Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

AW, I am disappointed that you would defend

Posted By: Suzie on 2005-08-09
In Reply to: Laura Bush - American Woman

anyone on these boards wishing anyone else to burn in hell for eternity, particularly two very young and inexperienced women.

As far as the conservative board, if it is a "cesspool," it is at least in part because conservative posters cannot post conservative opinions there without being attacked relentlessly. I suppose it is fortunate for the liberals on this board that they have not had to experience such conditions when voicing their liberal opinions here.


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

    The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
    To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


    Other related messages found in our database

    Ohh I'm so disappointed

    a day without being talked down to is like....a good day.


    also disappointed
    But one comment really jumped out at me and that was when Obama said "in my first term as president." I'm hoping he doesn't get one term and he's already looking at more than one. May God help us all.
    I'm so disappointed....

    I was hoping to see a reply like....oh..for the love of Pete or Michael...whichever brother struck your fancy.  Instead we just get a red angry face. 


    We may not agree on political issues, but I'm still sending ya some love. 


    Cheers, my friend. 


    I'm disappointed in you, as well, Lila.

    I tried to have an exchange of ideas with you some time ago.  I had hoped that maybe you were someone who was sincere, reasonable and truly were here to debate.  You indicated you would answer my post *more in depth later.*  That was on May 13 -- a month ago tomorrow.  You have yet to respond, outlining your own views as I had outlined mine in an attempt to have an honest debate.


    Instead you have elected to hijack threads to bring conflict to this board.  You pretend to be *respectful* when in fact you are not.  This post was clearly addressed to Liberals, but why should you have to respect that?  You should control everything, shouldn't you?  All the boards on the internet.  Which religion I should believe in.  Who I am allowed to love.  When I'm allowed to die.  Every single thing in my life (and in all Americans' lives) that is simply none of your business should be controlled by YOU and those who share your beliefs.


    You have numerous posts repeatedly beating up Democrat because she posted a post with a *bad word* in it, yet the *bad spirit* of the words written by Ann Coulter is far worse than any one curse word. 


    And your very own President described the Constitution as a piece of paper, using God's name in vain.  What kind of honest devout Christian President would refer to the Constituation (which he swore to uphold and protect) as *only a G**D***** piece of paper*? 


    I admit to being nowhere near as perfect as you are, Lila, but sometimes I get angry and a curse word will escape my lips.  But regardless of how angry I get, I can't ever bring myself to *damn God* in my speech.  It's just something I've never done.


    And since I'm not near the perfect Christian that you are, Lila, I won't be going to heaven, as those of certain Christian beliefs keep telling me.  These superhumans hold the *key* to heaven, and if don't believe EXACTLY as they demand I must, then I am doomed to eternal hell and damnation.


    The original article posted by Lurker, that has been littered by your posts and those of your gang, is about Ann Coulter's self-professed *superiority* to ALL LIBERALS.  She refers to liberalism as a religion, and by doing so, she is belittling every single religous liberal in America.  It's about her uncontrollable hatred and mean spiritedness, and I must say that you and your friends on this board do an excellent job of mimicking her.  They do say that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.  Ann would be very pleased. 


    You're a fraud, Lila.  I had hoped you would be different, had hoped you were a genuine and honest person.  But instead, you're just another Ann Coulter when it comes to the motive behind your presence here.  You're only here to create discomfort for others.  You have nothing positive to offer.  The only difference between you and Ann is that SHE'S the one with the book and book tour, TV appearances and is making millions of dollars off the pain of people.  But if there IS one thing I have faith in, Lila, it's that you're made of the *same stuff* as Ann Coulter, and that should certainly take you somewhere in life.


    You pretended to be someone who, a month ago, claimed to want to answer my post *in more depth.*  Why did you lie about doing that, Lila?  And why did you instead choose to just be like all the other snipers who insist in inserting themselves on this board?  You're choosing hollow, meaningless, childish swipes over thoughtful reasoned communication.  I'm very disappointed in you, Lila.  I had hoped your heart was pure and your character authentic.


    As far as *bad language* is concerned, I think I'd rather be told the truth by someone who curses like a sailor than to be lied to repeatedly by someone hiding behind a Bible.  The *badness* is in the spirit and the deed, Lila, not in the words.  And to repeatedly attack Democrat for making a human error regarding a word, after she apologized repeatedly to you, isn't a good thing, Lila.  There's no substance or intelligence there.  Just plain old nastiness.


