Exactly how many names are you going to use to post, gt? sm
Posted By: sm on 2005-10-02
In Reply to: Someone is looking ridiculous and it isnt me - gt
Let's talk about ridculous, sweetie. 
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
Other names.......
I posted a couple of times after sam, if those are the "other times" you think she was answering herself. She was not.....there are others who agree with her.
But, you have a point, no need to bring it up anymore, as it seems to be a waste of time on some.
NAMES
the shelley, chele, cheele, huh, and NM situation is causing a problem for me! what names ARE available????
names
maybe we should just start putting believer and atheist in the name slot!
Names?
Please post documentation to back this up. They were APPOINTEES? Well, we could have them hang ten and corrupt the entire country like Cheney and Rumsfeld did - they were a promising duo, now weren't they? You ever hear dubya apologize and admit a mistake? Hahahahahaha!
I can think of more fitting names for something you
X
I think he is right....I just think he should have named names...
the entire congress is not responsible for where we find ourselves today. They never had the opportunity to vote on the bill that would have prevented this because Dodd and Frank killed it in committee. Other than that...I think he is right. They do need to be honest with us when they ask us to pony up that kind of money and at least demonstrate how it will fix it and what they are going to do to avoid it in the future. Good for Senator DeMint.
fed reserve names
http://newsfromthewest.blogspot.com:80/2008/05/who-owns-federal-reserve.html
Hasn't really changed much.
nite nite
She is here, just posting under different names. (nm)
:p
Oh please....then give me a few other names of his...sm
other friends, you know, the ones not on this list?
Hmmmmm....methinks there's gonna be some of that deafening silence one poster keeps ranting about....
Obama has no other ties that he wishes to share....so he's a blank slate...
Don't think so......
His slate was filled with all those other people, and now that he wipes it clean and claims no association.....
The slate is blank, just like the empty suit.
If I'm wrong, please show me and name his friends for the last 20, 30 years?
Thanks in advance.
I just think the names are unnecessary. nm
x
I'd like some names of politicans
that gave lots to charities. I find all politicians to be greedy.
I never call names....
I am a refined democrat.
calling names
 Vie:
I don't know which side of the bed or as I tend to think you crawled out UNDER, but to call people names on top of your irrational delusional rants about who said what here - you are truly asking to bet your feelings hurt here. As far as your comment about 'what are you going to say when you stand in front of God' to "M/SM"; I am sure they will say that they are glad they are NOT YOU. Don't go away mad - just go away..
Sorry, but I saw no shocking names.
Who shocked you by making the list?
Interesting...once again who are the names?
Seems Obama always has questionable people behind him..... funny they NEVER have names! Wonder why that is...............most of us already know that answer!
http://obamalies.net/obama-lies-directory
In this I disgree! There is only one God, he has many names, but it is the same God
I also disagree that only Christians will go through 'the pearly gates.'
Who knows what religion is the right one?
Either they are all wrong or they are all right.
There is only one God.
Does it really matter what her children's names are
or why she and her husband chose their particular names. Both of my children (now grown) have names that could be considered old-fashioned. but my husband and I chose simply them simply because we like the names. What she named her children really has no relevance in the upcoming election. More important is her stand on the issues that affect us as a country. 
yeah, those are some of the names and facts ...sm
and figures my hubby told me, that flew right out my other ear......glad you remembered them for me.....lol...he can roll that stuff right off the top of his head, and I'm like, eyes glaze over...uh huh.......
Then I was right....the same two dems change names...sm
daily, sometimes posting under two, three, four or five names a day!
LOLOLOL..........
There's way more dems on this board than reps, unless what I just posted is true!!!!!!!
Actually.....a whole mess of independents, too.....myself included.....most inde's shy away from socialism though.....can't call 'em republicans.....
I believe she has been posting under a variety of names. (nm)
:p
Then you are a liar posting under many names. Happy now? nm
Instead of crashing our board and calling us names,
why don't you honor the moderator's request and stay on your own board? You add nothing of value here and only serve to make this a less desirable place to visit.
