That should be "collect".

• Stressed out! - sh
  • THERE IS NO SUCH thing as TRUE IC - Me
    • About true ICs - L.B. Hartley
  • IRS clarification. - Wordy Gertie
  • re: Stressed out - anonymouse
    • IC but not medical - Lam
  • no matter if you are an IC... - atc
  • I emailed you - country MT
  • Dear Stressed: - Susie
  • IC - Charm
    • Congrats on sticking to your guns - Susie
      • BRAVO, BRAVO! - TRUE IC
    • Thank you for your reply. - sh
      • This is not the company's problem, it's yours. - sm
        • then you need to hire employees ... sm - sm
        • Yes the work needs to be done - but then you should do it.
          • Missing the point. - sm
            • I'm not missing the point. - You can't have your cake and eat it too!
              • Calm down. - sm
                • Happens all the time - Susie
                • Employer??? An employer - hires employees not ICs....
                  • You're right, employer was a bad choice of words. - sm
              • Let me clarify... SM - You can't have your cake and eat it too!
              • Plumber is IC. When you hire him, do you - expect him to fix the pipes? nm
                • Yes I expect him to fix the pipes. - SM
                  • Oh, do you really get the point? - sm
        • Excuse me - Susie
        • IC - Charm
  • Unfortunately, the situation you describe is TRUE IC status. - sm
    • That is not true. An IC has every right - to refuse work. SM
      • See post above. - sm
        • You are wrong. An IC can refuse - work and then the company can then find
          • I would not think many MTSOs would want to - use service of MT that just works whenever. nm
            • An IC needs to be reliable. - sm
              • Sounds like you need to check some - references before you contract with your IC.
                • You still have it all wrong. - sm
                  • You'll never keep an IC if you - treat them like they are an employee. NM
                    • You'll never keep a job with your kind of attitude either. - sm
                      • You sound so mature. - NOT - NM
                      • That should be "collect". - nm
                • Another clueless statement made. - sm
                  • But it is ultimately the company - who is responsible for the client.
                    • The point is... - sm
                • "Client would understand." That statement says - you have no idea what you are talking about.nm
                  • Not 1st time, wont be happy the 2nd time and - by 3rd time, they will be looking for new co. nm
                  • Your client will not run out overnight - and find a new company.
                    • Not at all. - sm
            • Well then EMPLOYEE it is.... - TRUE IC
              • No direct deposit, huh? - nm
      • And then company has right to not use services - of said IC. nm
        • Absolutely. If I need someone to transcribe 500 lines between the hours of - deb
          • Flipping that around - Susie
            • I totally agree. - TRUE IC
          • I do believe that would be employee not IC. - TRUE IC
            • ic versus employee - anon
            • Not true. sm - deb
            • Benefits - Charm
            • This person has no idea what they're saying. - sm

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu