Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Well, immunizations don't protect against...

Posted By: sm on 2007-02-03
In Reply to: No vaccinations for the kids and - Sylvia

the so-called "old and gone" diseases either. My husband had all his vaccinations and he had whooping cough as a child. Also, my daughter had the chicken pox vaccine and still had a case of the chicken pox, although somewhat milder than she may have had without it. So, who's to say that this vaccine will work any better than other vaccines??


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

How do we protect our
Children if we don't know what is going on?  What you did is no more than monitoring an online MySpace account, or other blogging.
My dad tried to protect me from a bioplar mom. yea my dad definitely!!
x
protect your kids
As a mom your first priority is to protect your kids, not protect your mother's feelings. If you feel your mother is crossing the line and won't stop after you talk to her, do what you need to to protect your kids.
Yes, but let's tell the truth and protect the embryos too. sm
Many geneticists have developed strong reservations about the relative value of ESC research versus ASC research. Obviously, every dollar that goes for ESC research does NOT go to ASC research. Both ESC and ASC research have been going on furiously around the world ever since stem cells were discovered, but it is the ASC research that has proven to be the most promising.

Yes, continue with ESC research, but not by de-funding ASC research, and not, by any means NOT, without protections for unborn human beings.

There really is no debate here.
It's a mother's duty to protect her children
if at all possible and until she knows more about this woman she has no obligation to let her speak to her children - you have obviously never been in this situation.  I understand what you are saying about way worse and horrible situations in the world but that is not this OP's problem - her problem here is the emotional wellbeing of her children and it is her call and IMO she made the correct one. 
So make it legal and tax and regulate it, to protect those sm
who are victims currently.