but by not mentioning the name

Posted By: diddles on 2006-02-04
In Reply to: most companies have that first part in their - company confidentiality policies anyway

I would find that suspect. If I were looking at an employer based on an ad on this site, searched the site and the name doesn't even pop up anywhere for (say, for the sake of discussion) 2 years, then I would wonder why. It means that not only are disgruntled employees not talking, but satisfied employees aren't either. So then I would wonder why. That to me is a red flag. I think that essence of control borders on paranoia. Why can't the employees who are happy say so and their reasons why?

The second part makes me wonder about how the company feels about AAMT. I could see a union in the future for MTs based on nothing other the domino effect of AAMT's apprenticeship program (plumbers, electricians, welders, etc., all have apprenticeship programs and sprouted unions). SOO, does that mean the company might be less likely to consider me for employment if I earn a CMT?

Complete Discussion Below:

marks the location of current message within thread

Would you work for a company - diddles
- Yes, I would if the pay is right and the offer was out of sight! nm - mt24
- Absulutely not, but keep in mind... - sm
  - There is always that "secret network" - diddles
    - I wouldn't do it - NB
  - Very interesting. I am going to copy this and save it. nm - Thanks for the info
- i wouldn't sign it, but cross that out and sign - yoga
- most companies have that first part in their - company confidentiality policies anyway
  - but by not mentioning the name - diddles
    - i am one and have stated my reasons why - and was viciously attacked
      - That is why - sm
        that is also a reason I might not apply to one - if there is nothing at all
    - Is it possible their MTs are too busy working why they - do not post?
      - no those employees are all over here - diddles
        posts - curious
        Nothing wrong with that but many recommend to their employer - see inside
        one raw deal i see here is this - oh, forgot to add
        I thought the purpose of this site was - diddles
        well, that would be nice and fair IF we had - to log in but we don't
- No (sm) - fuzz5

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database

Wait...let me guess. Shapin right? Can go for long without mentioning them!
If they are making the $ it is either because of working round the clock or whizzing through with poor quality. I am thinking whizzing through because in past postings they are very busy with posting negative things here. I make 4 cpl and listen to everything as required. I do well, but to do it right and be thorough you would not make big $ at 1.5.

Gees just mentioning arguring started an argument
Just not worth it. It's all about respect....and maturity.