Continued (hit enter too soon)

There isn't one person on this entire board who has wished anyone to be killed, especially an MP.

For you to suggest that someone got their wish is inflammatory, irresponsible and an outright LIE (not that that's a new communication technique used by you people).

As far as looting, anybody who steals a plasma TV, computer, etc., should be considered criminal and should be stopped in whatever way is necessary.

I just wonder what YOU would do if you had children and were in a situation where you had no water, no electricity, no food, nowhere to sleep for DAYS ON END.  Would you go into a Walmart and take some water, baby formula, food -- whatever it takes so that you CAN STAY ALIVE?  I've never been in a position like that, but I can pretty much guarantee that if I were, I'd do whatever I had to do to feed my children and keep them safe from harm.  If that included taking items from a store (that nobody was ever going to buy anyway), then you'd better believe I'd do it.

You sound very much like the person I heard in the store the other day, who said that she's let her kids FREEZE TO DEATH before accepting any help from Chavez.

Guess it's easy to see who has the family values in this crowd.

You're a disgrace.

• WHAT A LEADER!!!! - Anon
  • You got your wish. An MP was shot in the leg by looters. Women are being raped. - Happy Now
    • I don't know why the Administrator allows an INFLAMMATORY and IRRESPONSIBLE posts like this! - American Woman
      • Continued (hit enter too soon) - American Woman
        • Part of the original post by Anon. - May have been removed
          • Not true....nope. - Democrat
          • That's nonsense. - Zauber
          • post about looting..where? - gt
          • Looting - OP
            • I don't watch O'Reilly. ????? - Ummmmm.....
    • You are totally twisting what the OP said. - Democrat

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Same with Clinton versus Bush.  Clinton is a great, great man.  He is a flawed human being, but I know he has the country's best interests at heart.  By examining his life, it is obvious he is honored to serve our country.  Bush has been a loser all his life.  His business failures, his military "service," his drug use.  He had only had his over-inflated ego in mind when he stepped up and claimed that he was told by God to be president.  He has stayed in his little rich family cocoon all his life and has no interest in the lives of those less fortunate.  Time will prove that he did not gain the presidency due to any ability, but just that he was just a malleable dupe snagged by the neocons to fulfill their plans.

for a variety of reasons.  I know a teacher who does not really care for kids, but who wanted a job with no heavy lifting and summers off.  I started doing MT because it gave me an opportunity to use my English and typing skills in a part-time job with no commute.  Before that, I retired from a civil service job in a dangerous 'helping' profession.  I actually did help a lot of people, but I entered the field not out of do-gooderism, because I was a woman wanting to earn a man's wage, without a 4-year degree.  It enabled me to buy a house, which my former secretarial job would not have.

Altruism is generally an unreliable criterion for choosing a profession, unless it also pays you a living wage.  

Gee, I'd been wondering why we were paying the big bucks to these Fed officials and now I know.  So they can tell us things we could have told them (for a lot less money, too).

Perhaps we should call the Fed "MOOSE"  (the Ministry For Obvious Official Statements on the Economy)?  You can see now why we needed Palin, who knows how to field dress a moose.

...and then there was Obama the other day telling Congress not to spend too much money.  In case you didn't catch what I just said, this was Mr. Super-Deficit Obama, telling Congress they should watch the spending. 

I think that the White House has been listening to the national backlash on Daddy MoreBucks' drunken spending spree, and wants to have something they can float during Obama's next campaign to show how fiscally responsible he is. Certainly, there's no connection between what he says and what he does. 

But wait - we're already seeing Obama's next campaign, aren't we?  The man never stops campaigning.

Why would I ask a Jewish person if he or she were allowed to go to heaven according to someone's Christian beliefs?  Wouldn't that be silly?  And you're right.  It has nothing to do with whether Jews go to heaven.  But it has everything to do with whether you go to heaven or not, right?  Is your undying, unquestioning loyalty to Israel because you love Jews who will never be good enough to go to heaven according to your religion, or is because of the real estate the Jews inhabit in Israel?

You yourself wrote:  Then there is no Biblical alternative to supporting Israel and the Jewish people.

One more time:  DO JEWS GO TO HEAVEN?

If you again refuse to answer that, then my next question is where in the Bible does it say that said hypocrisy and disingenuousness are next to Godliness?

You also wrote:  If you are truly, then, a nonbeliever, it explains much of what I am seeing here.

And:  Are you all nonbelievers here?

How can you square that with your claim that you haven't judged anyone?