Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Licensure would have to mean that only MTs in the US would be

Posted By: allowed to take the test, NOT (sm) on 2006-07-12
In Reply to: AAMT - MTMT

those offshore.  That would also mean that AAMT would have to agree to decertify those offshore MTs that took the CMT.  It was a HUGE mistake for AAMT to ever allow offshore individuals the ability to take the CMT. 


Kudos to  you for trying, but I suspect you probably won't be reupping your membership when it's time for renewal.  Best of luck.




Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

Thanks, that is exactly what I think about licensure.
It would probably be cheaper on the MTs out there as well. Recertification would be cheaper and so would the yearly dues. It would also mean that AAMT would have to follow state-regulated guidelines.
State Licensure for physicians
I use the State licensing agency for whatever state the physician is in.  I just Google State License or Health State licenses and it brings that particular website up and then I do a search.  Great Tool!