I was going to respect what two of the posters here were complaining about, that they did not want conservatives coming here and *making* them defend their positions because they were good people and knew they were right. I said I would respect that and just read, although I did not really understand why someone secure in their view would mind presenting it while also respecting the right of someone to disagree. Yes, that is definitely extending an olive branch. There is no need to fight and there is certainly no need to make it personal like fighting kids in a schoolyard. And, typically, under whatever moniker you use, you swoop in with the snide personal attacks. I guess you just can't help yourself.
I said I used to enjoy coming to this board because there were liberals who posted here who WERE secure in their beliefs and did not mind a lively debate at all. We did not always agree, but in some cases we did, and we respected each other's opinions. And you know that, because when you took time out from personally attacking me and every other conservative who came to this board, I am sure you read some of those posts. Yes, I know you are going to deny that I know you...but I know you. You stand out, believe me, because even if you change your moniker, your style of posting gives you away. It is always *us* and *we* like you are speaking for every liberal who comes to this board. You just gotta be you, I guess. Well, if it makes you feel better to attack me, have at it. Knock yourself out. Enjoy!
Spongebob and Patrick? I figured as much. nm
x
She's that young? I figured McCain was at
I figured you were talking economically, but it
sure wouldn't hurt any for us to get on our knees and ask for guidance from above. 
I figured your post was for me. I know I couldn't be the only one!
Thank you for standing with me!
I figured using an article that was not biased by. . .s/m
your so-called ""liberal spin"" might hold a little more credence. After all, the Canadians don't have a partisan agenda and are just reporting the facts.
I figured it out...because we didn't change his name...
With the collusion of the courts and some unknown official in Hawaii, this was all covered up, but it remains quite certain to this day that we DO NOT KNOW FOR SURE that Obama is even a natural-born citizen as requird for his office. If I absolutely HAD to bet everything on this question, I would bet he's not.
I figured out Silly Sally! See inside!
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Silly+Sally
Have any of you pubs figured out why your party imploded,
your leadership deficit, whether your party is going more right or more central or what kind of paltform transplant you will be seeking? Let me give you a hint. Relentless Obama stalking, witch hunts and outlandish fabrications and criticisms did work real well for you in 2008. I'm with Just the Big Bad....you might want to rethink this strategy.
Well, Freethinker, if you haven't figured it out, this board is really into labels.
Though they will protest they aren't. It's obvious from a look at this board why there are two boards.
Well....good for you....you figured out that this is a democratically-dominated board...
profound grasp of the obvious. lol.
I guess she figured a way around that super majority thing, huh....
with no checks and balances from the minority, they will, in essence, make themselves a super ruling body, i.e., dictatorship, under Obama.
Heaven help us all.
I didn't watch that part. I figured it would be ridiculous. What's the scoop?
x
already heard this - wasn't funny then, not funny now!
x
Excuses, excuses - just what I figured.
Funny how it's only congress that prevents the democrats from keeping their promises but when we have a republican president it's always blamed directly on the president.
These issues I mentioned in my original post had nothing to do with congress. These were the O's decisions. He could have voted to repeal the Patriot Act and kept his campaign promise, but he didn't. He could have read through the spending bill before he signed it and gotten rid of the earmarks and kept his campaign promise. But no, these were his decisions.
But since we now have a democratic congress who are you going to blame for that?
Wow! Talk about double standards
This is funny.nm
x
So are so funny
LOL, your posts get funnier and funnier..with more hate shining through, LOL.
This is so funny! Thank you.
I copied it and sent it to everyone I know, and they love it, too.
OMG! Too funny!!
Especially the guy who said he was in favor of national healthcare because he works 40 hours a week and his benefits are terrible. Yet he didn't know that Bush doesn't WANT him to have good medical benefits.
The last guy was right on the money (even if he didn't know Bush's name): Bush SHOULD be over there with a gun in his hand since he started this mess.
Someone should point out to these people who can't remember that his name IS what he is: BU_ _ SH _ _!
Vanna... I wanna buy a vowel.
That's funny. No, I am most
Too funny - here's 1 more
Donald Rumsfeld was meeting with George W for their daily brief regarding the war in Iraq. Rumsfeld said to George, And yesterday, 3 Brazilian soldiers were killed in Iraq. Bush is visibly distraught; hanging his head, wringing his hands. He finally looks up at Rumsfeld and says, My God, that's terrible. How many are in a Brazilian?
This is what is funny about this?
They have made up their minds they have got this thing won just like they did in 2004. They don't even entertain the possibility that they will lose. They are so egotistical to think they might even throw the elections to make the Republicans look like fools. This is along the same thought process that they think they won by losing California primaries and losing on Prop. 50.
