to the contrary,
Posted By: sm on 2005-09-06
In Reply to: did everyone graduate MQs "Code fo Conduct" course? -- what a crock - MadamX
you, madam-complainer, are probably one of the people who need it -- good information there that not every one would know.
Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old. To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
Wow. That's quite contrary to the standard.
Usually, 32 hours is part-time and 37 starts full-time.
You've been quite fortunate!
I HAVE to get to work now. I don't wanna. LOL I'd rather stay and play! LOL
I'm not discouraging newbies. Quite the contrary,
I am telling them that they can save money on their education and still be able to break into MT.
And here's what I do know. I have 7 years in QA. I have trained new hires who were fresh out of school and I can tell you that not one of them was in any way qualified to work from home. Every single one of them desperately needed to work in an office along side some qualified MTs who could give them the benefit of their years experience and their vast knowledge all acquired the old fashioned way, they worked for it!
The reason that MTs cannot earn a decent cpl wage is because of the enormous influx in underqualified newly graduated MTs who have degraded the profession of medical transcription with their lack of experience, minimal knowledge base, and extremely poor grammar skills. I just don't believe any of the online schools are worth what they charge. I don't believe anyone can get a decent education online. And when I speak of a community college, I don't mean a "vo-tech school" as someone mentioned above. I mean an accredited junior/community college. Not some fly-by-night, you-can-earn-$70,000-a-year-as-an-MT-from-the-comfort-of-your-own-home-in-your-pajamas-with-your-babies-on-your-lap school!
I mean bricks and mortars, computer lab, books and teachers, fellow students and classroom school.
nada - just feeling contrary today
On the contrary, Christians ARE expected by God to judge sin. sm
There are numerous versus to back this up. There is a verse that says if we as Christians observe a fellow Christian falling into sin, we are to go to that person (in love, not condemnation) and try and guide them back onto the right path away from destruction. How are we to follow God's laws if we do not judge right and wrong? That verse has been taken so far out of context.
WHAT WE ARE NOT TO JUDGE is another person's relationship with God or whether that person has obtained salvation or is saved.
WE ARE EXPECTED TO JUDGE SIN. I'll be happy to dig up the verses for anyone who would like to see them.
|