I believe she has been posting under a variety of names. (nm)
Posted By: JMHO on 2008-10-14
In Reply to: Where is sam today? - sm
:p
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
She is here, just posting under different names. (nm)
:p
Then you are a liar posting under many names. Happy now? nm
of the gutter variety it seems. (nm)
nm
Other names.......
I posted a couple of times after sam, if those are the "other times" you think she was answering herself. She was not.....there are others who agree with her.
But, you have a point, no need to bring it up anymore, as it seems to be a waste of time on some.
NAMES
the shelley, chele, cheele, huh, and NM situation is causing a problem for me! what names ARE available????
names
maybe we should just start putting believer and atheist in the name slot!
Names?
Please post documentation to back this up. They were APPOINTEES? Well, we could have them hang ten and corrupt the entire country like Cheney and Rumsfeld did - they were a promising duo, now weren't they? You ever hear dubya apologize and admit a mistake? Hahahahahaha!
Exactly how many names are you going to use to post, gt? sm
Let's talk about ridculous, sweetie. 
I can think of more fitting names for something you
X
I think he is right....I just think he should have named names...
the entire congress is not responsible for where we find ourselves today. They never had the opportunity to vote on the bill that would have prevented this because Dodd and Frank killed it in committee. Other than that...I think he is right. They do need to be honest with us when they ask us to pony up that kind of money and at least demonstrate how it will fix it and what they are going to do to avoid it in the future. Good for Senator DeMint.
fed reserve names
http://newsfromthewest.blogspot.com:80/2008/05/who-owns-federal-reserve.html
Hasn't really changed much.
nite nite
Oh please....then give me a few other names of his...sm
other friends, you know, the ones not on this list?
Hmmmmm....methinks there's gonna be some of that deafening silence one poster keeps ranting about....
Obama has no other ties that he wishes to share....so he's a blank slate...
Don't think so......
His slate was filled with all those other people, and now that he wipes it clean and claims no association.....
The slate is blank, just like the empty suit.
If I'm wrong, please show me and name his friends for the last 20, 30 years?
Thanks in advance.
I just think the names are unnecessary. nm
x
I'd like some names of politicans
that gave lots to charities. I find all politicians to be greedy.
I never call names....
I am a refined democrat.
calling names
 Vie:
I don't know which side of the bed or as I tend to think you crawled out UNDER, but to call people names on top of your irrational delusional rants about who said what here - you are truly asking to bet your feelings hurt here. As far as your comment about 'what are you going to say when you stand in front of God' to "M/SM"; I am sure they will say that they are glad they are NOT YOU. Don't go away mad - just go away..
Sorry, but I saw no shocking names.
Who shocked you by making the list?
Interesting...once again who are the names?
Seems Obama always has questionable people behind him..... funny they NEVER have names! Wonder why that is...............most of us already know that answer!
http://obamalies.net/obama-lies-directory
In this I disgree! There is only one God, he has many names, but it is the same God
I also disagree that only Christians will go through 'the pearly gates.'
Who knows what religion is the right one?
Either they are all wrong or they are all right.
There is only one God.
Does it really matter what her children's names are
or why she and her husband chose their particular names. Both of my children (now grown) have names that could be considered old-fashioned. but my husband and I chose simply them simply because we like the names. What she named her children really has no relevance in the upcoming election. More important is her stand on the issues that affect us as a country. 
yeah, those are some of the names and facts ...sm
and figures my hubby told me, that flew right out my other ear......glad you remembered them for me.....lol...he can roll that stuff right off the top of his head, and I'm like, eyes glaze over...uh huh.......
Then I was right....the same two dems change names...sm
daily, sometimes posting under two, three, four or five names a day!
LOLOLOL..........
There's way more dems on this board than reps, unless what I just posted is true!!!!!!!
Actually.....a whole mess of independents, too.....myself included.....most inde's shy away from socialism though.....can't call 'em republicans.....
Instead of crashing our board and calling us names,
why don't you honor the moderator's request and stay on your own board? You add nothing of value here and only serve to make this a less desirable place to visit.
