I never liked the 'ist' because it feminizes the
Posted By: sound of the job, which may have contributed -sm on 2008-06-26
In Reply to: have always considered myself transcriptionist 'ist' is a specialist. nm - oh well
to the job being considered on the very outer fringes of importance, and our pay going down, not up.
And reason #2 is more practical: I find it nearly impossible to fit the long word 'transcriptionist' into most spaces on forms, including tax forms, that ask for the type of work you do. So I use the shorter "transcriber".
And #3, I just never liked where the 'ist' word came from (AAMT), and that it came about at pretty much the same time as our wages, job satisfaction and respectability all took a nosedive.
Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old. To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
have always considered myself transcriptionist 'ist' is a specialist. nm
mm
|