I think they know they're in trouble, but have chosen to lay their strategy out like they've got things under control. The Democrat blogs are all up in arms about what is happening with the party. Let's just say the extreme left is very unhappy with them right now, and they think the extreme left is their bread and butter. They thought that in 2004 and look where it got them.
Wow, this really shows how screwed up they are, not you dem, but your party.
LOL - too funny.
Too funny. One of the best
http://seattle.nwsource.com/horsey/viewbydate.asp?id=1400 David Horsey from the Seattle Post-Intelligencer and Mike Keefe from The Denver Post consistenly nail it....too good.
It's almost funny to me
How heated this debate has gotten. When I looked at that site I posted, where it compares the current legislation and the proposed legislation, it doesn't look all that different, just more funding so that more children qualify.
Funny that. sm
Yours and one other are the only bad comments about her I have seen. it doesnt' appear to be working.
Too funny
Unfortunately too true.
I don't think it was funny....like I said, if he DID say it...
she should have slapped him silly right there in front of the cameras and everybody. But it IS rumor. It was told, supposedly, by 3 reporters from Arizona to this guy writing a book who has a bone to pick with McCain. As to not coming forward because of fear of retaliation...I don't buy them for a nanosecond. I am sure when this guy went looking for dirt some money crossed hands and a lot of embellishing went on...like any political smear book on any political candidate. When you can't deal with real issues that can be proven or disproven (Read "The Case Against Barack Obama" and you will know what I mean). There is none of the personal smear tactic where innuendo and "anonymous" quotes are used. Just plain simple historical fact that can be proven. THAT is the kind of information I pay attention to. Not the "anonymous" rumor stuff.
Obviously if it DID happen they wish it never happened. Obama wishes someone had not been taping when Wright went off on his rants. Obama wishes no one had checked on his fib about voting against saving babies who survive abortion. McCain wishes he hadn't done the things he did to cause his first marriage to fail. Everyone has regrets.
What about all the rumors and innuendo about Hillary Clinton bathmouthing the secret service people and calling them names every bit as hateful as what the rumor says JOhn McCain called his wife? I just chalked that up to rumor and innuendo because it could not be proven...just like I am doing about the McCain thing.
As to them denying it...why bring more attention to it...ever heard of "I think he doth protest too much?" I don't blame them. I would not dignify the accusation with a denial either.
DO YOU THINK THAT'S FUNNY?????
x
Funny...no.
Sad and pathetic......yes. How can they ban one speaker because of his affair and lies and yet let another man speak who did the exact same thing. The only difference is that Hilliary was not dying when Bill shoved a cigar up Monica's.....well....you get the idea.
Something funny about
the sandbox. Your subject line is a phrase I used a while back when I was on the run from the Bible thumpers. Their fearless leader will be hopelessly confused now that the libs are coming out in droves sporting all kinds of intimidating intelligence. Their heads snap around like Linda Blair in the Exorcist as they spin themselves into the ground and especially when the same phrases and concepts start showing up from all different directions. They really do not know what to do when they can't dominate the board and woop up on one lib at a time...seems to be their limit.
too funny
Yeah and McCain has a biracial love child..........just ask GW, his campaign told everybody the REAL truth. O is a closet muslim (just ask the mental giants on this board!). He eats baby brains for breakfast. He wants to teach kinder-kids the proper way to put on a condom. He's hiding, he's hiding, he's hiding..........but, he hasn't been able to drop a decent deuce since the onset of his campaign because the media is so far up his bum. Bad Obama. Bad, bad, bad. Spank him, spank him hard. Yeah, just like that. And the truth shall set you free.
Too funny!
I will throw softly here :-) I guess my point is, and again, I may be showing my ignorance on the subject. I am a Christian, coming from a very fundamental background, but have since strayed from so much of the legalism. I am beginning to see a lot of things from a different light, if you know what I mean. I was taught that same-sex relationships was a horrible, horrible sin. I no longer feel that way about the issue. I do have questions though. We as a human race are here because of heterosexual relationships are we not? Not from same-sex relationships. Would we be extinct if that was all there was, and if it were the norm? I have worked with gays and lesbians, I have been neighbors of gays and lesbians, as I mentioned two of my best friends are gays and lesbians. I do not have an issue --- REALLY! It is just some back of the mind questions that I have. I guess we all have questions and may never know the answers. I am not voting against gay marriages. Yes, your same-sex relationship is your business as my heterosexual relationship is mine - - but it seems as if no one is questioning mine - - Is this because it is right, and the norm??? What exactly are the issues here??.
that's okay - it was funny the first
time. I imagined myself as a human broach.
It is just too funny
to see it happen though. I know they are trying to distract with stupid things and it really shows this individuals ignorance. But, it is an amusing way to kill a few minutes while my new software downloads!
I think she is funny. . .
I get tired of the pompous know-it-all attitudes.
|
