YOU are not making them look dumb! They do that to themselves! nm

f

• Verbatim nonsense! - Lee
  • I've always thought verbatim is not only an insult to the doctor, but also to our profession. sm - IMO
    • Years ago I had this one physician who - Lacy
    • Medical language specialist is a title made up by MTs. The truth is...sm - vb89
      • Excellent post. Agree wholeheartedly. sm - fn
      • I disagree, as well..sm - nn
      • I disagree, but I'm not the argumentative type..we are entitled to our own opinions though. sm - IMHO
        • I, too, disagree. - anon
          • YOU are not making them look dumb! They do that to themselves! nm - vb89
            • Absolutely! We're no longer being paid enough sm - fn
          • I just recently started a verbatim account... - Hayseed
            • Hayseed, it won't be long until you feel sm - fn
  • I HATE verbatim accounts - sm
    • QA dinging - Lee

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

explain to me how you add things to shorthand, when I open it, there are already some things there, but how do add something like sob for shortness of breath and have it save so you can use it??

');>

to work there....all QA came from India, the most ridiculous QA I had EVER experienced.  It got to a point where I would NOT even pay any attention to QA that was sent to me. 

Editing can be the best and the worst job you will ever have.  I derived so much satisfaction from teaching and mentoring the transcriptionists.  I provided excellent feedback and did my best to help them become better MTs.  On the other hand, it can be aggravating to the core.  Some MTs appreciate the input, thank you for it, and put it into immediate practice.  Others, however, are the abusers of the system and don't care about the quality of their work and send through the same crap over and over again, knowing that the Editor will have to correct it or risk a negative QA review him/herself.  There were times I felt as though it would have been easier to delete the whole report and type it from scratch rather than go line by line, correcting multiple errors in every sentence.  Editing became a bad deal when the MTSOs figured out how much money they would save by paying the editors per line rather than per hour or salary.  The editor was expected to perform all the same duties, often including reformatting or retyping the entire report and correcting all the repeat account specific errors, WHICH, by the way, have been explained to the same offenders over and over again.  The editor earns a fraction of what the original MT does for the same report but often invests just as much time in the report.  Also there is no compensation for feedback sent in e-mails.  Like I said, there are days you will love it, but there are days, also, where you will sit in your chair, steaming and enraged at how you are being taken advantage of by your company and the MTs who abuse your knowledge and time.