Moving to California and selling a few things

Hi All,

I am taking a long break and moving to California. Yeap that's right I am just up and leaving. So I must travel Lite.

I am in search of a house to rent--so if any of you Californians know of a place I would appreciate it.

I am selling: This would be great for someone thinking of evidently having their own accounts.

C-phone and headset with instruction manual (paid $200)

USB universal foot pedal (paid $100)

Panasonic Cassette transcriber with foot pedal (regular cassette) (paid $250) Great for those doctors still using regular cassettes or great doing general transcription work.

Resource materials:

Medical Transcription Guide Do's and Don'ts 3rd edition (this is the most recent one) (paid $44)

Nurse's Pocket Drug Guide

PDR Nurse's Drug Handbook

Dorland's Pocket Medical Dictionary 27th edition

Sloane's Medical Word Book

The AAMT Book of Style

Stedman's Medical Dictionary (Illustrated in color) 28th edition with CD

The language of Medicine with CD inside

Medical Transcriptionist's Desk Reference (Carolyn Collins-Gates)

CD transcription sample reports

I would like to sell all as one price so best offer.

• Moving to California and selling a few things - Pam
  • It is a year old. n/m - Pam
  • How old is USB pedal and what are you asking for it? nm - DJ

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

I have just graduated. Is anyone hiring on-site

locally?

point out the bad things about it. 

It's expensive and time-consuming for employers to train a new MT.  You have to consider this from their perspective.  They run a business, not a support group.

Being new to the industry, you won't know this, but the chance you want them to give you requires them to hire someone to, basically, do all your work over again and then tell you what's wrong with it, sometimes for six months.  You're asking them to spend in the range of $20-30,000 in addition to what they paid YOU to do the work inadequately . . . so that you can have a chance.

If you've taken an employment test with them and have not scored in the 95% and above range, or, with some companies 98%, they're not going to take you because they believe that after completing a course, you should have been able to make that 95 or 98%.  If you cannot, it tells them that you spent a year or two in school and still didn't get the message.  They're not going to give you a chance because they think you already had one.

They also look at the school you attended.  If that school has a reputation for turning out poor prospects, then the employer knows that hiring you will be a waste.  He also knows that you could have determined in advance which schools he will hire from and whose graduates do well, and he thinks that you made your choice about jobs when you chose your school, and if you chose a school that he won't hire from . . . well, that was your decision.  Not his.  He owes you nothing.

Before you choose a school, do your research.  Going with the lowest bidder gets you a low-bid education.  You need to go with a school that can demonstrate results.  Graduates of those schools do not have trouble getting a job.

If you have already completed a school and cannot get a job, you can go on to a better school, or you can look locally for a physician office employer and work your way up from there. 

Most college programs train only at the "physician office" level.  Most distance programs train at that level, as well, so you should have the skills for that kind of job.  Once there, you can work your way up to a larger office, a larger clinic, perhaps a local hospital.  Along the way, you can improve your skills by self study.  It may take three to five years, but you can advance that way.  It's often less expensive just to take a better course, even if you've already completed one.

If you are just out of school and nobody wants to hire you, they're telling you that your academic preparation is not what they consider to be adequate for the jobs they have. 

I'm going to respond to you, item by item –

>>>The seasoned MT's and recruiters are using this forum to vent on their frustration with the newer MT's.<<<
     What I saw was one harshly worded message from MTSO. As a former business owner myself, I see where they are coming from. While I do not agree with the manner in which they expressed their views, I can look beyond their frustration and understand how they feel. Try to look beyond how MTSO expressed their views and focus more on what they were saying.


>>>This is just my opinion, but if you need to put others down to make yourself feel superior go to the site where the seasoned MT's are.<<< 
     Putting others down to make yourself feel superior is what kids do. And why are you using the term “seasoned MTs" when you speak of people with a lot of experience. You make us sound like a steak going on the grill.


>>>This site is for newer MT's that need advice and a place to talk to other new MT's.  Seems inappropriate for the experienced MT's to jump on this site to talk about what makes them mad about the newer MT's.<<< 
     What MTO did is give you serious advice, and you need to seriously consider WHAT was said rather than HOW it was said. And if you want to speak of what’s inappropriate, I feel it is very inappropriate for someone trying to break into the industry to post messages on the Main Board asking for help with their test.


>>>Has it been that long that we cannot remember what it was like, or was it like this. 
     Every day of my life. And I was grandfathered for this job. I never went to school for it. If you had a good ear and good spelling skills, you received on-the-job training. I vividly remember my first day on the job ... I think I transcribe 250 lines in 8 hours. And the work was filled with blanks and errors. Now, I'm asked to do some dictators that more experienced MTs say they can’t do.


>>>I did not have to apply for a job with my computer.  I actually got to speak face to face with someone hiring.  Maybe if my lack of experience did not charm them, I could.  I think it is harder to apply on paper than it was for us in person. 
     I agree with this. I do very well with face-to-face interviews. With respect to applying for a job over the Internet, it’s become “dog eat dog” so to speak. With so much being outsourced to foreign countries, there are thousands of MTs in this country who are fighting for the same jobs with the same companies. You’re no longer a person; now, you’re a white piece of paper with black ink on it. And that’s all you have to sell yourself beyond the competition.


<<<Let's lighten up a little bit ladies and play nice.<<<
     Kill joy!  

your instructor could answer better than anyone here could.  In general, when to edit for grammar, what format to use, and how to decode mumblers are all things that you will get better at with more and more practice, so don't get too discouraged.    For those hard to understand dictations, try playing at different speeds (even faster) and going back to the difficult parts after you have transcribed the entire report.  As you do more and more reports, you can look back through them to figure out what a dictator might be most likely to say at that point, which may give you a clue.  Another trick is to put key phrases around the part you can't understand in Google and see if you come up with something.  You can put an asterisk for the part you can't understand and put the key phrase in quotes and sometimes that will help, for example "* prostatic hypertrophy." 

I'm sure they'll ask the basics about your experience, what work type you prefer, hours/lines you can do each day, etc.   They may ask you questions to see how well you know your stuff.    They should also ask you if you have any questions and they should tell you what they are looking for, what their platform is, how they pay, etc.