If you insult someone of course they are gonig to react defensively (sm)

• She is pregnant again. - Getarzanne
  • People can get pregnant on an IUD. I have two relatives who did. - stranger things have happened
  • If she has 10y. IUD, how did he get 2 kids with her? - nm
  • maybe she collects welfare and does not tell you. - start checking - N/M
  • I have a friend who called me to say her 34 year old son dying - In your shoes
    • This is truly sickening. I had an uncle who lived with his mother sm - I know what you mean
  • You lost him years ago - help where you can when you wish - sm
  • You, my dear, are the reason they are able to not work and - Would not fuss
    • I am not your dear. - OP
      • You are an enabler - mt65sha
        • OP should get custody of kids if things so bad. - Unless she just wants to gripe but not really help
      • hungry - marilyn
        • That's right!! When children are hungry (sm) - Lisa
          • So you just continue to give money to grown folks - Hungry folks
        • Marilyn...you are a big-hearted - tinkerbell
      • You are talking about grown-a.. folks - Would not fuss
  • Why doesn't your son work? (sm) - NC-MT
  • Why aren't they working? - sm
  • oh my... - tinkerbell
    • Sounds like a real sucker to me - Reallly?
      • I may be looney, but IMO - tinkerbell
        • Good mother and enabler do not belong in same - sentence. nm
          • Everyone has a right to voice their opinion - (sm) - NC-MT
            • I DID state my opinion. Where do you see a - debate? Above "good mother" poster.
              • You can state yours w/o criticizing someone else's though (nm) - NC-MT
                • I did not raise a debate, criticize the OP, or anything - else, I stated my opinion. Period. nm "Good Mom
          • Thanks for clearing that up for me. - tinkerbell
            • Such a juevenile post. - nm
              • If you insult someone of course they are gonig to react defensively (sm) - NC-MT
                • Dont know who you are referring to, but I never - insulted OP. Are you OP? nm
                  • I am the other poster who you insulted - tinkerbell
                    • I am "juvenile post" poster. "Looney" poster is some - one different. You cant always tell who is who. n
                      • So I will apologize to both posters - tinkerbell
                        • You don't owe them an apology (sm) - Bored MT
                          • Thank you bored MT..... - tinkerbell
                          • Yes, I think she needs to apologize - Trying to help

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

It is my understanding there is a Vatican I and a Vatican II and that one is ultra-conservative and traditional and the other has sort of a more liberal (for lack of a better word) approach.  So I am sure that not all Catholic churches and all priests are like this one priest.

Also I apologize for the homosexual/molestation remarks I made in my original post.  That was uncalled for and was a terrible thing to say.  Not all priests should be categorized that way.  I was angry with this one priest and obviously didn't have a stronghold on my anger when I first posted.

Thanks for your responses and for not being offended.  It would have been very easy to tear into me for my generalizations.

I have one more question.  My son-in-law to be said something about if he and my daughter were to be married by a justice of the peace, they could still get married in the Catholic in the future should my daughter convert, but if they were to marry in any other church by any other man of God, there marriage would never be recognized in the Catholic church nor could they ever get married (again to each other) in the Catholic church.  Is this true?

This is all just too legalistic for me.