she is right, she is not suppose to cut sm

• No payment from MTSO - Whyme?
  • Maybe she is asking now so she can pay you - sm -
  • you could be right or you could be - WhiningFlashBacks
  • Your post is really silly...sm - nn
  • she is right, she is not suppose to cut sm - KSMT
    • What do you mean - if you make less than $600 you don't have to report it ??? - MTIAM
      • No, it's not bad or inaccurate advice - it's true. - Anon
  • More than $600? - mtme
    • If the MTSO owner wants to report it on - JT
  • You're using her computer? Doesn't sound - like an IC arrangement at all.
  • For tax purposes, she has to have your - TN

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

they would have told me by now if they were unhappy with my production or my hours.

I feel like I have sung this song before.

I like both platforms.  Bayscribe is easy to use, and the Expander emulates PRD+, which I was used to.  The spellchecker is kind of clumsy -- that could definitely use some tweaking.  The thing I liked the most about Bayscribe was at the end of each report, you saw the line count for that report and how much you made, plus a total of lines for all reports and the total number of lines you had made for the day.

I am currently using ExText, and it is also easy to use.  I have to go to ichart to view my line count, though, and you cannot get it on a report-to-report basis.   The CTRL+I feature is useless to me since my employer does not count headers or footers.  I quit using it because I hated to see what a big difference there was at the end of the day.  I could do 300 lines per hour on Bayscribe.  With the current setup, maybe 250.  I can do 300 if I just sit and type as fast as I can with no breaks, but that cannot last for 8 hours solid.

Either platform is okay.  I still kinda miss WP51 -- think DOS-based programs were faster -- but you can't hold on to a dinosaur.  And, obviously that is just my opinion.  Hope it helps. 

preference.  When I started transcribing 35 years ago or so, I had never heard of AAMT or anything like it, but the people in the Medical Records Department (which of course his now referred to as HIM -- why keep things the same if you can change them constantly for no rason) who transcribed the reports were called transcriptionists.  The machine I used to access the dictation was called a transcriber. 

Of course, it is no big deal and I shouldn't get so hung up with labels.  I worked briefly for an Indian company (felt like I was sleeping with the enemy but that's another story), and they called us transcribers … ugh.

since the holiday, but I am able to get my lines.  I'm hoping it picks up soon.

Hope this helps.