to sue who e/m'd me

Posted By: sm on 2007-11-08
In Reply to: cc is for solids and mL for liquids - sm

it seems you are being sarcastic about how 'easy' this is. Maybe not, I don't know. For one, pg 63 in the BOS does not clarify the questions I have, saying nothing about solids vs liquids, for example. It does not say to use it for everything either. I've been corrected one way, and then corrected back another, which is why I have been trying to document a concrete answer to this. Thanks for taking the time to answer.

Complete Discussion Below:

marks the location of current message within thread

cc is for solids and mL for liquids - sm
- RE: cc versus ml - klownmom
- to sue who e/m'd me - sm
  - Why not just reply to her e-mail??? (nm) - joan
- cc=mL from what I've seen - Not a mathematician
- and the QA people wonder why we ever get anything right. It is always changing. - ME
  - QA didn't make the rules or change the rule. We have to learn 'em - SM - QALady
    - Well now, - nana
      - I agree with you, Nana. It's an uphill battle. SM - QALady
        Agreed, standard set, so - nana
      - AMEN Nanna - Way to Go
        You are so right on - nana
- We have been told to use mL for all, regardless if dictated cc. Dangerous abbrev. blahblahblah nm - Bwhup
  - Ain't it great that - nana
    - I, for one, stand with you. - nm
      - I agree, too. I'm just so tired of it all, don't have the energy left to argue with 'em any - Bwhup

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database