we have this clarified now, now we have to convince
Posted By: () on 2009-06-10
In Reply to: The knowledge thing is right on the money - Hooray for VR
clients and MTSOs to pay the same for VR and straight MTing.
The thing is that the VR software salesmen who sell the VR software, which is very expensive, have to give their prospective buyers an incentive so that they buy this expensive stuff: Their catch is the promise that MTs can do twice, even thrice in the same time and are going to be paid half, as they assumed it will beso easy to do.
This was all a misspeculation, it is as hard as straight MTing and takes almost the same time.
Solution: Pay for VR the same as for straight MTing.
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
No one will ever convince me
the MTSO only gets half of the usual cpl for VR than they did for text. If there is a profit in it, they simply do not care and certainly they ain't gonna share that profit with the MTs.
are you trying to convince me or sm
yourself? I have lived in four different states and kept my job with MQ. My BP is fine and I am not a hot head. I AM SICK AND TIRED of MTs accepting this IC status crap when it is not IC status. This is one of the things that has brought this profession down. They hire you IC and then tell you what to do and when to do it. If these MTSOs want to do that they they should pay our taxes at least. Some folks (like myself) prefer IC status, but obviously not because of the taxes but because of the flexibility. If it makes you happy to work that way then so be it. But my opinion of MDI is based on MY experience. I am not telling you that your experience is not what you say it is, but you are telling me that I am lying.
When it comes to in this together that only goes until these MTSOs break the law and then I WILL standup for what I believe is right and at that point I AM NOT in this with you if you condone this IC status baloney and what these companies are doing. You need to open your eyes.
Well guys, you convince me --
from now on I'm going to demand that I have work. I don't care if it takes it from someone else. That's too bad for them. I'm just going to worry about me and my pocketbook. The rest of you don't matter. Thanks for the push!
MTSO will try to convince you YOU are the only 1
MTSO will try to convince you, you are the only one with problem when they will actually have +++ complaining. I think this is one reason MTs are discouraged from talking to each other. You would think MTSO secrets were more important/to be guarded than national security.
Nice try Beth! Who are you trying to convince?
nm
That is why I clarified that it has bee
a few years since I worked for them.
Thank you, but I had already clarified it.
Please see message in which I clarified what I was looking for..
Decent to me is less than $500 a month for family coverage and preferably with a copay that is reasonable and deductible between $500-$1000. I know of some companies that are charging families $1100-$1300 a month.. What's the point when you just work for insurance only. As far as PTO, I really do not care if it is anything spectacular.. maybe 10 days a year.. Hopefully that helps get me some good suggestions. Thanks again Busy MT
Glad you clarified that because - sm
I was going to say that if you produce around 2K lines a day on VR and if you make 3 cpl, then you are making a whopping 60 bucks! 7-11 pays better than that. So you must make more than that. Let's say 5 cpl. That would 100 bucks a day. So if you work 40 hours, you are making 2K a month. Perhaps you can live on that but I can't.
I didn't say that it was. I specifically clarified that in parentheses. nm
x
Oops!!! B-wear??? what does that mean. I read some posts but I could not see that anyone clarified
what the benefits were changing to...Anyone??
No we won't. I said slow, meaning slower than usual, should have clarified.
.
|
