not sure about "good" but sm
Posted By: CAMT on 2006-04-05
In Reply to: Know of any good companies hiring PT Radiology? (nm) - Radiology anyone?
there have been a lot of rad positions on MTdaily.com The MTjobs.com if free entry. Look there might find something good. They seem to be paying higher than MTing. One about a month ago ws 14 a line.
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
This "good" pay is only for ICs
.
Which branch of MD-IT is the "good one"
but want to apply to the right branch. Thanks in advance.
Oh, yeah. Because you are so "good."
t
Why did you leave that "good company" TT
Which company did you find better than TT?
AAMT did not change "good English" and terminology, sm
The changes originated with the American Medical Association, the Chicago Manual of Style, as well as other references from which the AAMT BOS is compiled.
I wasn't trying to be a smart-aleck about the "good luck" sm
part - I truly wish everyone could get what they need at what is a fundamentally good company (in my opinion). I'm sorry your STM isn't helping. Can you try again with someone else in the company?
(PS - I saw her today at the reception, glass of wine in her hand. haha)
They said we'd have a choice BUT you'd have to have a "good reason" to stay an IC/stat.
nt
It's "well." You're paid "well," not "good."
You get "good pay," and you're "paid well."
And the use of an apostrophe is required in ALL "n't" words. Not even going to try to tackle the balance of the punctuation.
Transcend obviously prefers quantity over quality these days.
|
