Researching...

• Companies offshoring to India - AmericanMT
  • You are so deluded it's pathetic, - No stupidity please.
  • What has sending work to India done? - The other side of life
  • Here isa website to help - DEA
  • No, it isn't wrong for others to help those in need - Jessie
  • 20 years then outsourced - mom2huskies
    • The woman who outsourced us is benefitting, I am sure. She got a promotion and no doubt a raise. - MSMT
  • human beings - digusted and ashamed
  • Do you work for Spheris? - sounds like their philosophy
  • Offshoring to India may not be affecting you now... - Anon
    • It's not just our industry that's affected...sm - Southern belle
    • Outsourcing - Sherry Lee
    • Your post is spot on. I agree with everything you say. - MT and worn out
    • Every word of your eloquent post should be published - in every newspaper in America. - sm
    • Where's the union? - JustMe
      • I don't think many would know how to go about forming a union. SM - MeToo
        • Researching... - JustMe
          • let us know what you find because - medtran26
    • Very well put - Charity begins at home
    • offshoring - anon
  • you are very naive (but in a nice way) - mtgrrl
    • hmmmm - TW
    • Want to clarify one thing - mtgrrl
  • it's more than just transcription jobs - small message
  • Not my responsibility to develop their country - Charity begins at home
    • Great post! (SM) - Marmann
      • Very good post - Charity begins at home
    • Great points! - mic
    • Those in need do not benefit from outsourcing - mtgrrl
    • Not only that, but those of us working currently are the ones - sm - LowlyMT
    • Why are you making Indians scapegoats SM - CK
      • It's about Nat'l Security, not bashing India - Digusted & Ashamed
      • Here's a thought.......... - sm
      • I'm more bothered by any poster who defends - Indian workers.......nm
      • scapegoats - doe
        • Right on! Agree 100%! - nm
      • scapegoats - US MT
        • The first statement is true. I obviously SM - CK
  • companies offshoring to India - US MT
    • I totally agree with you on this... - dsger
  • You must be one of very few MTs who has not...lm - Good for you, but....
    • So totally agree - mom2huskies
    • An excellent post and ditto, right there with you. nm - Writing on the wall
      • Thanks, and as a post script, I must say I'm SICK of being...sm - Good for you, but.....
        • And I would suggest we begin by having a SM - CK
        • Totally agree. You hit the nail on the head. nm - MTfor2long

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

We went from a wonderful productive program to one that is more likely to not be working on any given days.  Isn't it up to the company to provide us with adequate tools to do our jobs?  They are prohibiting me from earning the income I earned when I first began with them, losing at LEAST $1,000 a month. I've documented as many complaints as I can just in case I need them for evidence in the future.  The way I interpret the law in my state (which I posted below), I think it's worth a try while I'm looking for another job.

More importantly, if this company discovers that their transcriptionists can collect unemployment because of the terrible working conditions they've created, it might light a fire under their butts to fix the program, and maybe not so many will be forced to quit due to such terrible working conditions.

Old posts were negative, newer ones are positive.  Wondered about insurance cost, flexibility of schedule, etc.  TIA.