And also not ''transparent'' nm

Posted By: Mythbuster on 2009-06-03
In Reply to: Saw another estimate of $30 grand, and then a report that - the White House refused to say how much it cost.

x

Complete Discussion Below:

marks the location of current message within thread

Anybody else see this on the news? - cj
- I think it is great - Trigger Happy
- Oh, pul-EEEZE. Any pres., Pub or Dem, deserves a - S/M
  - OH PLEEEESE. I go out on a date night, but - sure as heck not to a Broadway play
    - date night at home - cj
      - PERFECT!!! - I agree. No message below
- their date night out -- - Amanda
  - There are no romantic - Trigger Happy
    - Sacrifice is for the little people - Mythbuster
  - just curious... - dnh
    - because it is a requirement -- - Amanda
      - that doesn't answer the question - dnh
        I do not know why - it is just what happens =- - Amanda
    - Just as with monarchs in days of yore - Mythbuster
      - I doubt you would get very many takers if you secluded them! nm - Amanda
- I saw last night where they said that - Amazing ...
- Saw another estimate of $30 grand, and then a report that - the White House refused to say how much it cost.
  - And also not ''transparent'' nm - Mythbuster
  - Yes, arrogant.. distasteful, yet I am not surprised - Obama is a hypocrite in so many ways.nm
  - Washington Times estimates at least $250,000 (link inside) - TechSupport
    - taking back our country - Bonnie
      - Just voting once every four years isn't enough - anymore.
      - It's called voting! nm - Amanda
        Voting! Wow! Why didn't I think of that? - Mythbuster
        Oh yes....voting. - Trigger Happy
        voting - Bonnie
    - Whoops! Here's the link to the Times story... - TechSupport
  - Sounds like "change" we can believe in! NM - CHA-CHING

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database