Told ya if wait long enough.... see above NAMES. LOL.
xx
Fraudulent voting IS but they only registered names like
Obviously they cannot vote with those names. Also, the FBI is investigating so you dummy don't have to worry.
You're stuck on names instead of facts
@
Check the sources/web site names..
Whenever you receive one of the forwarded political emails, or watch something political on You Tube, look in the address bar and see what web site or original email address it comes from. One of the greatest things about the internet is that anyone can create a web site or send emails. And one of the worst things about the internet is that anyone can create a web site or foward emails. You have to learn to research the source and take into consideration the bias and intention of the originator.
Same Poster--Multiple Screen Names
What other names are you using besides MT in PA, SAM? It doesn't take a detective to figure out that MT in PA is Sam. Who do you think you're fooling?
And where did she dig up those names? Twig, Trig, Trick, Track,
Terrible thing to do to a kid.
I guess we are allowed to call names so YOU ARE a FOOL nm
NM
Typical, retreat without answering a simple question under ANY of your many names...
demean, belittle, name-call, deride, post under different names to support your view because no one else will...and as far as granting my wish...never asked you leave...you said you were leaving to hunt a job. I said see ya when you get back. That is hardly asking you to ride off into the sunset. You are so similar to Mr. Obama...birds of a feather and all that...ask a simple straight-forward question and you dodge it like it was on fire. Guess your superior intelligence just deserts you in the face of a simple question...or perhaps even you, from your lofty perch, have enough common sense to realize that there is no bigotry to what I said. You are far more bigoted toward conservatives and people you feel are inferior to you than I ever could be...and certainly more bigoted than my stance on immigration.
Still with the plaigiarism thing...good grief, you DO love to belabor a point, especially when you are wrong. Someone has always said something before...and in all your diatribes I did not find one original point. Read the same thing on leftist blogs, in articles, and on and on and on. Not one original thought from the great brain that is GT/GW/BW/FPJ.
See ya...and yeah, it HAS been fun. lol.
And no, I did not discount that FPJ could have been speaking on her own...just said if she was, she was plagiarizing you. You seemed to be so concerned about plagiarizing...not even taking into consideration that your lectures are about 98% plagiarized (by your definition...your words, not mine). Did you really think people wouldn't google?
Take care. I am still considering spiteful little vixen stationery...might even get T-shirts. :-)
Those are ethnic Alaskan names, part of her heritage and where she was raised...
do you REALLY want to get into a discussion about ethnic names when your candidate is named Barack Hussein Obama?
Can we please dump this ridiculous issue? He was named because his parents were proud of their heritage. So are Sarah Palin's children.
Good grief!! Unbelievable!!
Police putting names of activists on terrorist lists. sm
Dissent is patriotic. I wonder how many people are on these lists. It's creepy.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/07/AR2008100703245_pf.html
Obamatron -- adding that to the list of names I've been called here...LOL (sm)
*...at what point exactly will Obamatrons be willing to admit their chosen one might have a flaw or two?*
I'm going with after he is actually in office and is able to implement legislation as opposed to a guessing game on what he might or might not do.
P.S. Please scroll down after reading above post. Washington Post article included.
Reprinted in Boston Globe. Sorry!
I wrote: I second JTBB's post, 'watcher's post is misinformed crap...sm
pYou have also to read what's posted 'inside' the message.
Oops, meant to post this under the loose trolls post...
I'm going to keep ignoring these troll posts. It's kind of fun, actually, just pretend you don't see them.
Post the direct link. I don't see the post you're referring to.
t
The post I quoted was the entire post. It was not taken out of context. sm
I imagine there are as many emotions and thoughts going on with our troops as possible and each does not feel the same as the other, which is obvious by the posts here.
Sorry gourdpainter, my other post should have been under the wacky Pakistan post (nm)
xx
Why did you post this? Republicans have been asked NOT to post here..Bye Bye.
Why did you post this? Happy Thanksgiving is enough but to be so happy we have a republican president? Why did you post that? I would like to remind you, you are on the liberal board. Are you trying to start trouble? If so, let me know and I will report you immediately. No, Im not happy we have a republican president, a warmonger chickenhawk president. Does that answer your question? Now, go back to the republican board. We dont want you here and actually the moderator and administrator have asked republicans not to post here..Bye..bye..
