Can you say illiterate? LOL
Posted By: sm on 2009-02-27
In Reply to: eligible, you mean? - oh the irony of this...
xx
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
In other words if we don't agree w/you we are illiterate? (inside
Let me know who you are voting for so I can vote opposite. What a brat.
Are you illiterate, dyslexic, have ADHD or hard of hearing?
The question is about republicans and taking personal responsibility. The issue at hand in this thread is the Troopergate investigation and the McCain campaign's attempt to slay the messenger, claim bias and shift responsibility to Obama's camp. No where in there did anybody say anything about Barack Obama, his associations, terrorists or anything remotely related to republican hate mantra.
Sarah Palin was up to her eyeballs in this investigation for ethics violatins before McCain's VP pick announcement. The investigation was conducted in accordance with Alaska State Legislature protocol. They were holding hearings, presenting evidence, hearing arguments pro and con, questioning, examining and drawing conclusions aimed at an official response. This is how the State of Alaska conduct legitimate inquiries into allegations of misconduct. There was nothing covert about it. It was all above board. These are the facts, not the spin.
What they discovered led them to the conclusions found in that report. The report findings raise all kinds of other legitimate issues with regard to Paiin and her own past record of conducting ethics investigations aimed at her personal political detractors against whom she sought to exact revenge and her hypocritical position as McC campaign attack-dog-in-chief assigned to head up the Obama smear fest / hate machine.
There is more on this subject which I will post directly below about pubs who abuse power. I am wondering if you can help me understand the McC campaign statement that came out last night that tried unsuccessfully to accuse the Obama campaign for Palin's Troopergate woes.
If you are able, please stay on task and answer my question directly. Sarah Palin has been found to be in violation of Alaska State Ethics law all by her own ill-advised actions and exercising her very own poor judgment. How pray tell is Obama responsible for Palin's screw up? Keep in that we are not attacking Obama here. We are having straightforward dialog about Sarah Palin and the McC campaign's attempt deny her culpability in official finding of ethic violations. Please confine your response to the subject at hand.
|
