Ahem. I just disagreed with him....
Posted By: sam on 2008-10-30
In Reply to: Take the Barak Obama test....sm - m
100%. Go figure.
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
ahem
h-o-w-s t-h-a-t r-e-c-o-r-d d-e-a-l c-o-m-i-n-g?
I disagreed 98% - NM
x
I disagreed 98%.
Good thing I'm voting for McCain. LOL.
Who said I disagreed?..(sm)
I believe in equal opportunity teabagging....ROFL.
Hey....Ahem....and friend Lurker...
another cut and paste for you. Please pay special attention to the portion regarding Mr. Clinton and how he made the focus of his presidency regime change...so much so he signed it into LAW. So it wasn't just the big bad Bushes....your fav prez Mr. Clinton signed into LAW in 1998, American policy for regime change in Iraq...OH SAY IT AIN'T SO....but you didn't read THAT in the CNN article did you??? Typical, typical...typicallll.
The Act found that Iraq had, between 1980 and 1998 (1) committed various and significant violations of International Law, (2) had failed to comply with the obligations to which it had agreed to following the Gulf War and (3) further had ignored Resolutions of the United Nations Security Council. The Act declared that it was the Policy of the United States to support regime change. The Act was passed in the House [2] and Senate [3] and signed into law by the US President Bill Clinton on October 31, 1998. Its stated purpose was: to establish a program to support a transition to democracy in Iraq. Specifically, Congress made findings of past Iraqi military actions in violation of International Law and that Iraq had denied entry of United Nations Special Commission on Iraq (UNSCOM) inspectors into its country to inspect for weapons of mass destruction. Congress found: It should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and to promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime. On December 16, 1998, President Bill Clinton mandated Operation Desert Fox, a major four-day bombing campaign on Iraqi targets.
Can we let this regime change stuff drop now??
Ahem...that was due to what was done in Congress during those years....
and you should really give credit where credit was due...there was a Republican majority in congress during most of Clinton's years as President and THAT is where all the changes are made, friend...in CONGRESS. So, on behalf of the Republican majority congress during the Clinton years, THANK YOU SO MUCH for endorsing the job they did, but please to give them the credit along with Mr. Clinton for all those years of prosperity you enjoyed.
I really love the way you paint it with such a broad brush...like Bush in and of himself could do any of those things. One man CAN'T. Congress is in the driver's seat. And the sound bite of most of the world not dependent on our good will hate us. And who would that be? France? They have ALWAYS hated us. It started right after we liberated their country during World War II and they immediately told us to get out. Yeah, the French, they loved us. Russia? Yeah, they realllyyy loved us. China? Wellll, they certainly loved Bill and Hill and the offshoring they did...google them and China some time for a real eye opener. Canada? Yeah they hate us, until they need to come here for medical care they can't get in their own country because of socialized medicine. Exactly what countries loved us before Bush and hate us now?
If you really want it back like it was in Bill's time, let's elect a Republican Congress. You will have it back then. And it really doesn't matter as much who is President...it matters who has the majority in Congress. And what pray tell has the Democratic majority done since they have been in office? Zip, zilch, nada as far as I can see. All those promises they made? Not one have they met. Why are you not posting about that?
AHEM - MY BABY HAD NO BRAIN. sm
It was totally 100% incompatible with life, so don't give me that bull**t about the health vs murder argument.
You are a cold-hearted SOB if you think I aborted for any other reason.
I took it as well and disagreed about 98% of the time, .....sm
I liked the way they phrased most of the questions....just asking your opinion on the issues without too much bias. I also like the way the results were shown.
I haven't seen one for McCain out there, but I'll keep a eye out and post it if I find it.
I also disagreed with him 98% of the time....sm
And I also would like to see if there's one for John McCain out there...I'll look as well...
I didn't think that you disagreed with me.
I just wanted to make myself more clear before someone pounced on me. LOL!
I disagree - even though I disagreed with her a lot
Okay, actually I think never agreed with her :-), but I still enjoy reading her posts because they give me a different perspective to think about. Think about it...if you only listen to one side and think everything that side is doing is perfect and the other side is always wrong you will never learn things. I find myself often saying I was wrong about this or I never thought about that. I still have some beliefs that don't alter, but I do like to hear a difference of opinions as long as it's not cutting down someone simply because they don't agree with you. So I do miss JTBB's posts. And Gourdpainter too. Although I think I ALWAYS disagree with GP. Lots of times I'd think, oh brother... but there are times where I would say - now they may have something there.
Ahem...I just heard "O" as you guys like to call him...
state that McCain told him on the call that he was going to suspend is campaign and asked him to do the same, to which "O" said he responded that his campaign would talk to McCain's campaign. So I fail to see why he is saying he didn't expect the announcement.
Again with the lying. Obama has lied (or flipped or whatever you want to call it) as many times as McCain has. Let's get real here.
Ahem. The West Bank is not theirs. Neither is Gaza.
So just how does that justify illegal settlements and settler violence against Palestinians in the West Bank?
Speaking of terrorists...ahem....I mean pubs....(sm)
which one was it that was comparing the pub party to the Taliban....as insurgents...LOL.
Oh yeah...that was Pete Sessions.....
http://video.google.com/videosearch?hl=en&q=sessions%20taliban&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wv#
Ahem....I couldn't care less how many times Clinton...
"had a cigar" with Lewinsky. As a "values" voter, my problem was that he lied before the grand jury (and what he lied ABOUT has nothing to do with it) and that is a felony. He is an attorney, for pete's sake, he fully KNEW he was committing perjury. If he had an ethical bone in his body he would have resigned. Not sure who you are referring to with the other issue...Rudy Guiliani maybe? So far as I know he has not committed any felonies. He is not my guy at this point and probably will not be, but it would not be because he had a mistress...it would be because he is not pro life.
I saw this last year. It was great. I have always liked Colin, even though I disagreed w/him...sm
I do understand why he left his position. It takes a real con to hold his head high when they know they are lying to you with a straight face.
That's pretty silly.....McCain disagreed with Bush about as much as...
the Dems did. LOL. And yes, I have heard the Obama ad that McCain "voted with Bush" 90% of the time. Problem with that is...Bush can't vote. Only Congress can. Sheeshhhh. LOL.
|
