and it is stupid

• To Recruiter below - mt47mtmm
  • recruiter comments on schedule - clsk
  • Get this deal......sm - Disgusted!!
    • see inside for a couple of links - desperado
      • link again for MSN Money credit check - desperado
    • The legally cannot do that without your authorization - ERMT
    • Credit check - anon
      • Are you a California resident? - catsxoxo
        • Oops, meant to post under credit check - catsxoxo
      • A company feels like if you keep your credit in good standing, then - Agree with checking
        • I was part of the Hurricane Katrina disaster and am doing the best I can to rebuild...sm - Disgusted!!
          • You dont remember okay credit check but you - could have. Denying check probably red flag to co.
        • There are lots of things a company can tell from - Your credit...sm
          • I moved MANY times, but it was because I was single and on a budget, not because I was irresponsible - R
          • I agree with all of your post except the last line! - I would not hire someone with poor credit. sm
            • not true at all - no name
              • You are totally right! - This is all so wrong
        • When I am renting, I am PAYING; when I'm working, THEY are paying ME. sm - diff
        • Come down off our high horse - MTMTMT
          • Very well said! - MEMT
        • I still don't get it...sm - aa
          • agree. you could also fill that cup the other way - anon
          • This is not just about MTSO checking credit. It is - legal for ANY prospective employer to check. nm
            • please tell us WHY.. - going around in circles
              • Can only think of one valid reason - that actually would affect THIS job
                • k now that makes sense, but..man - aa
              • Because they CAN. It is legal. They want to see - how responsible you are. nm
                • you just basically gave the same answer .sm - hmm
                • Without your permission it is not legal. - Casey
                  • In all paperwork sent before hire, probably are - okaying check, just dont realize it. nm
            • and it is stupid - nm
        • Bull. - MslaMT
          • I totally agree also. - ICMT
          • totally agree - anon
        • credit check - anon
          • LOL. That was funny. I like that petty cash thing :) - aa
        • Someones credit has absolutely nothing to do with how good a worker they are. - SM
          • It should not be the only thing to consider but - I think credit checks do have merit for job apps.
          • My son has a horrible credit report and - Have good example
    • It should be none of their business - what anyone's finances are like
      • Exactly! - Casey
      • Exactly what I was thinking....sm - Disgusted!!
        • They contacted you first and then did this? - that's just an evil head game
        • Credit check IS the norm. Employers want to how - responsible you are with $ as that might reflect
          • Well if this is becoming the NORM there's a problem s/m - whorn
          • BUT... - Ayn
          • reflect how responsible you are in other things. - nm
            • Problem with your statement is - mt47mtmm
              • This is not a problem with "my statement." It is how - things are done, legally. nm
                • See inside - mt47mtmm
                  • AMEN!!!! - JJ
              • I cannot believe this - anon101
                • What makes anyone think only MTs are having this done?? - Agree with checking
  • mine called during a time I had NOT given; then emailed with No Answer, So Go On-Line And Test; - I said I'm no longer interested. n/m
  • I totally agree with you. - KC
    • No return call from recruiter - momMT.45
    • The MW recruiters seem to all take the job to get free trips to trade shows and nothing else. nm - sad but true
      • IMO, trip to trade show sure not worth having to - deal with MTs, facilities, higher management,etc.n
        • But they go to SO many shows, they're never in the office dealing with any of that! LOL nm - sad but true

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

What does "gross line" in terms of pay mean? Thank you.

It was really strange...the test was multiple choice, however, they not only asked questions relating to terminology, meanings, what type of test would you use...., abbreviations and so on but they also asked questions pertaining to windows operations. 

I felt very, very confident after finishing the test - for Radiologoy you have to make a 90 or better.  I have been doing medical transcription for 10 years covering nearly every category including the Big 4.  I know Radiology - it's what I love to type.  Anyway, I just checked my email and they sent me an email saying that I only made an 88 on the test, not meeting their standards and could not be considered for employment.  I could take the test again in six months. 

I graduated from MT School with a 4.0 GPA (I didn't fail ANY tests, etc.).  I had to take every test imaginable in order to prove myself to my first employer in order to get my foot in the door and I've never had a QA score below 98%.  So, for them to tell me I only made an 88 is totally and completely blowing my mind.  I don't whether I'm mad at the company, very upset with myself or both right now, but I can say my brain is doing flip flops in my head trying to figure out what went wrong.

Okay, I'm done crying now. 

When a company downloads their software into your own PC, if you quit, does the company remove the software or do you remove the software?  Some of these programs are so vast, they would take up tons of memory.  How easy would it be to get rid of it on your own?

Oh boy, I said it was stupid question. 

What are 1st, 2nd, 3rd shifts?  I mean, what hours do they generally consist of?  I've always worked on a 24-hour TAT basis or now even as an employee, my shift is between the hours of XX and XX, so have never worked on the basis of a certain set *shift*. 

Sorry for the dumb question, but when I see ads that say openings for 1st or 2nd or 3rd shift, I don't know what hours they mean.  Thanks for any answers!

The IRS has EVERYTHING to do with this.  IRS defines criteria for employee vs IC status, MTSOs laugh all the way to the bank at IRS and MT ICs because MTSOs have been on the non-legal side, pushing the limits, with little to no work force resistance.  Factor in the lack of employee benefits and although ICs may work as hard and put in as much hours as employees, ICs  make significantly less per unit than MT employeese.  Company owners have taken the risk that we are all just so grateful to have any income, that we won't fight IC vs employee status.  In fact, these company owners make millions of dollars annually filling employee jobs with IC employees without benefits, confident that no one will blow the whistle.

IRS laws clearly distinguish between independent contractor and employee status:
 
ICs:  Enter into a signed contractual agreement with Contracting Party, providing service of completing projects (work). 

-  Contracting Party CAN define begin/end deadlines, length of time IC service is required, basic guidelines, definitions of project and expected outcome.
-  If Contracting Party demands IC adhere to step-by-step instructions, supplies training, or insists IC work during specific hours of the day, specific days of the week, 30 or more hours per week, IC is an EMPLOYEE, entitled to all benefits afforded by definition, INCLUDING UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION.

ICs: ICs purchase, procure and use their own tools, equipment, software, lbooks and other learning materials and training programs to carry out contracted project. 

- If Contracting Party loans, sells, leases, provides or pays for arrangements for loan, sale, or lease of tools, equipment, software, reference materials or books necessary to the project IC is an EMPLOYEE entitled to all benefits afforded by definition, INCLUDING UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION.

ICs invoices Contracting Party for payment of services, arranging for CP financing, up front partial payment with final payment at completion of project, or payment submitted @10, @30, @60, day terms. 

- If a Contracting Party pays ICs on a regular biweekly or bimonthly  basis, through scheduled direct deposits, ICs most probably are employees robbed of the benefit of matching employer funds contributed their Social Security funds, as the law provides for Employees.  ICs (business owners and other self-employed) are solely responsible for payment of their individual quarterly state and fed tax installments, their own Social Security with no SS contribution by employer.

The IRS has EVERYTHING to do with this and by collective silence, MTs continue to allow MTSO's continue rob them.  After the lack of appreciation MTs have suffered, loss of jobs to VR, overseas, I think it's time to stand up and demand what is rightfully ours. As they've already dropped our wages to 0.06 - 0.08 cpl, and turned us against each other as we have to fight for our share of the work, we can only benefit from saying, Enough is enough.

(To poster:  You've been ill-advised.)

You shouldn't feel stupid for being part of this industry, you should feel stupid for writing that post.