Forgot to post a link in 1st post. Sorry.
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/money/tax/article1996735.ece
Please refer me to any post where I referred to either the post...
or the poster as ignorant. And I certainly never sunk to the levels you did at the top of the post, against a man who is ill in a wheelchair. Pot calling the kettle black...?
I re-read your post, and I stand by my post.
You are twisting his words by saying that he wants to make friends with terrorists. That is not what he said.
Ya gotta understand the rules. We have to post on this board only. They can post on any board they
The above post explains a lot about everything else you post!
Your revelation about being married to a career Army guy explains why your views are skewed so drastically to the far right! I thought it had to do with small-town Pennsylvania, but now I truly understand where you are coming from. Thank you for explaining that us. We will read your posts in a completely different light now that we know the truth.
If you want to post something on the subject, post
objective views. This is a one-sided publication that asks for donations to keep it going. Nothing I read in there posts anything against any democrats, just republicans. It is not a fair-minded reporting.
I like to read both sides of the aisle but this publication spews hatred for anything not democratic in order to sell books. To those who can't see both sides, this blog, or publication as they like to state, is just up their aisle. I shake my head at one-sided news. Taken from their web site:
"Indeed, a founding idea of the Consortium for Independent Journalism was that a major investment was needed in journalistic endeavors committed to honestly informing the American people about important events, no matter what the political and economic pressures.
While we are proud of the journalistic contribution that this Web site has made over the past decade – and while we are deeply grateful to our readers whose contributions have kept us afloat – we also must admit that we have not made the case well enough that this mission is a vital one.
Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His new book, Secrecy & Privilege: Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq, can be ordered at secrecyandprivilege.com. It's also available at Amazon.com, as is his 1999 book, Lost History: Contras, Cocaine, the Press & 'Project Truth.' "
I second your post and 'watcher's post
is misinformed crap.
My post was a direct answer to the direct post...
of Democrat. It was not a blank open-ended statement. And dial it back a notch...it is certainly your right to protest anything any time you want to. Just like it is my right to protest you protesting while men and women are still in harm's way, because you are in effect aiding the enemy. Apparently the Viet Nam experience taught you nothing. Americans protesting in the streets heartened the enemy and when they were about to surrender decided not to, based a lot upon what was happening in the American streets. I believe that the protesting in that war prolonged the war and cost more American lives. Hanoi Jane should have been tried for treason. That being said...lessons were not learned and the protestors are doing the exact same thing now. Exercising the very right bought for them by shedding of American military blood. And I still say common courtesy should keep people out of the streets and off the TV until the military are home safe. But it just proves the same thing to me over and over...the selfISHhness of the protestors vs. the selfLESSness of the military. They continue to put it all on the line for your right to protest anything you want to protest...it is up to YOU to decide where and when that is appropriate, and it is up to you to take the heat for same. It is up to me and others like me (in my opinion) to apply that heat. Go ahead and do whatever your conscience or lack thereof moves you to do. But do not expect those of a different mind not to protest the protest.
Thanks for the post. I think I will look up that
article.
And thanks for pointing out all the other "results" of his administration that, as you say, benefit nobody but the rich and/or the corporations or, as he himself once publicly bragged, "his base."
I know for a fact that when he ran for President in 2000, I told every single person I knew that if he becomes President, we're going to go to war with Iraq. (Nobody's gonna treat his daddy like Saddam did and get away with it.)
I didn't have a crystal ball. I had common sense and a good memory from the Gulf War when his father was President and how he didn't "finish the job." Seems a lot of other Americans forgot about that.
I really enjoyed reading your post and all the facts you raised that I failed to raise in mine. Thanks for the mention of the LA Times article. I'm going to try to look that up on the web. 
I know they don't. I said that in my post. NM
//
Actually, that post is right on. sm
You sound like a total lunatic, out of control and full of hatred. You sound like someone who could do just what "vs" says. You had best take a look at your behavior. YOUR posts are the ones who should be reported. You are one frightening person.
|
