I don't think tobacco will ever
Posted By: C. Mudgeon on 2009-06-11
In Reply to: Just wait! DH told me yesterday - Backwards typist
be outlawed. Better hope it's not. (Besides, the tobacco growers are too strong a lobbying group.) Revenues from tobacco are too big a part of the federal budget. If they lose that money they will have to jack up taxes in other areas to make up for it. The feds will simply keep raising the tax on it slowly and incrementally, never enough at one time to cause smokers to quit en mass. It's like boiling a frog. Put him in cool water, bring up the heat very slowly and he doesn't notice what's happening. Except this frog will not be boiled to death, that would cost the government too much money.
If Obama succeeds in getting us all into itty-bitty roller skates cars we will not be saving any money due to the reduced gas usage because the tax on a gallon of gas will have to be increased to compensate for the reduced consumption.
This is like chasing a bump in a carpet, get it smoothed out here, it pops up over there.
Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old. To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
Maybe the tobacco companies have
I suppose that is another reasonable explanation as to why he would veto a bill that only promised to raise the cigarette tax. Too bad so many of the politicians that are supposed to work for us work for big business. I'm so disapointed in our government today.
If O didn't want to quit smoking, tobacco wouldn't be an
nm
BTW, I detest tobacco but I detest govt control even
nm
|