Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

And these are the WINNERS crying

Posted By: Never heard of a poor winner on 2008-11-17
In Reply to: You know, needlpoint's a good hobby - sm - Harbinger

Cripes, what would the Dems have done had they LOST!



Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

There will always be winners and losers.........nm
nm
Nobel Peace Prize Winners since 1975 sm

Nobel Peace Prize winners since 1975





template_bas

template_bas

From the Associated Press
October 12, 2007

Nobel Peace Prize winners since 1975:

* 2007: Former Vice President AL Gore and the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, for efforts to educate about the effects of man-made climate change.

* 2006: Muhammad Yunus and Grameen Bank, the Bangladeshi bank he founded.

* 2005: Mohamed ElBaradei, Egypt, and the International Atomic Energy Agency.

* 2004: Wangari Maathai, Kenya.

* 2003: Shirin Ebadi, Iran.

* 2002: Jimmy Carter, United States.

* 2001: U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan.

* 2000: Kim Dae-jung, South Korea.

* 1999: Medecins Sans Frontieres (Doctors Without Borders).

* 1998: David Trimble and John Hume, Northern Ireland.

* 1997: Jody Williams and the International Campaign to Ban Landmines, United States.

* 1996: Carlos Filipe Ximenes Belo and Jose Ramos-Horta, East Timor.

* 1995: Joseph Rotblat, Britain, and the Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs.

* 1994: Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat; Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres, Israel.

* 1993: Nelson Mandela and F.W. DE Klerk, South Africa.

* 1992: Rigoberta Menchu, Guatemala.

* 1991: Aung San Suu Kyi, Myanmar (also known as Burma).

* 1990: Mikhail Gorbachev, Soviet Union.

* 1989: The Dalai Lama, Tibet.






   

* 1988: The U.N. Peacekeeping Forces.

* 1987: Oscar Arias Sanchez, Costa Rica.

* 1986: Elie Wiesel, United States.

* 1985: International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, United States.

* 1984: Desmond Mpilo Tutu, South Africa.

* 1983: Lech Walesa, Poland.

* 1982: Alva Myrdal, Sweden; Alfonso Garcia Robles, Mexico.

* 1981: Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, or UNHCR.

* 1980: Adolfo Perez Esquivel, Argentina.

* 1979: Mother Teresa, India.

* 1978: Anwar Sadat, Egypt; Menachem Begin, Israel.

* 1977: Amnesty International, Britain.

* 1976: Betty Williams and Mairead Corrigan, Northern Ireland.

* 1975: Andrei Sakharov, Soviet Union.


I totally agree, gloating winners, sore losers and
sore Shelly
nope, y'all are sore democrat winners. Obamas are proven bigots and
they'll show their true colors again soon, not to worry.
This is the man's name, for crying out
driven into the ground. He said it himself, he got the name from a man who, evidently, never thought he would be running for president some day! Can't you be big enough to let it go?
i'm not crying
i only wanted cherry kool-aid

you're the one getting mean and upset
For crying out loud!

it's a FAMILY.  There are two little girls who were promised a puppy a long time ago by their parents -- win or lose -- after the election to reward them for tolerating the rigors of the campaign for such a long time.


One of the daughters is allergic, so that limits the breeds from which they can choose, and he said their first preference was to get a shelter dog, "a mutt like me," but because of the allergy, they might not be able to do that.


They're a normal family, and I think they're a beautiful family.  Why would any other family in the United States give a pet to their children?  Hopefully, the puppy's personality will match President-Elect Obama's and be even tempered and friendly, as opposed to the current White House canine that, unfortunately, reflects its owner's personality and bit a reporter the other day.


I personally believe this man has the capacity to be the best President in United States history.  All he needs is a chance, but when people get so petty as to criticize his decision to give his daughters a PUPPY, then it's clear that some people simply won't ever give him a chance, and that's so, so sad. 


Who was crying tears?
You are the most ridiculous person on here.  It cracks me up when you even try to make a point.  I really just feel sorry for you.  You are so determined to SHOVE your views in others face and so desperate sounding all the time.  Everyday you try so hard to show those Republicans where they went wrong.  This isn't a debate for you, this is some kind of life mission and it is just sad that this is all you have.  We are just sick of your frenzied wild posts that aren't well thought out.   Knock if off.  You are ruining what should be a place to discuss topics with your GET THE REPUBLICANS midlife crisis you are having. 
Oh for crying out loud on a crutch!!!!
One can't win for losing!  I've already said I'm a hillbilly, born and bred, so if you think I'm ridiculing anyone then consider I am ridiculing myself!!!!  Get over being so hung-up on Sara Palin, will ya??  Not everything revolves around her.
Oh for crying out loud on a crutch!
I am NOT a Democrat.  I am capable of independent thinking for myself thank you very much.
Huh? It's the Daily Show for crying out
It was funny. Or are they not allowed to make fun of Fox, CNN, and MSNBC?
Weren't you the one crying and whining

about how dare CA take away the rights they had given to gay people and how it shouldn't have been voted on and blah blah blah.  You even brought up women's right to vote and how about we overturn that....blah blah blah.  Now you want to take away the benefits that marriage has always had just because gay people want everything equal.  I do believe that you were one of the ones that said it wasn't fair for gays to have to settle for civil unions and how dare I suggest such a thing. 


Honestly....I'd agree to this just to shut you people up because I'm so sick to death of hearing about gay rights and poor gay people.....blah blah blah.  Once again....I guess the Bible thumpers that you hate so much will do the compromising and once again give up something of ours to make you happy.  Feel better now?


Thank you...nice to have a second voice crying out in the wilderness...
just put on your kevlar and come right on in. :)
Oh for crying out loud on a cripple's crutch!!!!
Can you not READ?  Did I not post the issues......whatever they're called.... along with the date of the vote?  Check it out for yourself.  The voting record is good enough for me but you rabid pubs wouldn't believe anything against John McCain if God Himself came down and wrote it on the end of your nose.
Oh for crying out loud on a cripple's crutch!!!!
lighten up.  I would never make light of Jesus and I take hearty exception to your even suggesting such a thing.  I do believe I was replying to someone who (I hope) posted a tongue-in-cheek statement that I might be the next messiah.  I am IMPRESSED BY NO ONE.
Do you think these guys would be crying for John Kerry's daughters to go if he had won?
Somehow, I seriously doubt it. 
The simply fact is you were whining and crying about us being on your board sm
when you are almost just as often on ours.  Is that a hard concept to get through your noggin or do I need to hire a sky writer?
For crying out loud. His target group IS workers
are so low that they come up not owing tax at the end of the year, then it would not be possible to give them a tax cut or a tax credit, unless it is a refundable tax credit. So far, you have not provided any evidence that Obama is proposing a REFUNDABLE tax credit. As a matter of fact, why do you supposed he call this tax credit "Making WORK pay." The credit will zero out at zero tax liability unless it is a refundable tax credit. Again, it seems like you cannot produce any evidence that this is the case. Or can you? What about the socialist question with regard to progressive tax reform proposals only being socialist at Obama's hands, an no other president in history since 1913, including the 7 republicans who raise the top income bracket rates to as high as 63% to 94%, as opposed to Obama, whose intent is to restore that rate back to 39.6% as it was in 2000 when Bush took office?