Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

I'm sure you defended

Posted By: Pres. Clinton...sm-- Starcat on 2005-10-29
In Reply to: You really devalue yourself.... - SM

with this kind of vigor and this *innocent until proven guilty* line, right? Particularly because with Clinton it was over sexual escapades in which no one's life was actually placed in jeopardy as a result? I can assure you that GT is not alone in her *glee* that the chickens are finally coming home to roost and the veil of hypocrisy of the party of *moral values* is gradually being torn down...or did you really fall for that line about *restoring dignity to the White House*? Even the mafia has a higher ethical standard than these crooks do; at least they don't attack women and children.


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

what needs to be defended? nm
x
I have never once defended Ann Coulter.
But in your rage and blind hatred, you failed to see that.  In fact, I have stated more than once that I don't care for her.  But don't let me confuse you with facts.  You are obviously in full blown rage and far be it from me to stop you. 
I have not defended anybody, but since nobody knows the facts,including you,
s
Funny, you never defended her accusations against me
When she accused me of having multiple personalities/monikers on this board.  IMHO freedom of speech includes not having to speak to those you don't wish to.  Obviously I am not the only one who feels this way.
Dont you bet potato would have defended JOE if he
nm
I have no doubt at all that Republicans would have defended the sitting President.
You are way out of touch with the Democrats, but I guess that's because you are a leftist.  That does not surprise me.