actually....

Posted By: desertflour on 2005-08-04
In Reply to: actually, ladies, it's III/VI - Anon

No, it is not - 3/6. I worked for a cardiologist, typed papers for articles in the leading cardiology journals - never saw any of them use Roman numerals.

Complete Discussion Below:

marks the location of current message within thread

Numbers question! VIP! Grade 3/VI systolic murmur. - MTEd
- grade versus stage - me
- Roman Numerals versus Numbers - ge
- numerals - dkm
- I'm old school, but still know its 3/6 - Never saw combination in anything
- numbers versus numerals - nss
- Numbers - mt
  - actually, ladies, it's III/VI - Anon
    - was roman numerals - ge
    - actually.... - desertflour
      - Roman Numerals - ge
    - Stedman's Cardio book says 1/6 - nss
      - Did you ever ask a cardiologist what he/she prefers? - Anon
        Book of Style - ge
    - The thing I am getting "heat" about is that I said you could not combine the 2 types of number - MTed
      - Do not combine - ge
      - absolutely correct - nss
        I agree - be consistent WHICHEVER way you use. No mixing. NM - Endiqua

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database