Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Actually, not.

Posted By: TechSupport on 2009-05-01
In Reply to: That's exactly right! An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. - nm - lall

Surprisingly, most of the studies on the economics of preventive care have not supported the old "ounce of prevention" adage - another bit of unexamined folk wisdom that we take for granted. "It ain't what we know that's the problem; it's what we know that ain't so."

I quote from the "fact check" on Obama's 100-day speech, which quotes from the New England Journal of Medicine:

________________________

OBAMA: "I think one basic principle that we know is that the more we do on the (disease) prevention side, the more we can obtain serious savings down the road. ... If we're making those investments, we will save huge amounts of money in the long term."

THE FACTS: It sounds believable that preventing illness should be cheaper than treating it, and indeed that's the case with steps like preventing smoking and improving diets and exercise. But during the 2008 campaign, when Obama and other presidential candidates were touting a focus on preventive care, the New England Journal of Medicine cautioned that "sweeping statements about the cost-saving potential of prevention, however, are overreaching." It said that "although some preventive measures do save money, the vast majority reviewed in the health economics literature do not."

And a study released in December by the Congressional Budget Office found that increasing preventive care "could improve people's health but would probably generate either modest reductions in the overall costs of health care OR INCREASES in such spending within a 10-year budgetary time frame."

(In other words, the CBO punted the question because even with their research resources they couldn't prove the value of prevention - costs might reduce modestly or might increase. Thanks, CBO!)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090429/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_fact_check_obama_8


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database