    But you and Ann already knew that, didn't you?


    Surprised, but not disappointed
    I was a little surprised with the outcome, especially Edward's finish, not at all what I expected. I would be happy with an Obama or a Clinton nomination.

    I haven't paid much attention to the republican candidates, yet, but as things progress, you can bet I'll be watching.
    I'd be disappointed, just as I would be if McCain is
    Time to roll, guys! Let's see those fists fly! Got plenty o' popcorn & beer ready for a night of true entertainment.
    Nah, not scared. Just disappointed.
    That the ignorant have elected the inexperienced and we're all gonna spend the next 4 years paying for it.


    Not scared. Just disappointed.
    That the uninformed have elected the inexperienced, and now we're going to have to pay for it for the next 4 years.
    I am SO disappointed, JTBB
    .
    I'm disappointed in Obama if this is true.

    Disappointed in you Tech. Thought you had
    better judgment and sense than that, thought you were one of the intelligent ones around here. Guess I was wrong.
    Personally, I am disappointed in Pres Bush, but namecalling is really infantile.
    I think it detracts from logical debate.  Pointing out people's personal flaws is another really bad debate tactic.  Need to rise above that high school behavior and stick to the opinons and there are plenty of bad things to say right now.  Don't make it personal.
    Would you defend her?

    Thursday, March 9, 2006
    Last modified Wednesday, March 8, 2006 11:16 PM PST


    Woman sues for alleged firing over talk show bumper sticker

    By: TERI FIGUEROA - Staff Writer

    VISTA ---- A San Diego County woman is suing her former employer, accusing her manager of firing her on the spot when she saw the woman's car had a bumper sticker advertising a progressive talk radio station.

    The suit also alleges that, after seeing the sticker, the employer commented that the woman could be a member of al-Qaida.

    In a civil suit filed at the county courthouse in Vista, Linda Laroca is targeting both her former manager, Beverly Fath, and the company she briefly worked for last year, Advantage Sales and Marketing, Inc.

    Neither Laroca nor the defendants could be reached for comment Wednesday. Laroca's attorney declined comment.

    Laroca, who was hired by the company as a sales representative, is seeking lost wages and damages for wrongful termination for violations of both public policy and the state labor code. She is also claiming state constitutional violations and emotional distress.

    The California labor code prohibits employers from controlling or directing the political activities of employees.

    According to Laroca's suit, the bumper sticker in question read only: 1360 Air America Progressive Talk Radio.

    The nationwide syndicated radio programming from left-wing Air America, which describes itself as progressive entertainment talk radio features show hosts such as comedian and author Al Franken. The network programming is carried locally by radio station KLSD 1360 AM.

    A call to Clear Channel-owned KLSD on Wednesday afternoon was not immediately returned.

    In her Feb. 21 claim, Laroca asserts that on Oct. 8, three weeks after she started working for the marketing company, Fath called her on a Saturday and requested they meet at a nearby grocery store parking lot so Laroca could pass on some documents Fath needed.

    During the brief encounter, Laroca charges, the manager pointed to the bumper sticker ---- the only one on Laroca's car ---- and remarked that it was a new sticker and called it that Al Franken left-wing radical radio station.

    Laroca alleges in her suit that Fath then told her, The country is on a high state of alert. For all I know, you could be al-Qaida.

    A stunned Laroca laughed nervously at the statement, the suit alleges, and then was dealt the final blow when Fath fired her on the spot.
    Not asking you to defend ... just an fyi...
    in looking for answers to DW's question as to who was opposing the expansion and why, I ran onto an explanation of the President's health care proposal...which I hate to admit, I did not know the particulars of, because no one in media is reporting it. It was in article by the HEW Secretary. At any rate...Bush proposes a $15,000 tax cut for every American family who buys their own private health insurance. It is estimated that it would cover 20 million more American families...the whole family, not just the children...where the SCHIP expansion would only cover 3 million more, and a good many of those newly eligible kids (under higher income limits) are already covered by private health insurance, according to the CBO study commissioned by the bipartisan congressional committee looking at the SCHIP expansion. What that basically means is that children already covered by private insurance would leave that and go to a public assistance program.

    Just some alternative information. You do not need to respond and I am not trying to pick a fight. Just giving information.
    So, how do you defend Mr. O's back-
    the comments, the associations, etc......ROFL.
    as usual....can't defend...

