At least he condemned his actions
Posted By: sbMT on 2008-10-09
In Reply to: What you are speaks so loudly I cannot hear what you are saying McCain - MTPockets
and didn't lie about it!
Slick Willy did it on OUR time and dems seem to think he was the greatest thing since sliced bread it seems! AND THEN he lied! But that doesn't matter does it?
Seriously, when Bill did that all I heard was "it's not about personal issues, it's about how he runs the white house" well dangit if he gets that line so does Mccain! And at least Mccain isn't out getting around while he is in the white house!
Find something else to harp on please. I'm tired of hearing about something that happened over 30 years ago. If you want to go there, Ayers was a terrorist what 40 years ago????? So I guess that should still be viable evidence against Obama! But I forget that the tide doesn't roll both ways with the followers of Obama!
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
so if lies he is condemned, and if he tells the truth he is condemned
interesing reasoning
I haven't condemned anyone...just stating
xx
It was an abomination. Even Keith Olbermann condemned it.
there are a couple of differences. The Palin effigy was put there by the owner of a private residence who used his own possessions. What could they have charged him with? He cant vandalize his own home. The Obama effigy was was hung on a state university college campus using state property f an educational institution who is responsible for the safety of all of its students....that would be all males, female, blacks, whites and foreign nationals. They are in a position to make SOME sort or statement that condemns the action and assured student and parents that measures will be taken to prevent a fraternity prank for "gettng out of hand" again. Burglary and vandalism charges see reasonable, since that it what they did. And by the way, another major difference. Can't recall too many chapters in American history when women were hung by racist lynch mobs...black, on the other hand...well, that's another story. It was not even a decade back here in East Texas where a black man was kidnapped, tied to the back of a truck with a Confederate flag on the back of it, and dragged to his death, dismembered and beheaded. They tried the "boys willbe boy's" defense. It didn't work. The two (of the 3) perpetrators who could be proven to be racists were sentenced to death because it was a hate crime. The third one scraped by with life in prison because his racism could not be proven.
So. Tell me what your actions have been in
What have you, personally, done in terms of physically or financially supporting one or more of the children you feel you have 'saved'?
Just wondering.
Actions vs words.
Bush cannot recommend a constitutional amendment defining marriage as taking place between a man and a woman without a healthy respect for the Constitution itself. One does not merely walk into Iraq on the basis of a **** piece of paper. This story is a year and a half old. The publication who broke this story is about as far left as one can get. If the reputable publications from both sides of the fence felt it was a real story, they would have certainly run with it. They didn't. That' s my take on it after examining it.
your actions speak louder than
your weak attempts to backtrack. You really should be terribly ashamed. Racism hopefully will die out with your generation. There is no place in this world for hatred due to pigment differences in humans. I am just so dismayed at your ignorance.
Do You Believe Bush's Actions Justify Impeachment? sm
The results are amazing - 380,341 yes (86%).
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10562904/
 Righties - I do not care if it is not scientific, the American people have spoken.
No....I am advocating taking responsibility for your actions...
and not killing the result of those actions. But why teach responsibility when you can flush the problem right on out, right? sheesh.
With all due respect, your actions reflective of your personality actually prevent
your political views from coming through because most of your posts are nothing more than personal attacks on posters, and that kind of behavior doesn't do one thing to further your political cause.
I can't speak for everyone but I know I visit the Conservative board, as well as this board. You and AG have indicated you don't want liberals to post on your board, so I've tried to refrain from doing that. When you make such vitriolic, hateful statements about all liberals on one board and then come here and claim to be "respectful," that's very disingenuous, and that action doesn't do anything to increase your perceived credibility or honesty.
As I've said before on these boards, I'm interested in hearing all points of view but only if they reflect a truthful statement.
If there is a case of oppression caused by an activist judge or group, that's horrible and should be fought. But when it turns out to be something that isn't at all associated with activist judges or groups, then that lessens the credibility of the person who claimed that it was.
As far as being in a military family, thank you and your family for the sacrifices you made while your family member was in the military. When it comes to the military, it makes no difference whether or not I agree with the war because I am an avid supporter of the military and their families for the sacrifices they make to help keep us safe. I think their lives are very valuable and should be placed in jeopardy only when absolutely necessary to defend the United States.
The word is only reflective of your ACTIONS. Why don't you stop stalking her?
You're a scary, SCARY person. Seriously. You're obviously pathologic, unbalanced, in dire need of help and you're scary.
You've got to be kidding me? Defending their actions and blaming on Bush?
Sure, they have a right to be "activists" and to march and to protest. They do not have a right to smash in windows and vandalize property. What's worse is that many of these are not ativists. They have NO IDEA what they are protesting against. Ask them who the vice president of our country is, they can't tell you. They are young foolish kids who think it's fun to be out there causing trouble and posing as "activists" with a cause. It's rather inane to equate these things with true activists.
Yeah, and didn't Michelle just tell us to judge Obama on his actions? sm
They finally let her out of her box onto the Larry King show, and that's one of the things she said.
I don't like his actions, one little bit.
He's bamboozled millions of people.
|
