I'd love to continue to argue with you

• let it die - vinnie
  • Dangerous............ sm - m
  • I don't agree - gourdpainter
    • but GP - vinnie
      • The problem is s/m - gourdpainter
        • One way to make the topic go away - GhostMom
        • "Regular readers have read and hopefully examined all offered verification for themselves.." - m
          • Please be advised - gourdpainter
            • Whatever, GP, ...... sm - m
              • Again whatever - gourdpainter
                • But they are "credible" as you stated above. sm - m
                  • I'd love to continue to argue with you - gourdpainter
                    • Starting at the community level......... sm - m
  • I am questioning that 75% - dnh
    • Make that 6.8%. - nm
      • Certainly not a "landslide" - see message
        • Who do you think you are kidding? - This stupidity has been "out there"....sm
          • So, if he is outright lying about the BC, that is okay - ? What else could he be covering up?nm
            • The bottom line is that he's not lying about it. It's just - your desperate wishful thinking. nm
          • you do know the electoral vote has not occurred?? - dnh
            • Has anyone ever in history won by this - sm
              • You need to brush up on your civics/history.......... sm - m
                • You are the one woh needs a brush up. - sm
                  • Margin or no......... sm - m
                    • There is nothing up in the air - sm
      • still a far cry from 75%....nm - dnh
        • 75% accounts for the former McC supports - sm
    • There are also those more level-headed Obama opponents - who genuinely embraced....sm
      • The "level-headed" people here voted for McCain. - .nm
        • Many still not embracing Obama because he - seems to be hiding something.nm
      • Let's have some "credible" source...... sm - m
        • What are you trying to say here? - You seroiusly think that....sm
          • No............. sm - m
            • Not changing the subject. - Just asking the same of you. sm
            • Well, let's see s/m - gourdpainter
              • Most folks will say that.......... sm - m

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

the bit about the open microphone on McCain during the debate was brilliant!!! I laughed until I literally cried!!  By the way, Michelle Obama was warm, intelligent, sincere and very much First Lady material!!!

This must be why you so obviously love Muslims? 

You do realize that you contradict yourself on just about every other post you make?  ROFL..

until the cows come homes, but how can you explain the fact that the tax cuts have produced HIGHER TAX REVENUES THAN AT ANY TIME DURING THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION, EVEN WITH HIS TAX HIKES?

Yes, the rich get the bulk of tax cuts, that's because THEY pay most of the taxes.  They also pay them at a higher rate.  And lest we forget the millions who dropped OFF the tax rolls after the Bush tax cuts. 

The next to the last paragraph was the most telling.  I wonder if this prediction will come true before the end of 2006 (after the elections, of course).

Dr. Charles finally goes to bed after this, his first bit of Google-cut-and-paste-environmental-journalism, fully expecting but hoping not to wake up in a world in which gas costs $10/gallon and we're at war with Iran.

the True Believers of JM/SP.  There is no fact or situation that would deter them from their dogged quest to drag the country to even lower depths.

According to the article linked below and others I have read, the two of the three auto makers who will be receiving these emergency loans will be required to either show a viable plan for their industries by March 31, 2009,  or face repayment of the loans.  While I agree with the premise of this requirement, I have to wonder if, given the amount of time that it took them to get into this situation in the first place, will 3 months, more or less, be enough time for them to find a way to save their dying companies?  Is this bailout/loan just a temporary fix to a more permanent problem?  What happens, if on 03/31/2009, the automakers have spent the money fronted them, are unable to come up with a plan to satisfy the stipulations, and can not repay the loan?  Is it fair for taxpayers to bear the burden of this as well as the other bailouts that have been given and are likely yet to come? 

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/11/business/11auto.html?ref=us

I know from the outset it will make no difference.  Life is too short and my time is too valuable. 

I won't be voting early, but I will be voting.  That's one for me and one for you.  No need to argue.  The votes will all be counted and we will see what happens.  

all I know (so far) is half the cost to help homeowners and create jobs like the dems package... In fact, I believe it almost had the same things EXCEPT the crappy projects that do nothing to create a healthy economy and put people back to work, keep them in their home, allow permanent tax cuts to you and me, not just businesses, but you and me. He wanted 5% off the top for us.

We have the highest business tax in the world and that is one of the reasons  companies moved their businesses out of here. McCain did want to cut the business tax when he was running, but people didn't see how that would help. It would have kept more businesses from moving out and hopefully, get some businesses to come back. Opps, sorry. That last statement about the businesses moving back is wrong. They use slave labor to get their products out and wouldn't want to come back and pay Americans a decent wage to produce their products because they want to keep the profits for themselves.

You have your opinion and I have mine. I think McC's package would have been better.

I still don't want to spend $88 million to move the one branch of government into another building. I still don't want to spend millions on youth summer jobs (up to the age of 24 BTW). I dont' want to spend millions on renovating the government buildings.  Even though the dems are thinking more on the lines of energy efficiency for these buildings (which is a good idea), THESE ITEMS DO NOT BELONG IN A STIMULUS PACKAGE TO HELP US OR THE ECONOMY. They only help certain areas of the country, not the whole country.

post articles I think would be interesting to people on this board. I try not to tear down the people who post, either, not like some on this board. They have their opinion, I have mine.  

Your idea of a reply very often isn't up for discussion. You seem to think it's the only one that matters. End of discussion.