I don't believe she is capable of
Posted By: anything else. on 2009-01-01
In Reply to: If you are not able to follow my thread, - sm
I must say her incessant vitriol has completely discredited any validity that her argument may have held.
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
See? You ARE still capable of "getting it"!
n/m
Wouldn't you rather have a capable person
Typical Publican.
Sticks and stones......and you are capable...
only of petty, small insults and attacking in packs. Certainly something to be proud of. You should add it to your resume.
The left is not capable of thinking that way. Instead,
nm
Are you at all capable of original thought?
used on the forum today at least a dozen times. It has just about as much meaning in this post as it did early this morning....zero. Why don't you confine yourself to speaking on behalf of your own flock, 'cause you sure hs hades don't know what you are talking about when you try to speak for the other 69,456,897 fellow citizens who voted Obama into office.
I dont consider that witch to be capable of
Obama is smart enough to be capable enough to do both. geez-oy. nm
xx
We already established she is capable. It is a bonus that she is a fine person.
Typical Dem.
How predictable that I read an entire thread and am capable of forming an independent conclusion?
that's quite predictable. You're obviously not one of those people.
You have to check and double check every single thing they say. They're not capable of telling t
truth about anything. It's getting very boring and tedious to read their crap. Why won't they stay on their own board like they tell us to do?
Oh yes, I believe Saddam is capable of any atrocity, chemical warfare, biological warfare, etc......
But it has been proven that the American people were misled and lied to, the workers who searched diligently for WMDs found none at all at the time we charged into Iraq and started this multi-trillion dollar nightmare. Are we going to rush into every nation on earth if we suspectthey have weapons we do not like? At that time, the WMD question in Iraq was a reuse to charge in and once again try secure the oil there for George's friends with ton's of interests in Middle East oil. I am not the one kidding myself, if you want to re-write history to try and defend George Bush, you will have one heck of a problem.
|
