I'm disappointed in you, as well, Lila.

I tried to have an exchange of ideas with you some time ago.  I had hoped that maybe you were someone who was sincere, reasonable and truly were here to debate.  You indicated you would answer my post *more in depth later.*  That was on May 13 -- a month ago tomorrow.  You have yet to respond, outlining your own views as I had outlined mine in an attempt to have an honest debate.

Instead you have elected to hijack threads to bring conflict to this board.  You pretend to be *respectful* when in fact you are not.  This post was clearly addressed to Liberals, but why should you have to respect that?  You should control everything, shouldn't you?  All the boards on the internet.  Which religion I should believe in.  Who I am allowed to love.  When I'm allowed to die.  Every single thing in my life (and in all Americans' lives) that is simply none of your business should be controlled by YOU and those who share your beliefs.

You have numerous posts repeatedly beating up Democrat because she posted a post with a *bad word* in it, yet the *bad spirit* of the words written by Ann Coulter is far worse than any one curse word. 

And your very own President described the Constitution as a piece of paper, using God's name in vain.  What kind of honest devout Christian President would refer to the Constituation (which he swore to uphold and protect) as *only a G**D***** piece of paper*? 

I admit to being nowhere near as perfect as you are, Lila, but sometimes I get angry and a curse word will escape my lips.  But regardless of how angry I get, I can't ever bring myself to *damn God* in my speech.  It's just something I've never done.

And since I'm not near the perfect Christian that you are, Lila, I won't be going to heaven, as those of certain Christian beliefs keep telling me.  These superhumans hold the *key* to heaven, and if don't believe EXACTLY as they demand I must, then I am doomed to eternal hell and damnation.

The original article posted by Lurker, that has been littered by your posts and those of your gang, is about Ann Coulter's self-professed *superiority* to ALL LIBERALS.  She refers to liberalism as a religion, and by doing so, she is belittling every single religous liberal in America.  It's about her uncontrollable hatred and mean spiritedness, and I must say that you and your friends on this board do an excellent job of mimicking her.  They do say that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.  Ann would be very pleased. 

You're a fraud, Lila.  I had hoped you would be different, had hoped you were a genuine and honest person.  But instead, you're just another Ann Coulter when it comes to the motive behind your presence here.  You're only here to create discomfort for others.  You have nothing positive to offer.  The only difference between you and Ann is that SHE'S the one with the book and book tour, TV appearances and is making millions of dollars off the pain of people.  But if there IS one thing I have faith in, Lila, it's that you're made of the *same stuff* as Ann Coulter, and that should certainly take you somewhere in life.

You pretended to be someone who, a month ago, claimed to want to answer my post *in more depth.*  Why did you lie about doing that, Lila?  And why did you instead choose to just be like all the other snipers who insist in inserting themselves on this board?  You're choosing hollow, meaningless, childish swipes over thoughtful reasoned communication.  I'm very disappointed in you, Lila.  I had hoped your heart was pure and your character authentic.

As far as *bad language* is concerned, I think I'd rather be told the truth by someone who curses like a sailor than to be lied to repeatedly by someone hiding behind a Bible.  The *badness* is in the spirit and the deed, Lila, not in the words.  And to repeatedly attack Democrat for making a human error regarding a word, after she apologized repeatedly to you, isn't a good thing, Lila.  There's no substance or intelligence there.  Just plain old nastiness.

But you and Ann already knew that, didn't you?

• For liberals only. - Lurker
  • Holy trainwreck Batman... - Lurker
    • Ward Churchill. - Lila
      • I would like to know from - Lurker
        • I read all the stories here. sm - sm
          • I did not say anyone was lying... - Lurker
            • Dang! then I could have gotten a free education - >>>>
              • Yes, you could have. If - Lurker
      • Most OPs know he is a fraud. SM - Pilamaya
        • I have read this... - Lurker
          • I only posted one story. sm - Pilamaya
            • He has just never been that important to me.. nm - Lurker
              • but yet you all are obsessed with Ann Coulter? - >>>>
                • Typical conservative response......sm - Democrat
                  • Thank you Democrat.. - Lurker
  • Thanks Lurker...very good read..Add this too...sm - Democrat
    • With or without the *word* - PK
  • Thanks, Lurker. - PK
  • I find it far more hypocritical that Islam preaches as the religion of peace. sm - sm
  • So by posting this, you assume that all liberals feel this way about Christianity? - Lila
    • Nobody stereotypes like liberals - ...
      • Aren't you stereotyping when you make that claim? - look in the mirror...nm
        • Yeah probably, but it's only okay when you do it? - ....
          • Probably not okay for any of us to do it. - Common sense here.
  • Great article, Lurker; thanks. - no msg. - Starcat

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

You are insulting at times (and then deny it) and you are quite a pest.  Nuff said.

a day without being talked down to is like....a good day.

I was hoping to see a reply like....oh..for the love of Pete or Michael...whichever brother struck your fancy.  Instead we just get a red angry face. 

We may not agree on political issues, but I'm still sending ya some love. 

Cheers, my friend.