www.nocirc.org
Posted By: YES on 2009-02-09
In Reply to: ABSOLUTELY! They do it WITHOUT anesthetic sm - Mom of 2 uncircs
x
Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old. To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
www.nocirc.com
Yes, circumcision should be performed if there is a surgical indication for it, as you describe, but just having a foreskin is not a surgical indication.
If smegma/circumcision contributed to cancer, then we would see a lower incidence of it in the US, where there are far more circumcisions performed, than in Europe. But the incidence of penile cancer is lower in Europe.
Smegma serves the purpose of lubricating the foreskin so that it can glide over the glans. If there is a buildup, it's just a matter of cleanliness and education about cleanliness, not removing the offending part. Women have smegma as well. Thankfully we don't remove the labia in order to get rid of it.
The American Academy of Pediatrics no longer supports routine circumcision for infant males, saying the benefits do not outweigh the risks.
http://aappolicy.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/pediatrics%3b103/3/686
http://www.nocirc.org/articles/known.php
Okay, maybe a 3-inch pole.
www.nocirc.org
Yes, circumcision should be performed if there is a surgical indication for it, as you describe, but just having a foreskin is not a surgical indication.
If smegma/circumcision contributed to cancer, then we would see a lower incidence of it in the US, where there are far more circumcisions performed, than in Europe. But the incidence of penile cancer is lower in Europe.
Smegma serves the purpose of lubricating the foreskin so that it can glide over the glans. If there is a buildup, it's just a matter of cleanliness and education about cleanliness, not removing the offending part. Women have smegma as well. Thankfully we don't remove the labia in order to get rid of it.
The American Academy of Pediatrics no longer supports routine circumcision for infant males, saying the benefits do not outweigh the risks.
http://aappolicy.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/pediatrics%3b103/3/686
http://www.nocirc.org/articles/known.php
Okay, maybe a 3-inch pole.
|