? for QA

Posted By: sm on 2006-05-22
In Reply to: Question regarding QA - sm

Hey, good question! Also, we are very busy too trying to figure out what these ESL doctors are saying because some of us do not have as much experience as QA does. So, all in all, are we not the MTs who keep them in business? As far as I see it, it's not our fault nor QAs fault that they are busy, it's the company whose is at fault here. Once in a while I do send a thank you when I have to create a deficiency due to blanks from not understanding an ESL doctor or like you stated, noise in the background just to let them know I appreciate their input, especially when I trained on OP Reports.....I would type a note saying, "sorry for all the blanks". This is a dog-eat-dog business at times but we survive and we "all" give it our best.

Complete Discussion Below:

marks the location of current message within thread

Question regarding QA - sm
- I would! nm - annony
- Not all QA people are power-trip freaks (sm) - QA'er
  - Thank you for your input, as well - OP
- Thank you all for your input - OP
- Question for QA - ftmt
- Question for QA - sm
- ? for QA - sm
  - ? for QA - anonymous
    - No middleman here - loveQA
    - Anonymous - sm
      - Several accounts that I work on... - MT
        sm - Several Accts

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database