Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

midwife

Posted By: ss on 2007-01-26
In Reply to: Midwife - Is this odd? - KC

First of all, I'd like to say how sad that with all the "views" nobody bothered to respond.  I guess if you are not complaining about an ESL or QA, it is not worthy of a response.


I have given birth 5 times, used an OB each time.  I have NO experience with midwives but from what you have written, it does not sound as though she is "fit" to be one. 


I'm glad to hear that she is being monitored right now and hopefully in good hands. Good luck to ALL of you!!!


 


 




Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

Midwife - Is this odd?

I will apologize ahead of time because I know this is going to be long!  My brother and sis in law are at the hospital right now, hopefully soon to be holding their new baby.  She was due on January 21st.  They chose to see a midwife and in the beginning they called and asked me for my advice about the midwife, to which I new nothing about.  I always have to remind my family members, I'm just an MT, not a doc!  I told them that if that was what they were comfortable with and it was a problem-free pregnancy, I thought that would be fine.  I know more and more women are using midwives. 


So, she went into labor at 35 weeks and the midwife kept her overnight at her office and apparently tried to start her labor, which I thought was strange.  I was always under the impression that most midwives are not supposed to deliver a pre-term baby.  However, I kept quiet.  I didn't want to interfere with their choice or make them feel that they were wrong.  She ended up going home because nothing happened, but she had a little bit of leakage.  Apparently the leak sealed and she did fine and had no more problems with pre-term labor. 


Yesterday, she went to see her midwife for her regular appointment and since the weather was really bad, the midwife told SIL to just stay and she would try to get her labor started.  I guess she had her bouncing on one of those big balls and jumping on the trampoline and I'm not sure if she used medication to induce the labor or not, but she did start to have labor pains.  Then, this morning, the midwife determined (by sound), since she prefers to nose use ultrasounds, that the cord was wrapped around the baby's neck and she wanted them to go to a hospital for delivery.  The nearest hospital is about 10 minutes away from her office.  However, she sent them to a hospital an hour away because she said the doctors at the nearest hospital might treat them badly because they have an access card.  She did not accompany them to the hospital, and she didn't call the hospital ahead of time.  When they got to the hospital, they were told that they closed their birthing unit 3 months ago, so they had to get back in the car and drive to another hospital. 


I personally find this all very odd and appalling.  Is it not customary that the midwife accompany the mother to the hospital in the event of an emergency? and shouldn't she have, at the very least, called the hospital ahead of time, maybe even had an ambulance transfer them?  Like I said, I really know nothing about midwives.  Maybe someone here does and can shed some light on this.  


Thankfully, the baby's heart beat is being monitored now.  I have had personal experience with the OBs in this hospital and I think they are in very good hands.   Right now I am just praying that everything goes well for them.


I had a midwife...

but I delivered my daughter at home.  However, a friend of mine used the same midwife and tried to deliver at home and could not.  She had to go to the hospital, and the midwife *did* accompany her and her husband to the hospital.


I don't understand why the midwife keeps trying to induce your SIL.  Why doesn't she just wait until she goes into labor naturally??


Sending prayers for the little one


Take iot from a midwife (posted lower under MWMT)
that the most painful stage of a delivery is the 2nd stage! Yes, I remember that and I agree!
change providers NOW; i am a midwife and for one, the no answering service sm
and no way to actually get a hold of someone who is at least on call for your OB, is not good practice. i always have a list of others my clients can call if for some reason they cannot get ahold of me in an emergency. top that with your uncomfortableness with the hospital and staff, change now or you will regret it later. most of the time when docs won't accept a late transfer of care is when there has been no prenatal care period. you have that and you could even get a copy of your own records and take to new OB to speed up that process. i can't see you having a good outcome giving how you are already feeling towards the hospital/nurses there.