Tx so much for replying...

Posted By: PMS'er too on 2007-03-13
In Reply to: yes... - not alone here (sm)

I may just have to consider this procedure. My only thing was how long will it last? I do not plan to have any more children but am not on any type of birth control (rhythm method/condoms). I am 36. Thanks for replying and now I am feeling a bit better about possibly having the ablation. It is funny how we feel great and then all of a sudden when those heavy bleeds start it is like I'd rather just have a hysterectomy. But something tells me not to have a hysterectomy in that it may cause more problems. I also have fibroadenomas in the breasts, so... but I love my caffeine.... I don't know is the lesser of two evils. Thanks for shedding some light on the uterine ablation. I am going to see if this is an option for me.

Complete Discussion Below:

marks the location of current message within thread

does anyone have hormonal (pms) problems so bad that .... sm - luvmyboys
- I had PMS so bad I couldn't stand myself let alone anyone - M.A.
  - If you don't mind me asking, did you take the - PMS'er too
    - I usually started having symtoms about 7 days... - M.A.
      - My former OB/GYN was female sm - PMS'er too
- Same here! (sm) - CAMT
- you are SO... - not alone here (sm)
  - Had ablation 3 years ago, having hysterectomy - next week - sm
    - Awsome information! Tx for sharing... - PMS'er too
      - I would decline the IUD - that is the ablation's job - sm
  - You just answered a question I had. - Thank you
  - Uterine ablation. - PMS'er too
    - yes... - not alone here (sm)
      - Tx so much for replying... - PMS'er too
        well... - not alone here (sm)
        I'm definitely going to ask about it, but sm - PMS'er too
- My hormones rule my personality - sm
  - thanks for the link, i'm going to check it out sm - luvmyboys
- It's bad for me too. I'm 31. - sm
- tried hormonal creams? - sm
- You are not alone. - PMS'er here too.
  - thanks PMSer too. sm - luvmyboys

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database

Thank you for replying...
Think this is the way to go for my dad.

If you're replying to me...sm
...no, I'm saying exactly the opposite. I'm saying that we DO hold rapists responsible but we could not reasonably do so if it were true that they were simply driven by their hormones. If so, they would not be responsible for their actions.

We do hold rapists responsible for their acts because we recognize that behavior is not simply "hormonal". Testosterone does not explain rape or any other acts of violence, and therefore does not excuse them. Behavior that we consider legally culpable must be volitional and not merely biological.

My post objected to the simplistic explanation of bad behavior in terms of "testosterone" (just as I would have objected to an explanation based on "estrogen"). Hormones influence, but hardly explain, human behaviors.

If you don't have a suggestion, don't bother replying.

As parents, we all have rights to name our child whatever we like. If we want to name them all starting with the same letter, that is their prerogative. When someone asks for something in particular, if you don't have any suggestions, don't respond at all. Why does there have to be someone like this for almost every post?

Sorry again - I just realized you were replying to a message from me, not "me"
Boy, this can get confusing. I thought you were replying to my message. Sorry for the confusion.