likely for uniformity and formality --
Posted By: tinkerbell on 2007-11-21
In Reply to: but why say #A - Sunny
also so that you include the # sign
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
I think it's more for uniformity across the board.
For example, some MTs type two centimeters, some 2 cm, some 2-cm, some 2 centimeters, some 2 cms, and that's just one thing. AAMT should be looked upon as just guidelines to go by so everyone is on the same page because that's how it should be IMO.
That's why it is so important that there is uniformity regarding...SM
style and format which the BOS has tried to do. I don't always agree with the BOS, but at least it is trying to standardize things. Things like spelling and terminology misuse are pretty much black and white -- either you spell correctly or you don't.
Another practice that the MTSOs have gotten into is allowing the clients to dictate their preferences to the point where it is in direct opposition with the accepted norm and sometimes are just totally incorrect! Facilities hire MTSO for their expertise in medical transcription and, therefore, should let us do what we do best rather telling us how to do our job. I don't tell the doctor how to treat the patient and he shouldn't tell me how to do my job.
With the exception of formatting, the MTSOs should be giving the clients a copy of the rules and standards MTs follow. I understand that formatting will change from client to client and in my opinion, that is an acceptable variation.
I worked for an MTSOs who contracted with a client -- a hospital -- whose transcriptionists had "always" typed gravida and para values in Roman numerals, i.e. gravida III, para II. When the MTSO contracted with the hospital, the MTs typed it according to the BOS, but were quickly corrected by a file clerk in the HIM department stating we were doing it wrong. Did the MTSO stick up for its MTs and say we follow the BOS and that is the accepted norma? Nope. An email went to the MTs saying that on this particular account gravida and para should be expressed as Roman numerals!
This shouldn't be happening! We are professionals and should be treated as such. We are not show dogs jumping through hoops!
So see, I'm not some evil QA person who lives to find errors. I am a QA person who sees problems on both side of the issue!
|