    //


    Do you also defend the innocent

    people in our local prisons because I'm sure that there are a few in there who are actually innocent......however, most of them are NOT.


    As for me not knowing for sure whether they were indeed tortured or not......how do you know that they were tortured?  Were you there?  Did you talk to them?  Do you have a pin pal at Gitmo, do ya?


    I'm sure there are some innocent men at Gitmo but this is war.  It was war when the terrorists killed thousands of Americans in one day and then celebrated their actions.  We have gone from a 9/11 mentality to a pre 9/11 mentality.  We seem to have forgetten that we were attacked and that these people desire nothing more than our death. 


    You mean you defend all people who
    are innocent. You cannot know someone else's heart no matter how much you want to think you do. When it comes to these terrorists, they have only one feeling for America and Americans - cold, calculated, murderous, black, hate! You need to wake up to this fact and accept it. I hope you do not think for a moment they would try to defend you for anything. They would cut your heart out and roast it in a NY minute!
    I'm sure you defend Cindy Sheehan just the same, don't you?
    Not a bet I'd take.
    I certainly don't defend the remarks, but they were taken out of context
    Obviously, the example Bennett used of aborting every black child was a very poorly thought out example, but his remarks were also taken grossly out of context by the mainstream media.  He went on say it would be a morally reprehensible thing to do.  He was commenting on the idiots that said that crime or poverty was down since the legalizing of abortion.  He thinks abortion of any kind is wrong...he was turning their logic around on them.  He certainly does not think that every black baby should be aborted.  GRANTED, there are radical right wingers (the KKK, aryan nation etc.) would think this was a great idea, but they are radical and not the mainstream as Ms. Libby FALSELY stated...
    Go ahead and defend a racist
    even if it's so out of character for a liberal.
    Sheez! How do Repubs defend this?
    Boggles the mind! But also learned another curious thing tonight - several people have told me they can't buy any ammunition for their guns, I think they told me AR15's or whatever the civilian model of an M16 is? - they said the rounds are not available by mail or at stores and they are told it's all being stopped at the ports and sent to Iraq. Say what??

    Anybody else having a similar experience or know anything else about this? Would be curious to know if the situation in Iraq is really so bad that all civilian ammo has to be confiscated so it can be sent there.

    Hard to defend something that isn't happening.
    No problem getting ammo here in the great NW.
    I am not going to defend Free Republic sm
    only because no website knows who it is that is posting on it.  I used to post on FR but they banned me because I didn't walk lock-step with their philosophy, which does not tolerate dissent. However, I have seen death threats right here on this site, so linking this guy to a web site isn't really relative.  I hope they prosecute him.  He is sick. 
    Not necessary to defend Obama. He's doing just fine
    .
    Nice try. Once again, only way to defend Obama is
    nm
    I defend anyone who tried to save thousands of
    nm
    I defend all innocent people....nm
    nm
    I hope you're not one of the ones who defend the lies that ...sm
    launched the war in Iraq ???

    If so, the hypocrisy is reeking.
    You are absolutely right. And I certainly do not defend Bush on most things.
    But as I said in my post to Lurker below, this is not exactly the political forum I am used to posting in. I just could not resist commenting on this issue as I feel it is deeply disturbing and all parents should look at this closely.  
    Even Newt Gingrich can't *defend the indefensible*

    if you missed it on Hannity and Colmes, you can see the video here.  Newt in his own words.  Definitely worth watching.


    http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/05/12.html#a8260


     


    When you can't defend the present why do you always bring up the past?

    Why do you defend killing of innocent civilians?

    I have never said I defend Hezbollah.  I don't defend Hezbollah.  They're terrorists, and they're horrible.


    But blindly defending Israel, regardless of what they do, doesn't work for me either.  What is most disquieting to me is that you defend Israel's placement of landmines to kill innocent civilians, designed to go off at a later date when people least expect it?  Why don't you consider that terrorism, as well?


     


    Maybe we can get David Ogden to defend him? LOLOLOL!
    Nothing like a hypocrite take a fall to make MY day!
    I don't see how a conservative, prolifer could attempt to defend his statements...nm
    x
    My post ' I defend all innocent people' was a reply to the
    question

    'Do you also defend the innocent people in our local prisons because I'm sure that there are a few in there who are actually innocent..'






    Even quoting the New Testament here will not defend the horrifying tragedy what was the Bush adminis
    nm