Told ya if wait long enough.... see above NAMES. LOL.
xx
Fraudulent voting IS but they only registered names like
Obviously they cannot vote with those names. Also, the FBI is investigating so you dummy don't have to worry.
You're stuck on names instead of facts
@
Check the sources/web site names..
Whenever you receive one of the forwarded political emails, or watch something political on You Tube, look in the address bar and see what web site or original email address it comes from. One of the greatest things about the internet is that anyone can create a web site or send emails. And one of the worst things about the internet is that anyone can create a web site or foward emails. You have to learn to research the source and take into consideration the bias and intention of the originator.
Same Poster--Multiple Screen Names
What other names are you using besides MT in PA, SAM? It doesn't take a detective to figure out that MT in PA is Sam. Who do you think you're fooling?
And where did she dig up those names? Twig, Trig, Trick, Track,
Terrible thing to do to a kid.
I guess we are allowed to call names so YOU ARE a FOOL nm
NM
Typical, retreat without answering a simple question under ANY of your many names...
demean, belittle, name-call, deride, post under different names to support your view because no one else will...and as far as granting my wish...never asked you leave...you said you were leaving to hunt a job. I said see ya when you get back. That is hardly asking you to ride off into the sunset. You are so similar to Mr. Obama...birds of a feather and all that...ask a simple straight-forward question and you dodge it like it was on fire. Guess your superior intelligence just deserts you in the face of a simple question...or perhaps even you, from your lofty perch, have enough common sense to realize that there is no bigotry to what I said. You are far more bigoted toward conservatives and people you feel are inferior to you than I ever could be...and certainly more bigoted than my stance on immigration.
Still with the plaigiarism thing...good grief, you DO love to belabor a point, especially when you are wrong. Someone has always said something before...and in all your diatribes I did not find one original point. Read the same thing on leftist blogs, in articles, and on and on and on. Not one original thought from the great brain that is GT/GW/BW/FPJ.
See ya...and yeah, it HAS been fun. lol.
And no, I did not discount that FPJ could have been speaking on her own...just said if she was, she was plagiarizing you. You seemed to be so concerned about plagiarizing...not even taking into consideration that your lectures are about 98% plagiarized (by your definition...your words, not mine). Did you really think people wouldn't google?
Take care. I am still considering spiteful little vixen stationery...might even get T-shirts. :-)
Those are ethnic Alaskan names, part of her heritage and where she was raised...
do you REALLY want to get into a discussion about ethnic names when your candidate is named Barack Hussein Obama?
Can we please dump this ridiculous issue? He was named because his parents were proud of their heritage. So are Sarah Palin's children.
Good grief!! Unbelievable!!
Police putting names of activists on terrorist lists. sm
Dissent is patriotic. I wonder how many people are on these lists. It's creepy.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/07/AR2008100703245_pf.html
Obamatron -- adding that to the list of names I've been called here...LOL (sm)
*...at what point exactly will Obamatrons be willing to admit their chosen one might have a flaw or two?*
I'm going with after he is actually in office and is able to implement legislation as opposed to a guessing game on what he might or might not do.
why are you posting here?
I believe in personal responsibility. I dont believe you or the govt have a right to tell anyone what to do with their body. If my choices are wrong, I will stand in judgment when I meet my maker. I also dont follow in lock step with an administration that lies to the people about Iraq. Supporting our troops and not falling for lies about this illegal war are two different things. Yes, it is an illegal war. The world realizes this. The International Court of Justice realizes this. Of course, I support our troops and want them home. Believing in God is a personal decision and should not be shoved down others throats. I believe in separation of church and state, do not mix religion and politics. I dont believe we should have the state and/or president intervening when a spouse wants to let someone pass whose brain is half the size of a normal brain, living only due to rudimentary reflexes and I certainly do not think they should waste my tax dollars on trying to tie the hands of the spouse. These republicans/conservatives are way out of control in so many ways. It would be quite laughable if it wasnt so pitiful. I believe this is not a Christian country but a country with many religions and beliefs and I respect the people enough to let them choose what to believe. Seems to me nowadays democrats are acting like the way republicans used to, i.e., keep govt at a minimum and out of personal business, keep the budget balanced or as close to balance as possible. Republicans/conservatives are so off course right now. They are trying to invade into the states rights and personal rights. They have waged an immoral illegal war, my children and my childrens children will be paying to reduce this massive deficit, caused by republicans. Yes I oppose **liberating** other countries who dont ask us to help. Who the heck do we think we are, invading a soverign country and pushing our beliefs and religion and morals down their throats? Iraq is worse off today than it was under Saddam. Under Saddam, they had jobs, food, electricity, a life of certainty and definitely not lawlessness in the streets. We have killed tens of thousands of Iraqis with the excuse of liberating them. We have created a terrorist breeding ground and it will continue. The minute we kill off terrorists, their sons and daughters will rise up and fight back. We are just as bad as Saddam with our sickening war machine.
Thanks for posting this.
that's what it's all about.
posting
In an odd sense of.....oh...whatever, please continue to post here. No one wants you not to (gosh, it must be the green tea Im drinking this morning). *note to me, get rid of that darn republican green tea*..
Not posting here
What is it about this issue that makes you people think that anyone finds YOU to be a threat to the point where you are all suddenly retreating and saying you won't post here any more???????????
The problem is with the breach of security on this site. Unless you're the owner/moderator/administrator, this does not apply to you personally.
This issue should have been brought to the forefront on the company board a week ago when this incident happened, but I guess too many people were shocked by the blatant lack of ethics and the not so subliminal message that if anyone says anything negative about this company, your ISP will be tracked, and at that point, I, along with probable others, was afraid to post anything further.
why do they keep posting here?
For the life of me, I dont understand why these same bitter so angry conservatives come over to the liberal board and post. They are not wanted here. I guess the anger just builds up as they try to live their obviously unhappy lives and when they cant stand it any more, they come over here to start trouble. It just bugs the heck out of them that we are patriotic, love the troops and want them home alive. Some of these radical neocons actually say the troops are fighting for our freedom and freedom of speech? What? The war in Iraq has nothing to do with our freedom or freedom of speech. They will just throw anything out there to try to justify Bush's war. They sound so silly, just makes me shake my head and laugh. A bunch of fools.
Wow, thanks for posting
>
Thanks for posting.
I really like Paul Krugman.
Thank you for posting this.
And thanks Lurker for writing it. Lurker brought up many, many valid issues and good points. I wonder why nobody on that other board even bothered to address those issues.
There was someone posting here sm
In fact several, and I thought one of them was you, who were listing lots of links that Bush engineered 9/11. I guess I was mistaken, but someone was posting it here.
Thank you for posting this!
My heart was really heavy...was I was not aware of this stance until this thread began. It is indeed heartening to know this. Thanks again!
Thanks for posting
I think you made my point better than I did when I was discussing this. I don't think it was always clear exactly how the program worked. From what I had read, the basics of the program were staying essentially the same - that the states had the control over who they covered. The only things, at least from what I saw, that the expansion did was allow the federal government to raise their limit (which states do not have to necessarily comply with, it just gives the states more options), collect more income for the states' programs, and allow more agencies to help decide eligibility. Everything would still essentially be in the states' hands.
Thanks for posting that
That's the sort of stuff I was looking for. The article I read was obviously skewed the other direction. In a way, I think it makes me like him more. There are so many people in this country who are completely turned off by politics. They see it as a bunch of rich white men controlling their lives. Because he is so candid about his past, I think there will be a large number of people who feel that they can relate to him better than any other candidate.
It sounds a little crazy to say, but I think his honesty will help him.
Thanks for posting!
nm
Hey sam....thanks so much for posting....sm
I knew you could explain it much more succinctly than I could.
Thank you for posting that. sm
Loved it!
Thanks for posting! nm
nm
Thanks for posting
I'm not meaning to start a riot either but my opinion, this nation was founded on the principal that "In God we Trust." We are no longer a Christian nation. God blessed this nation for 200+ years, then we allowed Him to be kicked out and look where we are today. Again, this is MY opinion.
|
